The study was designed as a gold -
standard randomized field trial, in which students were (by means of a lottery) randomly given the opportunity to go to charter schools or not.
Not exact matches
Given differences of opinion among researchers, it is easy to jump to the conclusion that
randomized field trials are not the gold
standard they are thought to be.
Our results came from
randomized field trials, which are generally thought to be the gold
standard for research on human subjects.
I was no less enthusiastic than those standing on the podium as this was for me an opportunity to evaluate for the first time a school voucher initiative by means of a
randomized field trial, the gold
standard for evaluating the effectiveness of a program, the same design as the pill - placebo design used in medical research to ascertain whether pills are effective.
Based on rigorous selection criteria, the authors narrowed the
field to the 19 studies — representing 11 voucher programs — that used
randomized controlled
trial (RCT) methodology — the «gold
standard» for research.
His model predicted, in different
fields of medical research, rates of wrongness roughly corresponding to the observed rates at which findings were later convincingly refuted: 80 percent of non-
randomized studies (by far the most common type) turn out to be wrong, as do 25 percent of supposedly gold -
standard randomized trials, and as much as 10 percent of the platinum -
standard large
randomized trials.»