Sentences with phrase «started warming of the atmosphere»

Several massive volcanic eruptions in Siberian Traps, described above, started warming of the atmosphere.

Not exact matches

«Così has a more inviting, unique atmosphere, starting from our hearth with the enticing smell of baking bread to the warm colors of our décor and our friendly staff.»
It may seem surprising to people, but you can look at something like Mars, which has a very thin atmosphere, and you can look at something like Venus which we tend to think of as sort of having this rather heavy, clouded atmosphere, which [is] hellishly warm because of runaway greenhouse effect, and on both of those planets you are seeing this phenomenon of the atmosphere leaking away, is actually what directly has led to those very different outcomes for those planets; the specifics of what happened as the atmosphere started to go in each case [made] all the difference.
All of the committee members and the three co-chairs emphasized the need for businesses to start examining these issues and pressing for public policy solutions now, due to the fact that greenhouse gases emitted today can last in the atmosphere for hundreds of years, effectively «baking in» a certain amount of warming.
To start, a warmer atmosphere creates more evaporation — for every 1 °F of warming, the saturation level is increased by about four percent.
Carbon dioxide emitted at the start of the industrial revolution is still warming the atmosphere today, which is why scientists take into account historical emissions as well as present day ones to work out a country's contribution to climate change.
It is one of the most extreme things they could come up with because they are not able to find the fingerprint of the carbon dioxide warming of the atmosphere so then they started to come up with this new scheme [ocean acidification].
The poles being white reflect heat which is why its critical that we do nt melt the poles more or have black roads) this * is * causing more gloabal warming, white roads would be COOL literally helping to act like the poles... for those of you that understand this PLEASE help promote this idea and you can help now by coating your old tarmac drive with bonded white chippings, start a business doing it, easy cheap startup, loads of demand, you can make as much money doing this as you like, the demand is immense and will grow as the idea catches on) Going back to our oil scenario: These pipelines carry oil to fuel dirty inefficient engines machines that for their 15 year lifespan spew poison gases into our limited atmosphere.
Start your night with pre-dinner drinks at the bar, and when you're ready to eat be sure to take advantage of the al fresco dining in the restaurant's courtyard, or have your meals served in the main dining room and continue to be swept away with it's warm atmosphere and historic charm.
This privileged location makes of the Citymar Indálico hotel the perfect starting point to discover this charming city and its warm atmosphere.
Our activities are warming the world's atmosphere at such a rate that most of our agriculture will be seriously dislocated over the next few decades — even if we were to get down to business now and start controlling our emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
If we wind up emitting an extra gigatonne [billion metric tons] of CO2 into the atmosphere this year, it commits the Earth to a certain amount of additional warming that can't be taken back — a warming that starts to emerge within decades but will still be with us after thousands of years.
@ 48 If your speculation is correct, I assume that another consequence would be that, if / when concentrations of greenhouse gases start to drop, corresponding reductions in surface ocean / land temperatures would take place at a much slower rate than would otherwise be the case: the surplus heat stored in the deep ocean will gradually make its way to the ocean surface, and continue to warm the atmosphere for decades, if not longer.
Earth's atmosphere has already warmed by 0.8 C since the start of the Industrial Revolution in the mid-18th century, and carbon dioxide (CO2) that is being emitted today will linger for centuries to come.
How about if the increase in CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is due to the release of CO2 from the sea as a result of global warming that started 160 years ago?
We've only had 0.8 C warming since humanity started burning fossil fuels and we're already committed over the next 100 years to another 0.6 C warming with what's already in the atmosphere because of the huge time lags in the climate system.
The increased amounts of greenhouse gases our activities are adding to the atmosphere have upset the balance that was in place since the end of the last ice age and the Earth is getting warmer than it was before we started burning large amounts of fossil fuels.
Did warming of the earth ever start, or was it just a variation in the flow of energy between ocean and atmosphere?
CO2 starting warming the world from the very first molecule that entered the atmosphere many hundreds of millions of years ago.
Now, fires are starting to flare around this broad stretch of once - frozen lands rapidly warmed by an unprecedented belching of heat - trapping gasses into the Earth's atmosphere.
