A planet may have been imaged closer to
its star than any photographed previously, astronomers say.
Not exact matches
Two teams of astronomers made headlines in November after announcing they had
photographed planets orbiting regular
stars other
than our own sun.
It didn't show up in
photographs, even in silhouette, but there had to be a lot of this mysterious dark stuff — more
than 10 times the mass of all the
stars — to keep the Coma cluster from spraying galaxies all over the cosmos.
Other
photographed objects have been too massive to be conclusively labeled planets, falling instead into the brown dwarf category (objects about eight to 80 Jupiters in size that lack sufficient mass to ignite hydrogen fusion in their cores, thereby never becoming true
stars); have been found to themselves orbit brown dwarfs rather
than stars; or have not been shown to be gravitationally bound to a
star.
Two groups of researchers searching for extrasolar planets — planets orbiting
stars other
than our own sun — laid claim today to an astronomy milestone:
photographing extrasolar planets directly, rather
than inferring their presence through effects on their parent
stars.
From among the 150,000
stars photographed every 30 minutes for four years, NASA's Kepler team reported more
than 3,000 planet candidates.
Inspired by the work of Chris Marker, who directed the radical 1962 film «La Jetée,» which consisted of a cinematic sequence of still images, Opie's 22 - minute film is composed of more
than 800 black - and - white images and
stars Stosh, a friend who has appeared in many of her
photographs.
The exhibition features more
than 60
photographs, beginning with Untitled (Movie
Stars on Clouds), made while the artist was still a student at CalArts.
It's similar to why you don't really see
stars in Apollo photos from the moon — the subjects being
photographed were so much brighter
than the background
stars that the exposures weren't long enough to capture the
stars.