The starting point of the debate emanates from the decision in Entrop v. Imperial Oil, which, in essence, stands for the proposition that actual impairment on the job is the necessary basis for the approbation of remedial action by the employer.
Not exact matches
Exactly when things went off the rails is subject to
debate, but many
point to the controversial acquisition
of Compaq Computer in 2001 by HP's then - CEO Carly Fiorina as the
start of the decline.
«We'd prefer to just be helping people get from
point A to
point B, but when the company
starts to succeed, in a city, or in a country, or around the world, you
start to get brought into more and more
of these political
debates.»
It is what has lead me to my veiw that Atheism as a religion, the passion most Atheist have for their
point of view from the
start you may not fall in this category but I'm sure you know someone that does.The same applies to Christians that freak out on someone and
start forcing their view on others, I see that as wrong also if someone asks or brings the
debate to you then by all means
debate but why be rude how does it help?
Scholasticism Theology moved from the monastery to the university Western theology is an intellectual discipline rather than a mystical pursuit Western theology is over-systematized Western Theology is systematized, based on a legal model rather than a philosophical model Western theologians
debate like lawyers, not like rabbis Reformation Catholic reformers were excommunicated and formed Protestant churches Western churches become guarantors
of theological schools
of thought Western church membership is often contingent on fine
points of doctrine Some western Christians believe that definite beliefs are incompatible with tolerance The atmosphere arose in which anyone could
start a church The legal model for western theology intensifies despite the rediscovery
of the East
Most Likely to
Start an Argument Between You and Your Friends: Roger Olson with «Some Thoughts About Conversations /
Debates Between Calvinists and Arminians» «It seems to me that most 5
point Calvinists I know seem bound and determined to believe anything they think the Bible says regardless
of how horrific that may be.
Starting backwards with Coll's fourth
point, that it is what deacons and deaconesses are rather than what they do that is significant for the Church, Coll explains that on the issue
of ordination generally, the «ontological» versus «functional»
debate continues (p207).
This is, possibly, the most vexing issue raised by an agenda - setting book that will be the
starting point of discussion and
debate for years to come.
We need to get to a
point in this
debate where we can
start with the presupposition that 1) both Christian complementarians and Christian egalitarians respect the authority
of Scripture, and 2) both complementarians and egalitarians are selective in their application
of Scripture.
And whilst you are entirely on
point when you say DB represents only potential and is nowhere near the finished article I can promise you if he scores a deciding goal for us tomorrow then the
debate will snowball, and if he
starts knocking a few in for us in the coming months there will be a shed load
of revisionist theories being flung around.
«We want to
point out that in any discussion with our partners we have to
start from a fundamental constitutional principle, the same in the US and Romania, according to which the
debates, decisions and votes in the Parliament take place in the name
of the sovereignty
of the people and can not be the object
of any form
of pressure,» reads the quoted communiqué issued by the heads
of the two Chambers.
So the
starting point of Labour's economic
debate has to change.
While it took almost a full hour - and - a-half for it to be formally acknowledged, what viewers were actually seeing from the
start of the
debate were coalition negotiations unfolding before their very eyes — as the Conservative Party press office
pointed out on Twitter.
The Speaker
points out that MPs keep on using their
points of order to
start a
debate, but says - and this is very interesting - he will continue to allow them because
of the extent
of «anger» in the House.
«Too often in
debates about climate change risk, the
starting point is a presumption that only global warming in excess
of 2 °C represents a threat to humanity,» says climate scientist Michael Mann
of Pennsylvania State University, College Park.
While the theory doesn't completely resolve the origin -
of - life
debate, it provides a common source
of energy for both sides and could be a useful
starting point for a compromise, the authors report in the June issue
of Molecular Biology and Evolution.
Today marks the hump day
of Movie Club, that
point when, if all goes well, we may
start to veer off the trail a bit, not just
debating the high - profile, prestigious, or commercially successful movies
of the year but giving our own individualized props to the misfits, the weirdos, the flops, even the dogs.
The two
starting points to the intrigue are an in - house
debate around a new art installation, a luminous square, in search
of a media gimmick to augment the museum's inclusive profile (and please donors) and a more personal one that involves a street scam, which sees Christian's wallet and phone... plus his heirloom cufflinks, stolen through an impressively contrived drama that could even be considered street art for its ingenious execution.
