The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Justice, a nonpartisan law and policy institute, has monitored judicial elections and other
state court issues for almost two decades and published an extensive report last year about merit selection.
MARCH: A New York
state court issues a temporary injunction against the penalty after the state is sued by a group of parents.
Not exact matches
State court rulings are all over the map on this
issue and policy makers are still trying to find the right balance between company and personal rights.
The notice, which calls on local authorities to «create and refine platforms for exposing defaulted borrowers» by the end of the year, was jointly
issued by China's Supreme People's
Court, the Chinese Communist Party's Publicity Department and the China Banking Regulatory Commission, according to the
state - run Xinhua News Agency.
As the Supreme
Court gets ready in June to rule on the
issue for the second time in two years, conservative
states have rushed to enact so - called Religious Freedom Reformation Act (RFRA) laws that would allow businesses to object on religious grounds to serving LGBT people and same - sex couples.
And on top of those 70 lawsuits, there are actions in
state courts and at least one legal
issue abroad.
Same sex marriage is now legal in 36
states, and the Supreme
Court will
issue a final ruling on whether such couples have a federal right to marry in June.
Court of Appeals Judge Eugene Pigott
issued a separate opinion in the cases, concurring with the results but saying the
state's definition of parenthood should properly be set by the legislature.
In an August 10, 2009 hearing before Judge Rakoff in a case involving alleged disclosure
issues at Bank of America (bac), Rakoff responded to the SEC's evasiveness by
stating: «You are not going to be particularly effective with this
court by telling me what I already know, namely, that you filed a rather uninformative bare bones complaint.»
Eighteen
states issued statements supporting the Clean Power Plan the day after the Supreme
Court's stay.
While the California investigators who may have found the Golden
State Killer concluded that their novel approach was legal,
courts have barely begun to explore these
issues.
Patent trolls are more common in the United
States because they are able to exploit structural
issues within the patent and
court systems.
At
issue in the case is whether SLUSA divests
state courts of jurisdiction over class actions asserting claims arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (e.g., claims alleging a material misstatement in a registration statement).
Zillow Group accepts civil subpoenas for user data
issued by King County Superior
Court and the federal
courts in Washington
state.
As the accused allegedly acquired more than $ 5 million of the $ 6 million under scrutiny from within the
state of Massachusetts, it was Judge Rya Zobel of the District
Court of Massachusetts who
issued a freeze of their assets on January 16, 2018.
On May 2, 2012, a federal indictment was
issued for Meza - Flores in the United
States District
Court for the District of Columbia after he was charged with Conspiracy to Distribute Five Kilograms or More of Cocaine, Fifty Grams or More of Methamphetamine, One Kilogram or More of Heroin, and One Thousand Kilograms or More of Marijuana for Importation into the United
States; and Use of a Firearm.
The class action, filed in United
States District
Court, Southern District of New York, and docketed under 17 - cv - 09903, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Qudian's American Depositary Receipts («ADRs») pursuant and / or traceable to Qudian's false and misleading Registration Statement and Prospectus,
issued in connection with the Company's initial public offering on or about October 18, 2017 (the «IPO» or the «Offering»), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants» violations of the Securities Act of 1933 (the «Securities Act»).
According to Reuters, Judge Kimba Wood
issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the Alibabacoin Foundation, and ordered the defendants (including ABBC Foundation's CEO Jason Daniel Paul Phillip and CTO Hassan Abbas) to explain to the
court «why an order should not be
issued granting a preliminary injunction,» which would prohibit the defendants» usage of the Alibaba trademarks anywhere in the United
States.
The Supreme
Court declines to resolve
issue of whether
state hospitals can be sued for false insurance claims.
Investing in an American company like Uber, however, could run counter to Saudi Arabia's threat to sell off investments in the United
States,
issued during discussion about a bill in Congress that would allow the kingdom to be held responsible in American
courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
a valid
court order of protection issued by a New York State Court and / or a statement that disclosure of claim - related information could endanger the person seeking confidentia
court order of protection
issued by a New York
State Court and / or a statement that disclosure of claim - related information could endanger the person seeking confidentia
Court and / or a statement that disclosure of claim - related information could endanger the person seeking confidentiality.
I believe it was Citizens United for the Separtion of Church and
State that sought a
court injunction against
issuing explicitly Christian license plates there, but they managed to finagle a way around it.
