Having a common
starting point would make the legal work easier on the lawyers and the client.
Not exact matches
Mr. Guillebeau
has many
points to
make, but I will sum up a few of them below: You don't need a lot of money to
start a business.
With that much money at stake, it
would only
make sense that crypto holdings will
start to become a major focal
point in IRS audits.
«The technology
has gotten mature to the
point that it's now pretty easy to
make the Silicon
start - up model work to get into the drone business,» Anderson said.
Spirit Airlines
had nickel and dimed me with extra fees to the
point where this flight was now more expensive than most, but the cramped quarters, piercing glares from the staff, and the weird vibe as I boarded were
starting to
make me wonder: Is this the worst airline ever?
«It
starts at the
point from which the deals are
made and continues to how the films are actually produced, to the way they're positioned for a release date, to the way marketing empowers people to watch — and we
've seen all these elements falling into place.»
Using a general template that you
've crafted as a
starting point is fine, but you need to put in a little something extra to really
make you stand out.
But he implied that it
would be patriotic for private Russian citizens to «
start making contributions — which are right, from their
point of view — to the fight against those who say bad things about Russia.»
While many companies
started out using social media to get the word out about products, the most successful
have significantly expanded their efforts to engage their customers at every step of what we call the «customer corridor,» touch
points that
start when a potential customer first learns of a product and extend through the moment they opt to
make repeat purchases.
Bitcoin
had made progress over the years to the
point of retailers
starting to offer it as a payment option.
«Part of our Sector Weight thesis longer term
has been the view that at some
point, investors might
start to care that a significant portion... of the company's gross profit pool was no longer growing, and so while investors largely care about Model 3 for the moment, that S / X continue to
point toward these trends
makes multiple expansion arguments more challenging,» analysts Elliot Arnson and Brad Erickson said in a Wednesday note.
At the time of an IPO and subsequent underwritten public offerings, underwriters will
have the ability to dictate whether investors are allowed to sell, which
makes the registration rights negotiated at the time of the venture financing a mere
starting point for discussions with the company and the underwriters.
You
have to just be patient and go through the process and I tell people plan on two to six months to get to the
point where they
have enough information and clarity to
make the jump and
start doing business.
Use language appropriate to the visitor based on the target audience Heat maps show an F pattern is used when scanning content, so using bold headings and sub-headings to
make it easier to scan and break up a copy Change paragraphs to bulleted lists Put the main
point first (inverted pyramid) Use personal pronouns Put yourself in the place of the visitor and consider questions the visitor may
have, then get to the
point with the answer Add links, if appropriate, to keep the visitor engaged on your site and to keep them from searching elsewhere Name links (and anchor text) in a way that the visitor will know what to expect when they click Find out what keywords visitors are searching for to reach your site and write with these keywords in mind These tips are a great
starting point for anyone wanting to optimize their website content.
It
would be equally unfair to use your belief that God is imaginary,» Using your god as the
starting point makes your argument circular, hence worthless.
So, because you're now convinced the universe
had a
starting point, you
make the leap to this proves it was created by some god!?!?!?!?
«Our understanding from the
start has been that at some
point, a recommendation
would be
made to the LWF Membership Committee, who
would decide whether or not to bring our application to the LWF Council,» Bishop Bradosky writes.
But it's enough to
point out that today it's possible to
start a company in Chicago to
have products designed in Japan that are
made in Thailand to be sold in India.
He
makes tremendous
points and I
start wondering if I
have been fooled.
And they got upset and were trying to figure things out and finally became so frustrated that the Law was so hard to follow and God kept sending them into captivity and there was so much death and eventually the prophets
started prophesying about a day that
would come where the hearts of the fathers
would return to their children and a sacrifice that
would be the final sacrifice so that they could all stop killing so many animals (which God also admitted He never wanted in the first place because that was not the
point), and also that God
would eventually wipe out the old system and write his law on their hearts and minds so that they could finally follow him without
making so many mistakes and messing up everything.
In addition to the lack of coordination among the bilateral and multilateral dialogues and to the problem of achieving, within the Churches, a binding reception of the results of dialogue, Raiser mentions one reason in particular that
makes this reception of the results of dialogue difficult: «The paths thus far traveled «in the ecumenical movement
have taken the separated Churches as their
starting point and sought to overcome the division by convergence and formal agreement.»
But when things
start to get difficult — when we give in to temptation, find ourselves engaging in the very patterns we're trying to break or regret the choices we
've made — we can despair and believe there isn't any
point in trying to change.
My last
point and Im out... Throughout our great nations history... we always found a way to fight through national issues and come up with solutions... Giving the problems we
have now to people in the 50's and 60's... and they may actually come up with a solution... if you earnestly care about
making a change...
start at the lowest levels of government... go do something... find out costs... expenses... how to get more health care to people... do things like that... quit waiting on the government to provide all the answers... its not the way this country was founded... and not the way we get through problems... If you or ur family does nt
have insurance... get a job that can provide you that... instead of hoping the government will do so... If you or ur family lacks access to education... move to an area that excels at it... education is invaluable... Do something about your problem... and quit waiting for the next big lotto...
This begins with a historical statement, namely (to use our words), that the
starting -
point of the message of Jesus in the synoptic gospels is the authority of Jesus to proclaim the Kingdom and to gather together Jew and «Jew who
had made himself as Gentile» into the table - fellowship of that Kingdom.
He got really incensed when this was
pointed out to him and
started RE-POSTING the same quotes with snide little asides like «shh» and «mum's the word» as if that
would make a difference.
Now, my grandmother's mandelbrot is a well - kept family secret, but I figured since I liked the texture so much, that they
would make a good
starting point for these rosemary chocolate biscotti.
