But fair is fair, and just because Benedict starts with the Church doesn't make him any more fanatical than the atheist who
starts with atheism and the atheist intellectual tradition.
Not exact matches
«The atheist group American Atheists has raised enough money to
start spreading the word — not to be confused
with «The Word» — about
atheism.
Just because most wars are
started for non-religious purposes doesn't automatically associate them
with atheism or secular humanism.
I think my question to those of you who couple
atheism with evolution and climate change is: how can we as scientists even
start trying to inform you about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?
I think my question to those of you who couple evil
atheism with evolution, the big bang, and climate change is: how can we as scientists even
start trying to inform you about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?
Regardless, my initial sentence is about the discussion on morality, where you
started again from scratch
with on
atheism as if we hadn't been discussing anything for the past hour or so.
Atheism needs to mature and
start getting
with the times.
Economics might seem like a poor place to
start a Christian fight - back against methodological
atheism, since it deals largely
with issues that Christians have generally considered of minor importance — the body's daily needs and occupations.