Watson Relocation Services has been recognized by RELO ®'s Quality Certification Program, the first
standardized measure of quality and performance in the relocation industry.
Not exact matches
The INQR aims to bring new science to traits
of quality,
standardize the
measure of each trait and to identify new traits
of physical, sensory and nutritional
quality.
How Children Succeed introduced readers to an exciting new body
of research showing that the traditional way we
measure children's abilities — through
standardized tests
of their cognitive skills — was missing a crucial dimension: the importance
of so - called non-cognitive skills or character strengths,
qualities like grit, curiosity, conscientiousness, self - control, and optimism.
«
Standardized tests must be worth taking, high
quality, time - limited, fair, fully transparent to students and parents, just one
of multiple
measures, and tied to improving learning.»
His sleep
quality improved by 87 percent,
measured by a
standardized test, and although the sleep
quality had dropped at a 12 - week follow - up, it remained in the «good
quality of sleep» range, according to the study.
Through the adoption
of standardized procedures and pipelines, and the usage
of quality control
measures and cross-validation, our shared goal is to produce high -
quality data that will not only function as a scientific reference catalog, but will also enable comprehensive meta - analyses that could uncover otherwise hidden disease relationships and functional interactions.
Quiz Ref IDLiterature has shown that female physicians may be more likely to adhere to clinical guidelines,1 - 3 provide preventive care more often,4 - 11 use more patient - centered communication,12 - 15 perform as well or better on
standardized examinations, 16 and provide more psychosocial counseling to their patients than do their male peers.14 Although studies suggest differences in practice patterns and process
measures of quality between male and female physicians, these studies have not examined patient outcomes, what we arguably care about the most.
«College and Career Ready» indicators: Many states already include AP, IB, ACT, and SAT achievement in their high school rating systems, and we heartily endorse all
of these
of these
measures, especially those tied to achievement on AP / IB tests, which are precisely the sort
of high -
quality assessments that critics
of dumbed - down
standardized tests have long called for.
And if the underlying
measure of student achievement in these studies was
standardized tests, as was surely the case in many
of them, why are such tests acceptable as
measures of teacher
quality in studies that are meta - analyzed and used indirectly, but unacceptable when they are used directly to assess teacher
quality in a structured research design?
I don't think that the existence
of cheating «gives tacit support to arguments that
standardized testing should not be used in evaluating teachers or for systemic reform,» it seems to demonstrate the problems that occur when reformers use low
quality, and poorly administered,
standardized tests as the primary
measure of teacher
quality.
When it comes to
measuring the
quality of a school, policy leaders tend to embrace
standardized tests as the go - to indicator, whereas parents and community members tend to rely on reputation, word -
of - mouth, and what they perceive with their own eyes.
There are numerous
measures used to determine the
quality of the education that a child is receiving, including
standardized test scores, graduation rates, or accountability ratings.
As educators, we realize that the
quality of a child's education can not be
measured solely by scores on
standardized reading and math tests, which by their nature do not assess students» conceptual thinking, their ability to do research and to evaluate and defend ideas, their skill at written and oral expression, or their success in collaborative or teamwork settings.
Getz, who was one
of 50 principals who signed a letter to New York Education Commission John King citing concerns about the
quality of the spring 2013 assessments, hopes policymakers will acknowledge that
standardized test scores are imperfect
measures of what students are supposed to learn under the new standards.
We need to leave behind
standardized testing as the sole
measure to determine whether students and schools are succeeding or failing, and adopt new models that include rich, curriculum - embedded performance assessments and multiple
measures of assessing school
quality.
And yet,
measures of school
quality — largely based on student
standardized test scores — have long remained disappointingly narrow, unable to capture the full complexity
of school
quality.
Although not the sole
measure,
standardized test scores make up the bulk
of school
quality assessments.
The true
measure of student proficiency, educator effectiveness, and school
quality must be based on more than just students» test scores on a few state
standardized tests.
Standardized test results have been the defining
measure of student achievement and school
quality under the No Child Left Behind Act.
The report is certain to add fuel to the fire in the ongoing debate in California and elsewhere over how to
measure teacher
quality and the effort or resistance
of some government bodies to tie teacher evaluations to
standardized test scores.
Jeb Bush's claim is that the education reform package that he pushed through in Florida has dramatically improved the
quality of education in his state, as
measured by
standardized test scores.
«Education reformers claim that
standardized test scores are an objective
measure of student performance, and school and teacher
quality; thus it is reasonable to attach severe consequences to them.
The accountability system also provides a public record
of how each public school is performing — graduation rates,
standardized test scores, teacher
quality and school safety are all
measured and reported each year.
In the U.S., the results
of standardized tests are the main
measure of school success, but critics say the tests don't capture more nuanced aspects
of school
quality.
The proposed plan instead doubles down on the use
of state
standardized test results by proposing use
of student performance on STAAR Math and Reading as the
measure of school
quality or student success for elementary and middle schools.
Several assessments
of student learning and teacher efficacy will be employed, including (a)
standardized measures of reading comprehension and vocabulary and (b) researcher - developed
measures of content knowledge, reading strategy use, and instructional
quality.
The descriptions
of classroom
quality available in
standardized classroom observation systems provide a standard way
of measuring and noting teachers» strengths and weaknesses and evaluating whether policy initiatives or professional development activities are actually helping improve classroom interactions.
