Sentences with phrase «start talking about climate change»

I argue that if we take a different approach, like working at the local and regional level and try to facilitate public participation directly in the discussion, then people are more likely to come together, start talking about climate change, plan, connect, and find common ground.

Which means that as more cultural icons start talking about climate change, millions of fans and followers do too.

«When you start talking about climate change and the need for major changes, carbon taxes and lifestyle changes, [conservatives] see this as a threat to capitalism and future prosperity,» said McCright.

If I talk to a buddy on the East coast, I sometimes start talks about climate change by remembering a great time we had searching for trout in the mountains; on the West coast about the great times we used to have eating raw oysters off the beaches — things our children will never get the chance to experience.

«One of the smartest things the other side did is when they got rid of, they quit talking about, global warming and started talking about climate change.

Not exact matches

Well, it just so happens people are starting to talk about it — and it's exposing a yawning gap between two worldviews affecting the way the world responds to the climate change challenge — not least within the energy industry itself.

The other issue is when we talk about doing something about climate change, doing something means to avoid major sea level rise, we need to reduce emissions globally starting today... seven percent per year.

I started talking about the children's health impact, and at the end of the day he came up to me and asked, «So climate change is really linked to our children's health and all of those chemicals?»

I'm pretty sure this is the scientist I heard on local KQED radio today, who started to talk about climate change — he got as far as saying he'd been teaching his students about climate change including this for years, and the fire problem is going to get much worse — and then the radio host cut him off.

Carrying on in this vein he added: «It's time for us to start talking about «climate change» instead of global warming and «conservation» instead of preservation.

I'm in favor of honest talk — what we really do know about climate change and where the remaining uncertainties are, why it makes abundant sense (and will save money) to get started now.

An April column in the Financial Times started a sentence by saying: «With climate change off the political agenda...» People aren't talking about it anymore.

In an interview with Yale Environment 360, the Wesleyan University economist talked about why the world needs to start taking steps to adapt to climate change and why strong action must be taken despite uncertainty about the extent of the warming and its ultimate effects.

But if the biggest sinks start releasing theirs first, well, this is one of the Climate Surprises the IPCC and the U.S. National Climate Change assessment talk about.

The pilots also confirm what marine scientists have just started talking about: Ocean waves are becoming bigger and more powerful, and climate change could be the cause.

First, our hostess stating «(detecting an anthropogenic signal in recent climate change),» I am not sure when I started talking about this, but it surely must be THE key issue, and I am so pleased to see this in Judith's comments.

'' It's time for us to start talking about «climate change» instead of global warming 1.

After decades of talking about actions on climate change, the steps being taken by China and the United States domestically show that both countries are starting to walk the talk.

It looks like it might finally be time to start talking about the big flying elephant in the fight against climate change.

By over more than 20 times the amount (see Milankovitch cycles — recently improved in Wiki) starts the climate relevance: see glacial times...... To the point: I do not talk about ELLIPTICITY CHANGES, they stay constant on millenium scale.

Obama talked about clean energy, then started to back into global warming and climate science («I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change....»)

Is humanity finally and sincerely committed to fighting climate change, or will 2015 be just another year in which we talk, talk, talk about how we seriously need to start getting serious.

In 1996 I defined the turning point of the discussion about climate science (the point where we could actually start talking about policy) as the date when the Wall Street Journal would acknowledge the indisputable and apparent fact of anthropogenic climate change; the year in which it would simply be ridiculous to deny it.

Whenever a potential investment project has finances that rely on governments continuing to talk big but do little about climate change, the project risks becoming non-viable after all the costs of development are spent if the government subsequently starts to take climate change seriously.

But the key point is that we still have several steps in the process before we should start talking about implementing actions to «mitigate» against human - induced climate change, as some are already proposing, invoking the «precautionary principle».

The best way that The Guardian could support the work of Climate Change Scientists is to stop talking about Phil Jones» informal communications and start reading the results of his extensive collaborative and personal research.

They started to talk about the cholera outbreak situation that Haiti is facing now and also the serious challenge of climate change in their countries.