staff are doing everything possible — openly and overtly — to preserve the nutrition
standards in the school meals program.
Not exact matches
In America, the main nutritional changes in the school lunch program have looked at meal standards to be based on the latest Dietary Guidelines for American
In America, the main nutritional changes
in the school lunch program have looked at meal standards to be based on the latest Dietary Guidelines for American
in the
school lunch program have looked at
meal standards to be based on the latest Dietary Guidelines for Americans.
And there are also many, many things we could be doing to encourage children's acceptance of healthier
school meals: imposing meaningful restrictions on children's junk food advertising; requiring food education
in schools — not just nutrition education, but offering kids a real understanding of our food system, and overtly inoculating them against the allure of hyper - processed and fast food; teaching all children basic cooking skills; getting more gardens into
schools; encouraging restaurants to ditch the
standard breaded - and - fried children's menu; imposing taxes on soda (and even junk food); improving food access; and so much more.
Woldow speculated that, based on the progressive
meal program Ronnei previously oversaw as
school food director
in St. Paul, Minnesota, her election might signal a softening of SNA's current stance against science - based
school nutrition
standards.
Wansink's data happened to appear
in the Times just three months before President Obama signed the Healthy, Hunger - Free Kids Act, a new law that would greatly improve the nutritional
standards for
school meals around the country.
Under the new
standards,
school meals must meet the Dietary Guidelines for Americans established
in 1990 by the Department of Health and Human Services.
Yesterday First Lady Michelle Obama, accompanied by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, released the final federal nutrition
standards for
school meals, representing the first major overhaul of
school food requirements
in over 15 years.
Researchers looked at eleven Massachusetts
school districts from 2011 to 2014, which was one year before and two years after improved
standards for both
meals and snacks took effect
in that state.
Juliana F.W. Cohen, ScD, ScM, the study's lead author, concludes: «Our findings suggest that concerns about
school revenues or participation
in meals programs are not strong arguments for rolling back USDA's healthier
meal and snack
standards.»
I'm aware that the Trump administration may only just be getting started, and that Perdue's May 1st announcement could be the opening salvo
in a larger effort to dismantle healthier
school meal standards.
In doing so, these individuals publicly broke rank with their own organization, which is currently urging Congress to include in the 2015 appropriations bill language which would allow struggling school districts to opt out of healthier meal standard
In doing so, these individuals publicly broke rank with their own organization, which is currently urging Congress to include
in the 2015 appropriations bill language which would allow struggling school districts to opt out of healthier meal standard
in the 2015 appropriations bill language which would allow struggling
school districts to opt out of healthier
meal standards.
The perception
in the media right now is that
school meals are going to be less healthy, and parents won't know which districts are still meeting the
standards [and which have sought waivers].
And when it comes to scratch - cooking, the gold
standard for
school meals in the minds of many parents, Justin thinks the new
school meal standards may actually encourage more reliance on processed food.
She worked as a Nutrition and Wellness Specialist for Hopkins Public
Schools in Hopkins, Minnesota where she worked on menu planning, new
meal pattern
standards, recipe development, Farm to
School, school wellness, and school ga
School,
school wellness, and school ga
school wellness, and
school ga
school gardens.
The AAP's priorities for child nutrition reauthorization are strengthening the WIC program, keeping the nutritional
standards for the
school meals program strong, and addressing childhood hunger and food insecurity during out - of -
school time, especially
in the summer months.
It remains to be seen if SNA's efforts to weaken
school meal standards are successful, something we may not be able to fully assess until the Child Nutrition Reauthorization is completed
in 2015.
Districts of all sizes are utilizing farm to
school programs to teach academic
standards in school gardens, support the local economy through local food purchases for
school meals, and fight childhood obesity and other preventable, food - related diseases.
Ironically enough,
in an «urgent message» SNA sent to its 55,000 members this week to discourage them from signing an open letter supporting healthier
meal standards, the organization reassured
school food professionals that it welcomes their «thoughts and concerns.»
Preparing healthy
meals for students is important work, from adhering to nutrition
standards to handling student food allergies, to the emotional support they provide to their students day
in and day out —
School Nutrition Employee Week is an opportunity to say THANK YOU for the amazing work they do.
That was particularly true when I discovered that one
school superintendent lamenting the egg ban — frequently mentioned by Rep. Robert Aderholt (R - AL)
in his campaign to roll back
meal standards — hailed from a district making almost $ 3 million a year by selling junk food and fast food to kids.
