Not exact matches
It was inevitable, perhaps, that the «culture wars» — the
debate that continues to rage over the impact of
political correctness, multiculturalism, and their allied ideologies — would spawn a genre of liberal apologetics designed to exonerate liberalism itself from its role in abetting the establishment of radical doctrine as a mandatory
standard of judgment in mainstream cultural life.
Following months of lively
debate among education, civic, and
political leaders, the Massachusetts board of education approved plans Tuesday to replace the state's own English / language arts and mathematics
standards with a common set of teaching guidelines now being approved in states across the nation.
Furthermore, in accepting public funds, religious schools run the risk of being mired in
political debates, battles over regulation and accountability, and disruptive inquiries into their school
standards in admission, curriculum, and hiring practices.
Thus, in accepting government funds, they run the risk of being mired in
political debates, battles over regulation and accountability, and disruptive inquiries into their school
standards and curricula.
Supporters rushed the
standards» adoption, used whatever
political channels were most convenient, eschewed public
debate and discussion, and in doing so triggered a massive backlash that either caused states to reject the
standards outright or led them to water down the initiative to such an extent that there's little left of the original vision, which called for the careful alignment of
standards, tests, curricular resources, and teaching strategies, all to be shared across state borders.
Given the
political climate and opportunities for change — the availability of stimulus funds (including Secretary of Education Arne Duncan's commitment of $ 350 million in stimulus funding to support assessment work), the movement toward common
standards, and the upcoming reauthorization of No Child Left Behind — we can bypass the
debate between the two flawed options of either maintaining the status quo or returning to performance - based assessment systems of the 1990s.
As per an article in The Tennessean: «Huffman — a former Teach For America executive and ex-husband of controversial former Washington, D.C., Chancellor Michelle Rhee — made Tennessee a flashpoint nationally for
debates over teacher evaluations, teacher licensing, Common Core
standards and charter schools... In recent months, Huffman lost a handful of
political fights.
It carries the implication that climate science is otherwise free of
debate, and that denialist views, rather than having lost the argument by the
standard processes of science, have instead been suppressed by some form of
political correctness.
The White House announcement that it was overruling the Environmental Protection Agency's plan to adopt a stricter
standard for ground - level ozone came just hours after another dismal jobs reports and in the midst of an intensifying
political debate over the impact of federal regulations on job creation