Amid the rancor
of the current
debate, we have forgotten the very purpose
of evaluation, which is in itself a
starting point.
As the two days
of DBW have unfolded their sessions» scope (we even heard DRM
debated in a breakout session late Thursday), the skill
of the presenters and conference organizers have come to reveal, as one longtime observer put it, that statistics at this
point «
start to seem to mean nothing anymore.»
As SMI Advisory Services
debated the merits
of starting a fund to roughly follow the 50-40-10 strategy allocations, two
points stood out.
There are theoretically more complex strategies and products on both sides
of this
debate, but both practically and for policy purposes, an empirical investigation into the basic choices is an excellent
starting point for discussion.
(ref) Dean2015.pdf - although how helpful, at what
point they should
start to be used and their optimum dose is still a matter
of debate.
Poll: 2 out
of 3 would stop using their card if iRS
starts taxing rewards
points — A CreditCards.com poll shows consumers really hate the idea
of having their rewards
points taxed — a possibility card and tax experts are
starting to
debate... (See Taxing miles,
points)
Intelligent humor is part
of his critique which hits at the core values
of the society that he is looking at and creates a
starting point for social
debate.
There are significant
debates over when to mark the
starting point or lower boundary
of the Anthropocene in the time scale.
It shouldn't be necessary since the
point should have been crystal clear from the
start, but this is an unusual situation, where confirmation bias runs riot over critical thinking, to the detriment
of meaningful
debate.
«We need to stop
debating the existence
of tipping
points in the Arctic and
start managing the reality
of dangerous climate change.
Trend lines will always be subject to the
debate of start and end
points and significance.
In this
debate, I think it important that the scientists involved, if they think that despite the uncertainties, we know enough that it makes excellent sense to
start on a serious program
of reducing CO2 emissions, then
point needs to be made clear.
I think a lot
of people, including politicians, are
starting to notice this
point, because if you look at the late 90's the
debate was all about the crisis
of global warming, but now they've suddenly changed the name to «climate change» instead.
Mazza also addresses concerns around the food versus fuel
debate, acknowledging that there is a very real concern when energy needs
start to compete with the need
of folks to eat, but he also
points out that, contrary to recent headlines, fuels are hardly the only factor driving up the price
of food:
«At the
start of the book's passage on Hot air and global warming, she notes that there is «a vast amount
of highly technical material on these matters» but
points out that «thankfully, the issues have been clearly analysed and
debated by scholars in the United States» before providing a long list
of publications by «free market» lobby groups, such as the Cato Institute and the Heritage Foundation.
«Too often in
debates about climate change risk, the
starting point is a presumption that only global warming in excess
of 2 °C represents a threat to humanity,» says climate scientist Michael Mann
of Pennsylvania State University, College Park.
Given that you are keen to see Chris» response to the graph
debated, do you agree that the choice
of 1998 as a
starting point is, at best, silly and (much more likely), at worst, dishonest cherrypicking.
The new report acknowledges the
debate over the suitability
of comparison sites, but says its «
starting point» is that they are likely to have «an increasing influence on consumer choice and so the focus as the market emerges should be on maximising the benefits while protecting consumers from the potential risks».
How we deconstruct that decade is a fair subject for
debate but the
starting point must be that the length
of sentence pronounced by the Judge is all that we have to work with.
Whilst there has been a
debate as to whether the aims
of competition should be particular versions
of welfare and efficiency, a much more interesting question is the moral and political
starting -
points for these ostensibly economic issues.
The main reason is that Samsung was finally
starting to charge a higher premium than the iPhone, where traditionally the undercut has been one
of its key selling
points in the Apple vs Samsung
debate consumers go through.
GP, Dr Tim Senior, proposed the Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service model as an excellent
starting point for thinking about meaningful reform, and said the Aboriginal definition
of health also had a lot to offer in equity
debates.
How we go about instilling that emotional literacy is a matter for
debate, but as with any kind
of educative proposal, early intervention would seem to be the natural
starting point.
The issue also offers an array
of helpful answers to frequently asked questions answered by local divorce lawyers and other divorce professionals, a financial health check - up quiz, and an overview
of the
debate on whether 50/50 joint custody by parents should be the
starting point in any divorce settlement.
After a few heated
debates in Sainsbury's and lots
of pointing at the price tag, parents will
start to pick up on it too.