After March 4, 2013, an International Arrest Warrant will be
issued against these Defendants.The guilty verdict followed nearly a month of deliberations by more than thirty sworn Citizen Jurors of the 150 case exhibits produced by
Court Prosecutors, The
Court's judgement declares the wealth and property of the churches responsible for the Canadian genocide to be forfeited and placed under public ownership, as reparations for the families of the more than 50,000 children who died in the residential schools.To enforce its sentence, the
Court has empowered citizens in Canada, the United
States, England, Italy and a dozen other nations to act as its legal agents armed with warrants, and peacefully occupy and seize properties of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada, which are the main agents in the deaths of these children
The statement suggested two legal remedies: first, the Supreme
Court could reverse Roe, returning the
issue to the
states; second, the nation could pass a constitutional amendment that would extend Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due process protection to unborn persons.
For me to accuse the
courts of being
state - centered on religion
issues, the reader might argue, smacks of sophistry.
Suggestions of ways to accommodate him, such as an internal referral system, were dismissed by the
court, which
stated that his employer was «entitled to treat the
issue as one of principle, in which compromise is inappropriate.»
You fundamentalist Christians continue to perpetuate this lie but the Supreme
Court has ruled on this
issue numerous times and the U.S. does have separation of church and
state.
The reason, no doubt, is that the
Court is a «vital national seminar» in ways and on
issues that churches never have been in the United
States.103
Sarawak
state's Islamic religious authorities did not object to
issuing the letter releasing him from his faith, but the registration department had insisted on a letter of release and order from the Shari`ah
Court.
Washington (CNN)-- As the Supreme
Court considers two major same - sex marriage cases that could change marriage in the United
States, religious leaders on both sides of the debate believe they are on God's side of the contentious
issue.
Washington (CNN)- Few
issues divide the Supreme
Court - and the country at large - more than church -
state matters, and arguments before the Supreme
Court on Wednesday involving a workplace discrimination lawsuit against a Lutheran church proved especially touchy.
This month, First Presbyterian asked the Sooner
State's top
court to take a third look at the case, arguing that the justices mixed up two separate
issues of law: the ecclesiastical extension / church autonomy doctrine and the ministerial exception.
• In Alabama,
state Supreme
Court chief justice Roy Moore said that officials are not «required» to
issue licenses for 25 days.
A federal judge in Oklahoma has
issued an order putting on hold the certification of a ballot measure that forbids
state courts from considering or using international laws, as well as Sharia, or Islamic law.
After several
state - level disputes involving florists, photographers, and bakers, America's highest
court will finally rule on the
issue.
Two centuries of judicial interpretation of the United
States Constitution have demonstrated that when the Supreme
Court veers off course in a particular case or series of cases, continued constitutional litigation over the
issue involved serves to correct their heading.
Ever since the Kentucky Supreme
Court issued an injunction against Medi - Share in 2011, the Christians - only healthcare ministry has continued to operate in the Bluegrass
State.
When confronted with federal constitutional arguments by the
State based on the Smith decision, the Minnesota
court deftly sidestepped the
issue.
In developing his notion of «curricular neutrality,» Nord takes on
issues of linguistics and philosophy, but his main concern is the constitutional law produced by the Supreme
Court's decisions on church and
state.
The act
states that «the Supreme
Court and all
courts established by Act of Congress may
issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.»
It is my hope, moreover, that this argument may be reflected in a continuing shift away from the strict separationist ideal that has for so long guided (and often misguided) Supreme
Court rulings on church -
state issues.
The Agrarian Prosecutor for the
Court of the Brazilian
state of Piauí has
issued an order for the cancellation of 124,400 ha of lands illegally acquired by businessman Euclides De Carli.
On April 27, 2015, Chief Judge Christina Reiss of the U.S. District
Court for the District of Vermont
issued an opinion that mostly favored the
State of Vermont and the positions of GMO - labeling advocates.
The principal builder of my new house (ex husband / tenant if you remember) defends
court claim
stating that his negligent and defective workmanship was the result of my mental health
issues.
Four
states — Hawaii, Maine, Michigan and Utah — require
courts to consider breast - feeding
issues in child custody cases.
A recent
issue this year in Utah has the
state's Supreme
Court challenged by intended parents who were denied the chance at having a child via surrogacy last year.
The Department for Work and Pensions has
issued an «urgent bulletin'today announcing that the Secretary of
State has decided to drop his pursuit of an appeal at the Supreme
Court on a case he had lost at the
Court of Appeal.
Texas v. White brought up that
issue for Texas, the the
Court found that a
State may not unilaterally secede.
At
issue is a wrinkle in the
state's judicial pay commission, which increased pay for judges last year, with the base pay for a Supreme
Court justice growing to $ 193,000 in 2016 and $ 203,000 in 2018.
Since the Supreme
Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United
States under the Constitution — the
Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United
States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United
States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives
issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme
Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».