«Nor can we limit accountability to a small percentage of our schools while ignoring the others, thereby retreating from the long -
standing federal role in ensuring that minority students, low - income students, English learners and students with disabilities have access to... supports that address a range of student needs so that they are better prepared to succeed in the classroom.»
Not exact matches
But he was willing to hold — insisted on holding, for plausible reasons — that the
role of a referendum proponent does not confer
standing to represent the constitutionality of state law in
federal court.
Among the questions: what is working, and not working, in the Build it Back program, the mayor's reaction to a report that a family he visited in the Arverne section of Rockaway is «getting close» to losing faith in the mayor, the scope / number of people still directly affected by Sandy, whether his weekend trip to Pennsylvania involved a meeting with the consultants running the Build it Back program, whether he
stands by statements he made during a September visit to Far Rockaway's St. Mary Star of the Sea, whether the Bloomberg administration allocated enough money to housing from the first tranch of
federal assistance, whether he agrees with Oddo's idea of acquiring land for redevelopment, the
role of Michael DeLoach in Build it Back, whether New Yorkers should be concerned that they may lose desirable options under Build it Back after de Blasio completes his review and issues on elevation of existing structures v. new construction.
Preserving the
Federal Role in Encouraging and Evaluating Education Innovation Brookings, 2/19/15 «The question is whether, in their understandable efforts to rein in Washington's influence, legislators can preserve those elements of federal policy that stand to benefit students and taxpayers — particularly those that fulfill functions that would otherwise go unaddressed within our multi-layered system of education governance.
Federal Role in Encouraging and Evaluating Education Innovation Brookings, 2/19/15 «The question is whether, in their understandable efforts to rein in Washington's influence, legislators can preserve those elements of
federal policy that stand to benefit students and taxpayers — particularly those that fulfill functions that would otherwise go unaddressed within our multi-layered system of education governance.
federal policy that
stand to benefit students and taxpayers — particularly those that fulfill functions that would otherwise go unaddressed within our multi-layered system of education governance.»
And while the ESEA must continue to balance
federal oversight and decisionmaking at the state level, it must ensure that the
federal government retains its long -
standing and crucial
role in safeguarding equal educational opportunity.
Given that the
federal role in education has rewarded a lot of cronies and entrenched a lot of anti-freedom bureaucrats but produced no student achievement gains, and can constitutionally exist only because the feds bribe states with their own money, it's about time someone with power and cojones took a
stand.
With these massive cuts to the Department of Education, Trump and DeVos are again ignoring the long -
standing role of the
federal government in supporting great public schools for all students.
Howard Gardner covers a great deal of territory in this interview, from the
role of the
federal government in education to teacher education to charter schools, but what
stands out most to me is his statement: ``... education in the arts needs no justification in terms of «transfer» to other subjects or to its generation of wealth; it is a «good» in itself.»
Overall, it is clear where he
stands on the
federal role in college affordability.
In this time of uncertainty surrounding the future of
federal arts funding, the Wexner Center, alongside other distinguished arts organizations in Ohio and across our nation,
stands as testament to the NEA's vital
role in encouraging artistic excellence and enriching the cultural conversation in communities throughout the US and beyond.»
The panel's decision disregards long -
standing Supreme Court and
Federal Circuit law that makes it the judge's
role to construe patents.