The key priority for ASCD and its members in 2014 is to promote multimetric accountability so that
standardized test scores are not the sole
measure of student achievement, educator effectiveness, or school
quality.
It's a paradox: As U.S. students» scores on
standardized (used as the primary
measure of student learning and school
quality) have risen, their scores on assessments accepted as
measures of deeper learning and critical thinking (like the Programme for International Student Assessment) have plateaued or gone down.
At present, there are no
standardized measures for assessing pre - kindergarten / early elementary classrooms» contributions to child outcome that could be appropriately used in a system
of accountability or professional development focused on classroom
quality.
Clearly, Brooks argues, scores on state - level
standardized tests aren't an accurate
measure of student learning — and shouldn't be relied on as a way to
measure school
quality.
WHEREAS, the San Diego Unified Vision 2020, long - term strategic plan,
Quality Schools in Every Neighborhood, supports and provides for quality teaching, access to broad and challenging curriculum for all students, closing the achievement gap with high expectations for all, and is committed to using multiple formative measures of success that go beyond standardized achievement tes
Quality Schools in Every Neighborhood, supports and provides for
quality teaching, access to broad and challenging curriculum for all students, closing the achievement gap with high expectations for all, and is committed to using multiple formative measures of success that go beyond standardized achievement tes
quality teaching, access to broad and challenging curriculum for all students, closing the achievement gap with high expectations for all, and is committed to using multiple formative
measures of success that go beyond
standardized achievement tests; and
Educational outcomes are shaped by many factors, but research shows that teacher
quality is the most important in - school factor influencing student achievement.59
Of course, other out - of - school factors, which are often caused by poverty, can also influence student outcomes.60 Because teacher quality has been shown to have a measurable impact on standardized test scores, some academics have started trying to directly measure the impact of Act 10 on student outcomes by examining how students fared on standardized tests after its passag
Of course, other out -
of - school factors, which are often caused by poverty, can also influence student outcomes.60 Because teacher quality has been shown to have a measurable impact on standardized test scores, some academics have started trying to directly measure the impact of Act 10 on student outcomes by examining how students fared on standardized tests after its passag
of - school factors, which are often caused by poverty, can also influence student outcomes.60 Because teacher
quality has been shown to have a measurable impact on
standardized test scores, some academics have started trying to directly
measure the impact
of Act 10 on student outcomes by examining how students fared on standardized tests after its passag
of Act 10 on student outcomes by examining how students fared on
standardized tests after its passage.
Standardized tests are being used to
measure things they can not
measure, like school
quality and teacher effectiveness, with deleterious results; such as massive school closures, which destabilize children and communities, and the current troubling shortage
of students willing to enter the teaching profession.
Lessons that will improve the
quality of life, but will never be
measured by a
standardized test.
«We've been so focused on English / language arts and mathematics as
measured by state
standardized tests as the only indicator
of quality and the only thing that matters,» Starr says.
This includes the American Federation
of Teachers, with the help
of another group
of so - called social justice players to lobby against the accountability and
standardized testing
measures that have helped more children gain high -
quality education.
However, with continued concerns over the unintended (and sometimes detrimental) consequences
of expanding
standardized testing, policies have reemphasized the importance
of more traditional, widely applicable approaches to
measuring teacher
quality — specifically, the
quality of teachers» instruction, assessed through classroom observation.
The International Partnership for dogs (IPFD), an independent, multi-stakeholder organization, has been recognized as the appropriate body to create and oversee an online resource to: catalog information from commercial test providers (CTPs) on
measures of quality, host expert reviews
of genetic tests; coordinate a program for
standardizing testing; assemble resources for genetic counselling and education; and provide the foundation for future developments.
The world's largest firms — the 10,000 - lawyer behemoths on the distant horizon — are going to be those that specialize in commodity - type work, the kind
of things that can be automated, templated, algorithmed and
standardized — the kind
of work for which ISO 2001 ratings will be meaningful
measures of quality assurance.
ING US Financial Services (Atlanta, GA) 5/2006 — 2/2009 Six Sigma Black Belt • Responsible for identifying, defining, and implementing continuous improvement (Six Sigma) projects • Communicated
quality management tools and methodologies to project teams • Established and directed process improvement group reporting process • Cut annual process budget by 20 % by reducing testing / production errors through process standardization • Saved $ 350K
of annual business contract production costs through vendor consolidation and elimination
of manual product assembly • Identified $ 2 million in potential annual savings by developing a check processing distribution strategy • Reduced annual expenses by $ 1.7 million through cost avoidance by optimal vendor selection processes • Minimized business risk and legal mitigations by tracking / confirming contract delivery to clients and
standardizing marketing forms practices and control
measures • Mentored Green Belts and team members on their roles and responsibilities
4)
Quality of life defined as subjective evaluations
of both positive and negative aspects
of life covered physical functioning, occupational role, interpersonal relationships and psychological functioning,
measured by validated
standardized including General
Quality of Life Inventory -74 - GQOLI - 74 which
measured physical functioning, psychological functioning, social functioning, and standard
of living; Well - Being scale - WBS,
measure positive aspects
of psychological functioning.
First, children's sustained attention and impulsivity at age 4.5 years partially mediated the relation between parenting
quality (as
measured by a composite index
of physical and social resources in the home, observer ratings
of parental sensitivity and cognitive stimulation) at 4.5 years and children's academic achievement (as
measured by performance on
standardized reading and mathematics tests) at age 6 (NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, 2003).