In my view the evaluation of my hypotheses should be according to where
they stand on this continuum.
As with any kind of change, knowing where
we stand on the continuum of traits is the first step.
Not exact matches
I've found that moms are
on a
continuum when it comes to leaving their kids with someone else, with some moms scooting happily out the door with a kiss and a wave, while others leave with much hesitation and
stand hidden outside the door for a few minutes to make absolutely sure that everyone stops crying (I might possibly be speaking from personal experience
on that).
The late Mary Kroeger, BSN, CNM, MPH, past chair of WABA's Health Care Practices Task Force quotes in her book Impact of Birthing Practices
on Breastfeeding: «Advocate for the mother - baby
continuum by taking the
stand that breastfeeding can not be the «physiologic norm» without including «physiologic childbirth» and immediate and uninterrupted mother - baby contact.»
So where do you
stand on the tenacity
continuum?
Stability therefore exists
on a
continuum from very stable (e.g. leg press machine), to neutrally stable (e.g. barbell back squat), to very unstable (e.g. dumbbell squat
standing on a Bosu stability ball).
Suggestions: students can jot down their thoughts first and then use the «
stand on a line» or «opinion
continuum» activity to indicate where they fall
on the just / unjust spectrum with each of these scenarios: