Sentences with phrase «standards model predicts»

Now BaBar reports B mesons decaying into tau particles more often than the standard model predicts.

The ATLAS results are allowing some to maintain their hope that the particle thought to be the Higgs is rather different from what the standard model predicts.

Equally, the standard model predicts that matter and antimatter are identical to all intents and purposes.

The thing about the Higgs was that you could predict either: One, the LHC would show it was there; two, it would show it was not there; or three, that it would show it was there but not in the way the standard model predicted.

That's exactly what the standard model predicts for the Higgs boson.

Previously, several teams have glimpsed examples of asymmetry even larger than the standard model predicts.

Although the Standard Model predicts this decay to occur in more than half of all Higgs boson decays, it is very difficult to distinguish from similar background processes.

Now, in an anticlimactic summary on the two photon decay, both big experiments at the LHC have posted results showing the photons are, after all the fuss, also doing exactly what the standard model predicts.

Now, in an anticlimactic summary on the two - photon decay, both big experiments at the LHC have posted results confirming that the photons are, despite much hope, doing exactly what the standard model predicts.

But the behavior was exactly what the Standard Model predicted.

Not exact matches

Supersymmetry predicts that a yet - to - be-discovered partner particle for every particle within the standard model exists.

The Standard Model of physics predicts that all particles have something of a twin; a matching particle that has mirror properties, such as an opposite charge.

This belief is so powerfully embedded in the standard equilibrium models most economists use that, strangely enough, even those of us who described the imbalances in one paragraph and in the very next paragraph insisted that a crisis was unlikely — in China's case because of the government's very high credibility and its role as financial guarantor — were automatically assumed to be predicting an imminent crisis.

[5][6] The theory could potentially explain why a mysterious repulsive form of energy known as the «cosmological constant», and which is accelerating the expansion of the universe, is several orders of magnitude smaller than predicted by the standard Big Bang model.»

Studies show that these models can accurately predict the ways that new drugs will react in the human body and replace the use of animals in exploratory research and many standard drug tests.

When applied to the road networks in actual cities, Transims did better than traditional models at predicting traffic jams and local pollution levels — one reason why Transims - inspired agent - based models are now a standard tool in transportation planning.

The standard model of the early universe predicts that space is full of gravitational waves, ripples in space - time left over from the first instants after the Big Bang.

The standard model has been tested by experiments countless times, and it has never failed to predict what physicists would see.

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC), which this month is preparing to smash protons together at CERN near Geneva, Switzerland, for its third full season, is looking for the definitive trace of the only particle predicted by the standard model still to be discovered — the Higgs boson, giver of mass.

One of the most intriguing oddities to surface in 2012 was that the new particle appeared to decay into pairs of photon more often than our current best theory, the standard model, predicts the Higgs should.

The Standard Model of Physics predicts such one - in - ten - billion odds with an uncertainty of less than ten percent.

«Many previous studies have shown that people's political views can not be predicted by standard economic models,» Petersen explains.

Last year, the LHC blasted out hints of an unexpected new fundamental particle — potentially the first one in decades not predicted by physicists» standard model of fundamental forces and particles.

Physicists look for results inconsistent with those predicted by the Standard Model to expand knowledge of the physical world — but that didn't happen here.

«The news is that the Standard Model has predicted that this B - sub-s meson will decay to two muons very, very rarely, and that is what we've seen.»

The mathematical symmetries of the resulting equations predict three families of particles, as described by the standard model of physics, though the third family would behave a bit differently.

These are important tests because theorists have constructed many hypothetical models that put the Standard Model in a broader framework, and many of these predict multiple bosons or deviations from the usual couplings.

Next, using data from an early clinical trial in women, the researchers created a mathematical model that predicts these ratios in vaginal, cervical and rectal tissues given standard doses of medication taken 2 to 7 days per week.

«Its existence was predicted by the standard model of particle physics and the fact that there's — we got a glimpse of it, it looks like it may very well be there — is a real victory for that model of science where you test, you put forward conceptual models of the way the world or the universe works and test those models against the observations and see the extent to which they can predict new observations and when they do, it gives you increased confidence in the models.

That finding put in place the last piece of the puzzle to complete the standard model of fundamental particles and forces nearly 50 years after Higgs, Englert, and others predicted the existence of the elusive particle.

The standard model of dark matter (cold dark matter model) predicts that once a galaxy cluster has returned to a «relaxed» state after experiencing the turbulence of a merging event, the BCG does not move from the cluster's centre.

That's when they discovered that two neighboring stations on the east coast were uplifting far more rapidly than standard models had predicted.

They hope to firm up tantalizing hints from an earlier incarnation of the experiment, which suggested that the particle is ever so slightly more magnetic than predicted by the prevailing standard model of particle physics.

This pokes a sizable hole in the prevailing theory of particle physics, the Standard Model, which predicts that neutrinos have no mass and can not change type.

(For example, the Standard Model would predict that the probability of two particles having very high energies colliding with one another would be greater than one, a physical impossibility!)

The first is that WIMPs are a natural consequence of the most popular extensions to the Standard Model of particle physics, which predicts their production shortly after the big bang.

If the standard model of particle physics has correctly predicted its characteristics, gathering enough data to find the Higgs should take about two more years, says Albert de Roeck, deputy spokesman for the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) experiment at the LHC.

According to the standard cosmological model, which predicts how the universe has grown and changed since its earliest days, the universe is filled with enormous strands of dark matter, and the galaxies are embedded in this so - called cosmic web.

The standard cosmological model of structure formation in the universe predicts that galaxies are embedded in a cosmic web of matter, most of which is invisible dark matter.

This is 40 times larger than the imbalance predicted by the standard model.

Some have pointed out that a value of 125 GeV would be good news for supersymmetry, a theory that predicts that each particle would have a heavier partner known as a superparticle (at least for particles within the framework of the Standard Model of particle physics, the currently accepted description of the subatomic world).

Many physicists would be thrilled if the Higgs had such exotic «spin - parity,» as it would point to new phenomena not predicted by the standard model.

Rates of certain decays don't quite match those predicted by the standard model.

Without quenching the standard Big Bang model fails to predict the universe as we know it.

One of the major problems faced by the standard form of this model is that it has predicted a star formation rate - speed at which new stars are born - which is far too big.

The Higgs boson was the final piece of the standard model of particle physics, which catalogs the universe's particles and forces and predicts how they interact with each other.

Standard solar models predict both the temperature at the Sun's core and the number of neutrinos generated by the nuclear reactions there.

There are several ways to produce them, as predicted by the theoretical framework known as the Standard Model, and the most common one was the first one discovered: a collision in which the strong nuclear force creates a pair consisting of a top quark and its antimatter cousin, the anti-top quark.

Thus, CMS presents the best measurement at the LHC of the weak - mixing angle, a key parameter of the Standard Model that establishes a firmly predicted relation between the masses of the W and Z bosons.

But over the past year, physicists at CERN have found that the Higgs boson is acting exactly as the incomplete standard model of particle physics predicts, leaving us with no clues about how to extend it.