I
made enough changes to suit my cooking style and our families tastes that I thought I
'd should share my tweaks but I definitely used her recipe as a
starting point.
I do plan to hack Better Batter, but I don't plan to use this blend as the
starting point since I don't plan to
make this blend again once I
have used up the component rice flours and starches I currently
have on hand.
If you haven't
made overnight oats before, here are few
starting points.
Use the SAUTE function, to
start, and once you
've made it to the
point where you
've added all the ingredients, press CANCEL.
I was at a
point in my life where I wanted to figure out how I could
make a difference in the world, and realised that I didn't know where to
start because I
had never cared about being informed.
These
would be a good
starting point if you are new to
making sushi as they really are very easy with pretty standard flavours.
he
has made some good
points big decision for arsene tommorow whether he rest Alexis or play as far as I am concerned we can't risk any more injuries so rest Alexis for tommorow game and introduce him as a sub in last 20 - 25 min he looks really jaded of late but knowing both Alexis and Wenger I wouldn't be surprised to see him
start also should rest cazorla he
has played non stop for us.
If we
start this season with those two in our
starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing
has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this
point because they represent the settling half - measures that
have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't
have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they
have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department
has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once
had... furthermore, when you leave all decision -
making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually
make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what
would make positional sense...
have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager
would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again
They know what I ask so they
have a
starting point, how difficult can that be for them to
make a decision?
«The FIFA ExCo
has the power to
make decisions and if at the FIFA ExCo this issue
starts to be a real
point for discussion then why not, and then again maybe the FIFA ExCo will say based on medical reports or whatever we really
have to look at playing the World Cup not in summer, but in winter,» he said.
United
have made a poor
start season, with only 13
points from the 10 games so far this campaign.
On a serious note, Blackburn
have made a decent
start to the new Championship season and currently sit second, with 8
points from four games.
The Swans
have made a slow
start to the season and currently find themselves in 17th position with just four
points in seven games.
The Gunners kept coming though and Villa were just
starting to look like they might
make it to the break all square after an amazing block
had denied Theo from
point blank range and Ramsey
had missed a couple.
The Blues
have made an awful
start to the defence of their Premier League title this season as back - to - back defeats against Crystal Palace and Everton
has left them 11
points behind current leaders Manchester City and could fall even further behind if they fail to take all three
points against the Gunners.
We
had a slim chance to catch Chelsea at the end of the season but like Wenger
pointed out, our poor
start of the season
made the hill too steep to climb.
One of the reasons that the UFC
has gotten so popular is that they can generally just
make the fights people want to see without lengthy contract disputes holding them up until it gets to the
point where real fans
start to lose interest.
All of us are going to
have different opinions on formations and who should
start when where etc but i think allot of us
would worry for this squad if we tried
making big changes at this
point.
Carlos Boozer
started off hot, scoring 10 of the team's first 14
points, and the team
has vastly improved their shooting,
making 47.5 percent of their field goals in the first half.
When Arsenal were five
points clear at the top of the Premier League table at the
start of the calendar year, most Arsenal fans were not too bothered about the FA cup apart from the fact that it
would have made a nice double and
would have looked good in the Emirates trophy room standing next to the Premier League trophy.
So today people are confessing that Szczesny is better than Ospina.It was funny how it was
made to look Szczesny was the cause of Arsenal's goals because of his mistakes.People also forget the kind of defence he's
had in front of him from the time he
started till he went on loan.I can't believe anyone watches Ospina and Szczesny in terms of goal keeping ability and says Ospina is better.When Ospina first came he was also
making the same mistakes Szczesny
made but some ignored it insisting he was better.I
'd like to see Ospina go to AS Roma and do better than Szczesny.Even Juventus are in for him even if their bid is derisory.Some also said the fact that Ospina
had a cool head over Szczesny meant he should
start over him.If you
've watched Ospina and Szczesny well from a neutral
point and not being bias you'll clearly know who's better.If I was Szczesny I won't return because I'm in my prime.
if the Ox was played to either showcase his skills or to increase any potential bids because of his perceived importance to our
starting 11, this was an incredibly risky move that could
have cost us dearly... imagine if he was injured or played poorly, like he did, and this negatively impacted our ability to get the best available deal... more importantly, why was Wenger willing to play someone who obviously wants out in such an important game under false pretenses... this kind of behaviour might be less offensive in April, when things are done and dusted, but to do this following a loss against a supposed main rival that pipped us for fourth by a
point last year, could be considered at best inappropriate and at worst treasonous... we can't afford to let this coach
make business decisions on game day, which
has gone on for far too long
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play
has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few
would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't
have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can
make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we
have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to
have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I
have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might
have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi
has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we
've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he
would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly
makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I
've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some
points in the latter part of last season... it always
made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and
has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he
had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we
have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez,
make little to no sense considering what he
has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual
would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular
starting eleven; I
would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I
had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it
would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we
've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't
make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he
has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger
has traditionally employed that
would even suggest such a player
would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he
has some special skills and, at times,
has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who
would be our best
starting 11, I don't
have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
why did we play Welbeck in the striker's role... no one can question his heart but to
have a player with such limited first - touch and finishing skills against such a game opponent with Lacazette on the bench is almost unforgivable... maybe it's because Welbeck tows the party line or maybe it's because Welbeck doesn't know anything but 100 % on the pitch, unfortunately neither of these qualities
makes him a capable
starting striker on a team with any real aspirations... I can only hope that he was being showcased for a move elsewhere, as there was some talk last week about some interest from Everton... if he moved on that
would be the only silver lining of this coach's decision, but once again it wouldn't excuse this club for putting business decisions ahead of fielding the best possible team to secure 3
points at Anfield