So instead of worrying about DeVos, we really should be focusing on: (1) Congressional Republicans, who've already shown great enthusiasm for weakening the nutrition
standards for
school meals and limiting their accessibility to low - income kids (see my Civil Eats piece, «3 Things You Need to Know About the House School Food Bill «-RRB-; (2) the as - yet - unscheduled confirmation hearing for Agriculture Secretary nominee Sonny Perdue, during which we're likely to get more information on how he views the NSLP; and (3) whoever eventually is appointed Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services, the USDA official directly in charge of child nutrition pro
school meals and limiting their accessibility to low - income kids (see my Civil Eats piece, «3 Things You Need to Know About the House
School Food Bill «-RRB-; (2) the as - yet - unscheduled confirmation hearing for Agriculture Secretary nominee Sonny Perdue, during which we're likely to get more information on how he views the NSLP; and (3) whoever eventually is appointed Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services, the USDA official directly in charge of child nutrition pro
School Food Bill «-RRB-; (2) the as - yet - unscheduled confirmation hearing for Agriculture Secretary nominee Sonny Perdue, during which we're likely to get more information on how he views the NSLP; and (3) whoever eventually is appointed Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services, the USDA official directly
in charge of child nutrition programs.
The
School Nutrition Association (SNA),
in partnership with the United States Department of Agriculture's Food and Nutrition Service Child Nutrition Programs will host a FREE webinar on nutrition
standards for all foods sold
in schools outside of a reimbursable meal, known as the «Smart Snacks in Schools» sta
schools outside of a reimbursable
meal, known as the «Smart Snacks
in Schools» sta
Schools»
standards.
There has been a great deal of progress
in providing healthy
school meals in recent years and these new
standards will help deliver further improvements.»
It is now deeply entrenched
in its strategy to roll back
school meal standards, an effort that's likely to intensify
in the coming year as the
school food law comes up for reauthorization
in Congress.
In particular, there are three aspects of the House bill that ought to especially worry parents, health advocates and those who are concerned about fighting childhood hunger: the bill takes a decidedly unscientific approach to setting
school nutrition
standards, it would most certainly re-open the
school junk food floodgates, and it will drop millions of needy kids from a much - lauded program that currently offers them free
school meals.
Overall, the revised
meal standards and policies appear to have significantly lowered plate waste
in school cafeterias.
That happened
in 2004, when Congress directed the USDA to develop nutrition
standards for
school meal programs that would align with the with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans.
On a related note, to the extent that any of these photos were taken before this
school year, they also don't reflect the huge gains made with the passage of the Healthy, Hunger - Free Kids Act, the first major overhaul to
school meal standards in many years.
Meanwhile, the House Appropriations subcommittee yesterday released its fiscal year 2015 agriculture appropriations bill, which included language that would allow any
school district which operated its
meal program at a loss for at least six months this past
school year to seek a waiver from compliance
in the coming year with the new, healthier
school food
standards.
To be sure, the new federal Smart Snacks and
meal standards are a huge improvement
in school food, and the passage of those rules is an achievement that shouldn't be diminished (or rolled back — ahem, SNA).
(For those who missed it, it's about the FSD
in Cincinnati who is doing a fantastic job
in implementing the new
school meal standards.)
These highly processed foods — sometimes referred to as «copycat» junk food by
school food reform advocates — bear all the same logos and brand names as their supermarket counterparts, but are nutritionally tweaked to comply with the USDA's improved school meal standards and / or its new «Smart Snacks in School»
school food reform advocates — bear all the same logos and brand names as their supermarket counterparts, but are nutritionally tweaked to comply with the USDA's improved
school meal standards and / or its new «Smart Snacks in School»
school meal standards and / or its new «Smart Snacks
in School»
School» rules.
In order to meet the USDA's school meal nutrition standards (which has a protein requirement), the school substituted in more legume
In order to meet the USDA's
school meal nutrition
standards (which has a protein requirement), the
school substituted
in more legume
in more legumes.
The Committee directs the Secretary to issue minimum national
standards to address the ongoing issue of shaming
school children for unpaid
school lunch fees, including
standards that protect children from public embarrassment; that require all communications about unpaid
school lunch fees be directed at the parent or guardian, not the child; and that
schools take additional steps to determine if families falling behind
in their
school lunch fees are
in fact eligible for free or reduced - price
school meals.