A generally accepted answer is that a doubling of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (it turns out that one gets the same value for a doubling regardless of what value one starts from) would perturb the energy balance of Earth about 2 percent, and this would produce about 2 degrees Fahrenheit warming in the absence of feedbacks.
George E. Smith (16:11:36): «''» A generally accepted answer is that a doubling of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (it turns out that one gets the same value for a doubling regardless of what value one starts from) would perturb the energy balance of Earth about 2 percent, and this would produce about 2 degrees Fahrenheit warming in the absence of feedbacks.
While it is true that most of the CO2 - caused warming in the atmosphere was there before humans ever started burning coal and driving SUVs, this is all taken into account by computerized climate models that predict global warming...
In order to meet the evolutionary challenge of an environment that no longer will accept the byproducts of human activity without destroying our future, we will have to care enough about ourselves and future generations to institute new systems and sets of rules that coordinate nationally and internationally our use of the environment, starting with the concentration of warming gases in the atmosphere.
You start with the maximum amount of carbon dioxide that can be put in the atmosphere while still having a reasonable chance to keep global warming below 2C.
Santa's elves got fed up freezing their asses off in slavish servitude to the jolly elf, and so they all went out and bought heaters, fired»em up, and started the polar ice melting,... which scared the crap out of the reindeer — LITERALLY, more crap, which caused more greenhouse gases to enter the atmosphere, which caused more polar warming, which caused more ice to melt, which caused wind patterns to change, thus, driving the wee cloud - warming fairies out of their warm clouds, creating colder temperatures, transferred by the changing wind patterns, intercepted by all Northern Hemisphere unicorns that inhaled it and exhaled it about the continent to produce record cold temperatures.
after the atmosphere corrected to the input of the warmer PDO, now cooling (though there will be the el nino spike followed by the bigger drop off which is plainly evident on the NCEP (not Cato) temperatures since the PDO flip) there was a leveling off and now the drop off starts.
GENEVA - Global warming gases have hit record levels in the world's atmosphere, with concentrations of carbon dioxide up 39 per cent since the start of the industrial era in 1750, the U.N. weather agency said Monday.
Radiation laws of physics demand that if you are going to start an enhanced greenhouse warming you must simultaneously increase the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Since to me (and many scientists, although some wanted a lot more corroborative evidence, which they've also gotten) it makes absolutely no sense to presume that the earth would just go about its merry way and keep the climate nice and relatively stable for us (though this rare actual climate scientist pseudo skeptic seems to think it would, based upon some non scientific belief — see second half of this piece), when the earth changes climate easily as it is, climate is ultimately an expression of energy, it is stabilized (right now) by the oceans and ice sheets, and increasing the number of long term thermal radiation / heat energy absorbing and re radiating molecules to levels not seen on earth in several million years would add an enormous influx of energy to the lower atmosphere earth system, which would mildly warm the air and increasingly transfer energy to the earth over time, which in turn would start to alter those stabilizing systems (and which, with increasing ocean energy retention and accelerating polar ice sheet melting at both ends of the globe, is exactly what we've been seeing) and start to reinforce the same process until a new stases would be reached well after the atmospheric levels of ghg has stabilized.
The latest pause of no warming since 1998 (significant cooling of about.3 degrees if that was the start time) in the vast majority of the atmosphere is strong indication that CAGW climate sensitivity is wrong by a lot.
Ocean and atmosphere models used to predict the evolution of the Earth's climate in real - time started to suggest the potential for a major regime shift in the Pacific, with pronounced warming of the eastern Pacific.
The reason this warms the surface is most easily understood by starting with a simplified model of a purely radiative greenhouse effect that ignores energy transfer in the atmosphere by convection (sensible heat transport) and by the evaporation and condensation of water vapor (latent heat transport).
When the ocean warms further, this balance likely means that sea ice onset will start at even colder temperatures, with the warming atmosphere this will make a refreeze of the Arctic Ocean well into the long night.
As a starting point, I think sat - temps are high enough in the atmosphere to eliminate or minimalize UHI «contamination», but IMO it's not impossible that UHI could produce plumes of localized warm areas above / downwind of large developed regions at sat - temp elevations, but I don't know for sure.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z