Sentences with phrase «starts as a sub»

Every time he starts as a sub, he seems to be fired up to make a point!

We expect him to start as sub once again, with the trio of Cesar Azpilicueta, David Luiz and Gary Cahill set to play.

«If Torreira does arrive, then he will likely start as a sub.

Not exact matches

I would start Walcott and use Giroud as an impact sub rather than use Theo the impact sub.

Giroud as a sub is good but when he starts he is not so good.

England international winger Wilfried Zaha has managed just two sub starts in the Premier League but is already an unwanted member of the Man United squad though the 21 year old is said to be the subject of interest from his former side Crystal Palace as well as West Ham and Nottingham Forest

He may not be starting, but I can't fanthom why he wasn't even playing as a sub or in cup games.

Flamini out for Soton game but available as a sub for next 6 games where Coq started.

So it is important he doesn't automatically becoem a regular, just comes in as subs in some games and in other he starts, it makes him better as well.

I'd love to see Walcott start and Giroud on as an impact sub.

Maybe be used as a sub but he definitely won't start.

I think he will be used as a sub against City and I hope he gets a starts soon after that.

he has made some good points big decision for arsene tommorow whether he rest Alexis or play as far as I am concerned we can't risk any more injuries so rest Alexis for tommorow game and introduce him as a sub in last 20 - 25 min he looks really jaded of late but knowing both Alexis and Wenger I wouldn't be surprised to see him start also should rest cazorla he has played non stop for us.

But if I am allowed to tinker with this emerging Boss» preferred first team starters, I will first start Walcott centrally and later sub Ramsey with Giroud if Ramsey is not effective on the wing as he cuts in centrally.

I started Rosicky alongside Coquelin in my starts but as Rosicky wasn't available to play, it was appropriate to start Ramsey (not as a sub.)

His first FA cup start was back in 2010 and Coquelin endured a tough game at right back and was subbed by Arsene Wenger as Arsenal went on to lose the game to Stoke City.

I've always maintained my stance that Arsene Wenger loves French players in his team than any other players.No matter how average you are once you're French and once you're in the first team he tends to give you so many chances to prove yourself.I can start mentioning them if you want me to but I know you know them.If Lucas Perez was French he wouldn't have been out so early believe me.I just don't know where to begin.Was Giroud bought to become a super sub or to be the leading striker?Having giving us many sesons of failure people are now content with him being a so called super sub.A player like Giroud is not built for that kind of role.He ws a super sub in 99 % of those matches because he was not played when he was supposed to and we needed presence in the air.The funny thing is people are using only this season to label him as a super sub.There were so many matched that Wenger should have started Giroud but for some reason didn't start him.I only see Arsenal as the top club who'd be crying over Giroud.If a good offer comes we should sell.

Cazorla has recently performed well, so he might start on the LW with OX coming on as an impact sub.

Arsene Wenger started with Olivier Giroud as striker in that game, and took a chance of putting Alexis on as a sub, despite only being with the squad for one week.

Although I didn't like Ramsey starting on the wing, I think it was right decision, as it gave us extra defensive cover over the Ox, and subbing Coq and Ozil for Ox and Giroud was also the correct decision, to protect Coq (although that wouldn't have been necessary if we'd have got a backup DM like everyone was telling him), and give us more attacking power over Ozil.

I still don't see how he is a super sub.He's labelled as a super sub just because of this season.Those matches when he scored he was supposed to be played because we needed an aerial presence.A lot of those matches had he started we could've won because we needed aerial presence.But the thing is that his abilities don't suit him as a super sub.I mean he holds up the ball well and is great in the air and that's just about it.He's actually the one one who needs service and who needs players around him to open up defences for him to receive the pass and not vice versa.Super subs actually provide they are not the one's to be provided for.In Giroud's case he was supposed to start in those in matches as Sanchez was not up to the task in aerial battles.Giroud will not be able to affect a match if the opponents are as good in the air.

Me too Greg but want to see him speed back when lost poses ion and I'll be happy with him but I think come on as sub 65th to be be best for him as we need him for City game to start with Oxy rested and come on for him 60th to blitz the buggers 3 points and top 3 looking good CB

This is how it goes (est. since 2008): 1) Jack He will start to have a run of games as sub; 2) Jack will gradually integrate back into the game after 8 game; 3) Jack will overstretch in a challenge; 4) Jack will be on the receiving end of a bad tackle; 5) Jack will break and be out for 12 months, or, Jack will strain and be out for 3 months

Morgan started out as a sub but was inserted at the start of the second half.

