New Jersey's highest court has considered whether
state constitutional protections for free speech apply to a private homeowners» association enforcement of its rules and regulations against fellow homeowners.
Many of these states even include greater
state constitutional protections for a woman's right to choose than the federal Constitution.
No state constitutional protections.
The court sided with the government's argument that federal law trumps
state constitutional protections of retirement funds when it comes to forfeiture.
Not exact matches
Danielle Keats Citron, a law professor at the University of Maryland,
states in the New York Times, «Hateful, offensive and distasteful ideas enjoy
constitutional protection.»
Washington
state argued that it violated
constitutional protections against religious discrimination.
Constitutional Amendment 14 (this one specifically applies to Pan's Bill): ``... No
State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United
States; nor shall any
State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.»
While I don't object to a
constitutional amendment that would extend special
protection to unborn persons - especially since such an amendment would presumably lodge
protection for the unborn beyond the discretion of partisan courts, and also dispose of any potential problems with respect to
state action - such an amendment is constitutionally superfluous.
When any religion, in this case islam, espouses ideas that are in direct conflict with the Constitution and openly work to impose an alien political / religious system called sharia on the United
States, at some point the right to claim
constitutional protection is lost.
The statement suggested two legal remedies: first, the Supreme Court could reverse Roe, returning the issue to the
states; second, the nation could pass a
constitutional amendment that would extend Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due process
protection to unborn persons.
Its curators» decisions to display particular objects, such as the Artifact, in the Museum are not
state actions to which
Constitutional protections apply.»
The decision on Friday will open marriage legally in the remaining fourteen
states, and will give new legal
protection for those who got married under court rulings that actually could not be considered truly final until the Supreme Court itself had decided the
constitutional question.
Virtually the entire Bill of Rights has now been applied against the
states, achieving three revolutionary results at once: 1) The original understanding of federalism has been obliterated, so that the
states exercise their power now largely at the sufferance of the Supreme Court; 2) The Due Process and Equal
Protection clauses of Section 1 have become a kind of witches» cauldron from which an exotic brew of postmodern nostrums has been fed into the bloodstream of the political culture; 3) The Supreme Court has successfully arrogated to itself more or less exclusive powers of
constitutional interpretation.
If one took the majority's assertions seriously, as Scalia's dissent noted,
state constitutional provisions prohibiting polygamy would violate the equal
protection principle.
Having referred to the
constitutional protection given in earlier cases to «personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education,» the opinion
stated:
A group of
constitutional law and government professors have signed on to a letter outlining why they back a
constitutional convention, arguing that holding one will positively restructure
state government and expand
protections for the environment and local governments.
91 Per David Lammy MP (Parliamentary Under - Secretary of
State for
Constitutional Affairs): «The
protection has been given to the Church in Wales, at its request, but the Church of England has said clearly that it does not want it.»
Normally, that by itself, should shield any one of the
states which enacted Traditional Marriage
protections against interlopers entering the
state and demanding that their fake Sodomite «marriage» be recognized as valid, but in this day and age of a runaway judiciary, it is best that we somehow pass a
Constitutional Amendment defining Traditional Marriage and / or slapping the hands of rogue jurists away from the issue altogether.
Without this
constitutional protection,
state and local pension funds could be raided like a piggybank to pay for other obligations.
Samuels is pursuing a
constitutional convention and the passage of a slate of amendments to the
state's governing document that range from election and campaign finance reforms, environmental
protections and equal rights.
Labor unions are leading the fight against a New York ballot measure to hold a
constitutional convention, arguing that it's just too risky to tinker with the
state's governing document and threaten existing
protections for worker's compensation, unemployment benefits and collective bargaining.
The suits claim the
state violated CSEA - represented employees»
constitutional rights to freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process and equal
protection of the law when, during contract negotiations, it threatened to and did in fact, lay off CSEA represented workers, while sparing all management employees and political appointees.
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo told a crowd of cheering Planned Parenthood advocates that he's proposing a
constitutional Amendment to put the
protections in the Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade into the
state's constitution.
ALBANY, N.Y. (WBEN / AP)-- Labor unions are leading the fight against a New York ballot measure to hold a
constitutional convention, arguing that it's just too risky to tinker with the
state's governing document and threaten existing
protections for worker's compensation, unemployment benefits and...
In Illinois, another
state with a
constitutional protection for government - worker pensions, the governor recently signed legislation that would raise the retirement age for mid-career workers and reduce cost - of - living adjustments for all workers who have not yet retired.
Lawyers for Minnesota's public - employee unions say that
state's law, passed last December to help close a $ 312 - million budget deficit, is unconstitutional because it abrogates the workers»
constitutional claims to contract and equal -
protection rights.
Florida is one of only five
states with a
constitutional protection for collective bargaining rights, though the language is strangely ambiguous.
The commission, a 37 - member group that meets every 20 years to consider changes to the
state constitution, has been holding a series of public hearings on the school plan and other proposals, including one to provide
constitutional protection for affirmative action programs.
In a big victory for gay rights, the U.S. Supreme Court last week struck down a Colorado
constitutional amendment that invalidated
state and local legal
protections for homosexuals.
Because
states like Illinois have
constitutional protections that lock in benefits for existing workers, the only way for
state and local governments to address funding problems is to target new workers.
Regarding the first two groups, without running afoul of
constitutional protections,
states can curtail retiree health care, as Wisconsin and Ohio did, which frees up some resources to apply to immutable pension obligations.
