Sentences with phrase «started accepting evidence»

Around the same time, courts in India started accepting evidence from an extremely controversial brain scanning technique called brain electrical oscillation signature (BEOS) profiling.

Not exact matches

I'm happy that we're starting to reach a level of understanding, but you must first realize that a) I am not willing to accept the impossible, however I am willing to accept the highly improbable if there's evidence enough for it.

That's no evidence that Christianity is true, but the religion certainly did start as a cult of personality that followed a charismatic teacher who is generally accepted to be an historical personage.

Christians started to accept the concept of an «old earth», when the evidence against a young earth became overwhelming.

Starting by saying that you need to begin by accepting that God is real before «evidence» supporting this premise materializes simply can't be a trustworthy path towards truth because you can apply that to anything and get the same result.

In the introduction of the book, which ScienceInsider has reviewed, de Mattei criticizes scientists for failing to accept that the theory of evolution isn't supported by evidence and for ideologically denying any metaphysical truth, starting with the existence of a God that created the Universe.

He got the npp for his science work before he started his megavitamin crusade, of which non of his therories have been accepted by the scientific community as there is no evidence that the claims he made were vaild.

Now I'm not denying that a plateau, or at least a slowdown in the rate of warming exists, but I'd like more evidence before I'll accept it started as long as 16 years ago.

If they are persuadable and persuaded by evidence that their opinions are unsupported by the available evidence and / or are capable of critically examining evidence that appears to support their opinion and find fault with it, that tells me far more about someone than the place he or she starts out / happens to currently stand in terms of «accepting» anthropogenic climate change.

Contrarians start demanding «definitive proof» when they're moving the goal - posts in order to avoid accepting evidence - based conclusions that are inconvenient for their position.

This type of phrase has been litigated many times, where a party tries to swoop in at the last minute and accept an offer - particularly the question of when does the trial really commence (answer: most judges have held that it starts once actual evidence is called).