My opinion, as Arsene's tendency, Rambo will come as starting, Joey will come as subs.

Arsenal fans are quick to say Giroud is on form but to be honest he's better as a sub, every time he starts he puts in a typical woeful Giroud performance of slowing up our play!

The OX just need to show consistency, and make the most of when he starts When he comes on as a sub he looks promising and exciting but when he starts he doesn't show that, i really do nt know why but he has the potential, wwhen he gets on his bike nobody can stop him if he adds the end product, we'll have top class player

That is why every team as a manger, It is down to the manger to make sure we have a very good squad, Not a good starting 11 and a few good subs and the rest of the squad made up of average players, The fact is it all comes down to the manger!!!!!! he as been there for years each and every player is his choice,

It really was nowhere near as bad as people are making out... 1200 odd minutes in the Serie A as sporadic sub appearances as the occasional start.

or start with walcott with giroud coming on as a sub.

Giroud has his flaws but you have to admit he has a role in our team, though for most as an impact sub or start depending on the opposition of the day.

I have come back from Charlton, gone into the team as a sub and now I'm in the starting XI, so I am really pleased with things at the minute.

I tend to think of it as, slow start again, missed chances, certain players going missing during games, wrong subs wrong time and the quality of the subs.

Maybe a bit of time as a sub at the end would be good for Jack and then next up for the Gunners is a game against Swansea, whose passing style is a much more suitable game for Jack to start.

Chech (Ospina) Bellerin (Jenkinson), Mustafi (Mertesacker), Koscielny (Gabriel), Monreal (Gibbs) Xhaka (Elneny) Cazorla (Ramsey) Walcott (Ox), Özil (Cazorla), Iwobi (Sanchez) Sanchez (Giroud) We have so many players competing for the same starting positions, even being selected as a sub is difficult if you're a CB or MF.

whether there will be buses or trains, this should be a must win game bt plz no start for OG and Rambo.let them come as subs.

With Alexis Sanchez fit he will definitely start and I think Walcott will as well as he only came on as a late sub yesterday.

but it doesn't happen often, in my opinion he needs to be started and subbed more, or just started off, or used as a super sub.

For starters, there is no way Barca would entertain bringing in a wannabe striker that has only started 16 games in the last three seasons, and I doubt he actually completed 90 minutes in more than a handfull of those, with another 16 appearances when he came on as a replacement sub.

Often used as an impact sub by Mourinho this season, it could surely be argued that Anthony Martial has done enough in those brief appearances to show he should be starting more games.

He has started 19 of the 20 Premier League games, coming on as a sub in the other, and four of the six Champions League games.

He is a very good striker and if he had to start he would do fine I am sick to death of defending him Giroud has scored 3 goals in 5 PL matches (as a sub) He has scored 2 CL goals so far 87 Goals Total for us since he joined # 1 last season in headed goals in the PL 6th Top scorer last season with 16 goals (taking into account a 12 match goalless spell) He is far from bad

Wenger should start the ox against stoke and bring on theo as a sub!

i hate it when people put down some of our players it's time they realise that we need a full squad to win trophies and not just 11 players, as we have seen since the start of the season the benefits of being able to rotate players, our subs won / drew us few games, please support all 25 players!!

Let's hope MBappe will look at Martial and Rashford and think it is too much risk of bench time then look at Giroud who was used as a sub and think «okay, looks a good start» then he will look at Welbeck and prob think «Fcuk me, can I play as much as they will need me too...» XD

We should use him more in league matches too... I noticed the Ox is always full of mistake and hardly perform each time he starts a match, he's always more better when he comes on as a sub to play against tiring legs.

Subbing Theo and Alexis off would suggest they will start against M'brough as well.

Just use him as a sub, if he plays really well give him an odd start.

I would give Elneny only 60 minutes since I would like him to start against West Brom and would not even be upset if he comes on as a 30 minute sub for Flamini or Chambers.

Also would love to see Poldi starting on the left with Welbeck up front and Giroud on the bench as an impact sub.