It was timely, then, when in 2014 Campbell Brown and the Partnership for Educational Justice brought a suit called Wright v. New York that «was inspired by a California court decision a few months earlier, when a judge ruled the
state's tenure
protections denied California's students their
constitutional right to a sound and basic education.»
that «was inspired by a California court decision a few months earlier, when a judge ruled the
state's tenure
protections denied California's students their
constitutional right to a sound and basic education.»
The far - reaching question underlying the case is whether
state constitutional provisions that strictly bar government aid to religion violate religious freedom
protections in the First Amendment.
ACLU - CT, David McGuire primarily focused on civil liberties
protections for students in regards to baseless searches and seizures of students» personal electronic devices and passwords citing «the patchwork of unequal privacy policies» used in districts around the
state, urging the committee to expand
protections in the bill that would uphold students
Constitutional 14th amendments rights.
The President of Slovakia uses various vehicles from the Office for the
Protection of
Constitutional Officials and Diplomatic Missions which has more than 230 cars for the president, prime minister, ministers and
state visits.
Instead, it gives
constitutional protection to corporations who profit off industrial farming, entrusting them, and not local and
state officials, to decide what's best for Oklahomans» public welfare.
In 2013, a couple of months after these decisions were issued, the German Federal
Constitutional Court took the opportunity in a fundamental rights case to mention the Fransson judgment to openly warn legal operators (the CJEU included) that the CJEU's doctrine «must not be read in a way that would view it as an apparent ultra vires act or as if it endangered the
protection and enforcement of the fundamental rights in the Member
States» (Judgment of the First Senate of 24 April 2013 — 1 BvR 1215/07 — para. 91).
These frameworks attempt to circumvent national
constitutional or human rights
protections governing interferences with the right to privacy of communications that,
States purport, apply only to nationals or those within their territorial jurisdiction.
The majority opinion of Justice Stewart was specifically approved by a unanimous Supreme Court of Canada in Hunter v Southam Inc., [1984] 2 SCR 145 where Justice Brian Dickson held, at p. 159, that s. 8 of the Charter containing the
constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure is not restricted to the
protection of property or associated with the law of trespass, at p. 159: «[I] n Katz... Stewart J. delivering the majority opinion of the United
States Supreme Court declared at p. 351 that «the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places».
Essentially, the national court asks whether Simmenthal II applies to the ECHR now that article 6 (3) TEU
states that «Fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States, shall constitute general principles of the Union's law&r
states that «Fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the European Convention for the
Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and as they result from the
constitutional traditions common to the Member
States, shall constitute general principles of the Union's law&r
States, shall constitute general principles of the Union's law».
«
Protection of reputation should be declared a stand - alone constitutional right under section 7 of the Charter, subject to the same vicissitudes as freedom of expression, namely, the further removed from its core value, the less worthy of protection,» states Timothy Danson, lead counsel for the doctor, in written submissions filed with the Court
Protection of reputation should be declared a stand - alone
constitutional right under section 7 of the Charter, subject to the same vicissitudes as freedom of expression, namely, the further removed from its core value, the less worthy of
protection,» states Timothy Danson, lead counsel for the doctor, in written submissions filed with the Court
protection,»
states Timothy Danson, lead counsel for the doctor, in written submissions filed with the Court of Appeal.
In addition, he
states that «a concept demanding
protection for a fundamental right must not be confused with an attack on the national identity or, more specifically the national
constitutional identity of a Member
State.»
Legal challenges involve aspects of
state constitutional law — separation of powers, due process, equal
protection and, prominently of late, the right to trial by jury.
This the Court achieved by claiming that the principle of effective judicial
protection constitutes a «a general principle of EU law stemming from the
constitutional traditions common to the Member
States», enshrined in Articles 6 and 13 of the ECHR and «reaffirmed» by Article 47 of the Charter (para. 35).
The
constitutional protection afforded people in the United
States for freedom of association is
protection from interference by the government and its agents.
The personal property must be exempt (1) under Florida Statute 732.402 or (2) constitutionally exempt from creditor's claims under
state constitutional provisions (i.e., homestead
protections).
Giving providers assurance that guidelines can be used only in their favor may be an important step toward gaining their support; but allowing such one - sided use of evidence in a court of law raises disturbing questions of fairness and of validity under the U.S. Constitution's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments» due process and equal
protection mandates, and under
state constitutional principles as well.
The Court of Justice reached this decision, which was highly controversial, after conducting a review of the scope of the
protection afforded to communications with in - house counsel across the member
states of the EU, and finding there not to be a sufficiently broad consensus on this point to justify the extension of the privilege, given that it was identified as being one of the fundamental principles of law common to the
constitutional traditions of the member
states.
'' [A] s the manifest purpose of the
constitutional provisions, both of the
states and of the United States, is to prohibit the compelling of testimony of a self - incriminating kind from a party or a witness, the liberal construction which must be placed upon constitutional provisions for the protection of personal rights would seem to require that the constitutional guaranties, however differently worded, should have as far as possible the same interpretation...&
states and of the United
States, is to prohibit the compelling of testimony of a self - incriminating kind from a party or a witness, the liberal construction which must be placed upon constitutional provisions for the protection of personal rights would seem to require that the constitutional guaranties, however differently worded, should have as far as possible the same interpretation...&
States, is to prohibit the compelling of testimony of a self - incriminating kind from a party or a witness, the liberal construction which must be placed upon
constitutional provisions for the
protection of personal rights would seem to require that the
constitutional guaranties, however differently worded, should have as far as possible the same interpretation...»