Sentences with phrase «standard essential patents in»

Acting for Koninklijke Philips N.V. in action for infringement of standard essential patents in the mobile telecommunications industry (with Meredith Pickford QC)(2016 — ongoing)

Not exact matches

Before a patented technology is included in an essential standard, the owner must agree to license it on «fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory» terms.
Nokia said it signed a cross-license agreement with RIM covering standards - essential cellular patents in 2003, a deal that was amended in 2008.
On Friday, Apple filed a lawsuit in a San Diego federal court alleging that Qualcomm is charging too much for «standard essential» patents and is withholding nearly $ 1 billion in royalty cap «rebates» in retaliation for Apple's cooperation with anti-trust investigators in the U.S., South Korea and elsewhere.
The company later filed two lawsuits against Qualcomm in China, alleging its supplier abused its market position and failed to license standard essential patents on fair terms.
Last week the Patents Court, a division of the English High Court, handed down another important decision in the continuing development of the law relating to Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) and FRAND.
TCL v. Ericsson: Representing TCL in a breach of contract action based on FRAND obligations relating to Ericsson's standard essential patents.
Advising a number of major manufacturers in the telecoms industry (eg Ericsson, Lenovo, Sony Mobile or NTT Docomo) on patent litigation, in particular relating to standard - essential patents.
Formally, only the iPhone 4 and iPad 2 are affected, but in practical terms, Apple now knows that (unless the appeals court reverses this ruling) Samsung may be able to quickly seek injunctions against newer Apple products over standard - essential patents.
In a subsequent post (probably the very next one) I'll also report on the standard - essential patent case that was discussed, for a second time, on Friday.
In high technology, standards - essential patents are key for companies looking to generate revenue by licensing out IP.
So, for instance, the slide and unlock mechanism in a smartphone is patented but is not essential for the operation of a smartphone standard as other mechanisms for unlocking the phone can and have been devised.
The article focuses on the recent development of connected technologies in the automotive industry, such as cellular, WiFi, and the tens of thousands of purportedly «standard essential» patents that allegedly cover them.
The article focuses on the recent development of connected technologies in the automotive industry, such as cellular, WiFi, and the tens of thousands of purportedly «standard essential» patents...
The United States International Trade Commission just gave notice that it will review in part — actually, in many parts — a preliminary ruling that held Apple to infringe a wireless standard - essential patent (SEP) held by Google subsidiary Motorola Mobility.
The BSA and the four professors argue that Judge Posner's ruling is perfectly consistent with eBay and explain why injunctions over FRAND - pledged standard - essential patents (SEPs) in most cases must be denied as such requests fail to satisfy the eBay criteria.
In Case C - 170 / 13 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v ZTE Corp & ZTE Deutschland GmbH, (Judgment of the 5th Chamber, CJEU, 16 July 2015) the CJEU was asked to rule for the first time on whether seeking an injunction and other associated remedies by the owner of a Standard Essential Patent (SEP) against a company in breach of the patent (but one willing to become a licensee) can amount to an abuse of a dominant position in breach of EU competition law (Article 102 TFEUIn Case C - 170 / 13 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v ZTE Corp & ZTE Deutschland GmbH, (Judgment of the 5th Chamber, CJEU, 16 July 2015) the CJEU was asked to rule for the first time on whether seeking an injunction and other associated remedies by the owner of a Standard Essential Patent (SEP) against a company in breach of the patent (but one willing to become a licensee) can amount to an abuse of a dominant position in breach of EU competition law (Article 102 Patent (SEP) against a company in breach of the patent (but one willing to become a licensee) can amount to an abuse of a dominant position in breach of EU competition law (Article 102 TFEUin breach of the patent (but one willing to become a licensee) can amount to an abuse of a dominant position in breach of EU competition law (Article 102 patent (but one willing to become a licensee) can amount to an abuse of a dominant position in breach of EU competition law (Article 102 TFEUin breach of EU competition law (Article 102 TFEU).
In the case before Judge Posner, Motorola was seeking hundreds of millions of dollars for a single cellular standard - essential patent; the initial royalty demand that gave rise to Judge Robart's case amounted to $ 4 billion annually and was later reduced to hundreds of millions.
On the one hand, Standard Setting Organizations (SSOs) have been exploring changes to their licensing policies, in particular in relation to the commercial implications of FRAND pledges given by holder of Standard Essential Patents («SEPs»).
Our win against LG included the first award of damages for willfulness in a standard - essential patent case, which also included a sua sponte enhancement by the Court.
In this space the patents are not standard essential — the owner has no obligation to license them and can pursue injunctions against any rival that it suspects of infringement without any restrictions.
Design patent remedies, injunctive relief, partial summary judgment over invalidated patents, the royalty base (a context in which I hope Apple will defeat Ericsson because it will discourage outsized royalty claims over standard - essential patents), and possibly some procedural issues concerning the interplay of infringement cases and FRAND contract cases in different venues.
The lawyers in Baker Botts» Antitrust Practice have substantial experience in representing clients in investigations and litigation related to the intersection between intellectual property and antitrust laws, including Standard Essential Patents.
Advising and representing a global technology company in a number of patent litigations, including defending it against standard - essential patent assertions and against the largest ever damages claim brought in patent infringement proceedings in Germany.
Over the past 30 years, he has handled over 175 patent and other IP lawsuits including suits relating to standard essential patents (SEPs) and worldwide FRAND license obligations in district courts throughout the US, before the International Trade Commission and on appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
He regularly advises on multijurisdictional litigation strategies, particularly in relation to the assertion of standard - essential patents.
A significant portion of his practice relates to complex cases that involve the interface of intellectual property and antitrust, especially in relation to standard essential patents and he has been involved in a significant number of the leading cases in that area.
In Europe, our lawyers have been instrumental in encouraging the European Commission's Directorate General for Competition to initiate several high - profile investigations relating to alleged abuse of standard - essential patentIn Europe, our lawyers have been instrumental in encouraging the European Commission's Directorate General for Competition to initiate several high - profile investigations relating to alleged abuse of standard - essential patentin encouraging the European Commission's Directorate General for Competition to initiate several high - profile investigations relating to alleged abuse of standard - essential patents.
In the standard - essential patents context, Apple consistently advocates the «smallest saleable unit» approach.
Standard essential patents are patents that are typically identified by participants in an organization developing a new technical sStandard essential patents are patents that are typically identified by participants in an organization developing a new technical standardstandard.
For example, in 2013, the United States Trade Representative vetoed an International Trade Commission (ITC) decision blocking importation of certain iPhones based on a standard essential patent.
The exercise of intellectual property exclusionary rights in connection with a standard essential patent has been more fully debated in the United States.
Some interesting scenarios discussed in the Guidelines include standard essential patents, patent pooling and patent assertion entities.
Ben Ni of King & Wood Mallesons gives an overview of the guideline for trial of standard essential patent dispute cases, which incorporates rules established in cases worldwide
The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California today, argues that Qualcomm used standards - essential patents it holds to demand elevated royalties and other license payments from phone manufacturers.
Apple alleged in its lawsuits that Qualcomm has been abusing it position in the chip industry to charge higher royalties on standard - essential patents and force Apple into exclusive deals.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z