Students of color are the largest demographic served by the National
School Lunch Program, yet as we gear up for the fight over healthier school meal standards in Congress this fall, the voices of these critical stakeholders can easily be drowned out... [Continue re
School Lunch Program, yet as we gear up for the fight over healthier
school meal standards in Congress this fall, the voices of these critical stakeholders can easily be drowned out... [Continue re
school meal standards in Congress this fall, the voices of these critical stakeholders can easily be drowned out... [Continue reading]
In several posts written last year, I took the
School Nutrition Association (SNA) to task for not asking Congress for more money to fund healthier school food, instead seeking only to roll - back school meal nutritional standards («School Food... [Continue re
School Nutrition Association (SNA) to task for not asking Congress for more money to fund healthier
school food, instead seeking only to roll - back school meal nutritional standards («School Food... [Continue re
school food, instead seeking only to roll - back
school meal nutritional standards («School Food... [Continue re
school meal nutritional
standards («
School Food... [Continue re
School Food... [Continue reading]
*
Schools say tough to buy different portion sizes * Move follows complaints that rule left some students hungry * Change won't undermine overall healthier
standards - advocates By Susan Heavey WASHINGTON, Dec 10 (Reuters)- U.S. regulators are relaxing
school meal rules aimed at reining
in calories and portion sizes after some students, parents and lawmakers complained that new stricter policies left many children hungry.
We are really
in a transformative moment here
in school meals; this is the first serious upgrade
in nutrition
standards in over 15 years, and the first real increase
in the reimbursement rate for a very long time.
But we've also heard consensus about the challenges: Around funding, around how to procure locally grown food, around how to ensure food safety
standards are met, and how to incorporate better salad bars
in schools in a way that counts for reimbursable
meals.
The
meal was designed to demonstrate lunches CPS kids might eat
in the coming
school year, when officials say nutrition
standards will be raised to the «gold» level across the district.
To ensure that all foods sold
in schools are healthier, Congress directed the U.S. Department of Agriculture to update nutrition
standards for snack foods and beverages and align them with the
school meal guidelines.
The vast majority of Kentucky voters, including parents with children
in public
schools, support the healthy
school meal standards in effect nationwide, according to a poll released today by the Kids» Safe and Healthful Foods Project.
But these are all either run by the
school catering staff themselves or, if bought
in, then are still subject to the same rules as the
school caterer
in terms of availability to all students (on free
meals or not) and
in terms of the nutritional
standards.
But as I explained here
in «Yes,
School Meal Standards Just Got Weaker — But Not As Much As You Think,» that May announcement really only locked
in the status quo on
standards that had already been relaxed during the Obama administration.
While you were served a
meal of meatloaf, mashed potatoes, peas and carrots and a canned pear half, today's children (if they have the financial means) can pay for a
meal of processed «kid fare» which has to meet only the most minimal federal
standards — chips, ice cream, and (particularly if they're
in secondary
school) items like brand - name pizza, breaded chicken sandwiches, Rice Krispie Treats and slushies.
In fact, since the new nutrition standards for school meals went into effect in 2012, average daily participation in NSLP has dropped to 30 millio
In fact, since the new nutrition
standards for
school meals went into effect
in 2012, average daily participation in NSLP has dropped to 30 millio
in 2012, average daily participation
in NSLP has dropped to 30 millio
in NSLP has dropped to 30 million.
The First Lady championed the transformation of the
school food environment through the Healthy, Hunger - Free Kids Act, which updated
school meal nutrition
standards for the first time
in 15 years and increased funding for the first time
in 30 years.
As I outlined
in a piece for Civil Eats, the House CNR bill would have seriously undermined key
school food provisions, including taking a decidedly anti-science approach to
school nutrition
standards, significantly limiting the Community Eligibility Provision (which provides free
meals to students
in low - income areas without paperwork or stigma) and opening the junk food floodgates on
school campuses by gutting the Smart Snacks rules for competitive food.
Still another policy called for by SNA would extend the comment period on the «Smart Snacks
in Schools»
standards which, for the first time ever, will (beginning July 1st) impose some regulations on «competitive foods» sold at
school outside of federal
meal programs, including at a la carte snack bars, vending machines, and student stores.
But she and I are
in complete agreement that the answer to this problem is not taking a giant leap backwards from the recently improved
school meal standards.