The Union has the right to
start enforcing a provision that they have not enforced before, though the line between «consent» and «knowledge» is not a particulary meaningful one in the context.
Not exact matches
If you are so inclined, you may also want to read the recent Washington Post (10.24.16) article, entitled «The big problem with the Obama administration's new teacher - education regulations», in which the chair of Connecticut College's Education Department co-wrote that the «academy
provisions» which were incorporated into ESSA (after initially being developed by the two charter lobbyist organizations New Schools Venture Fund and Relay Graduate School of Education) would exempt «entrepreneurial «
start - up programs» (i.e. teacher preparation «academies»)... from many of the requirements that states will
enforce for other programs — such as hiring faculty who hold advanced degrees or conduct research, holding students to certain credit hours or course sequences, or securing accreditation from the field's accrediting bodies.»
While this is not a simple issue to address, provinces could make a decent
start by appointing designated judges under FHRMIRA, educating reserve residents, police, and social services about its
provisions, and allocating enough money to ensure that those who need orders have help applying for them, and those who have obtained orders can have them
enforced.