Sentences with phrase «state electoral college»

Despite losing the indirect but all - important state - by - state electoral college count, «I won three million more (popular) votes than the other guy,» she said.

C - SPAN also provides free resources for teachers, such as a giant electoral college map that shows each states electoral college votes, and DVDs, including a recent series on the White House.

Not exact matches

That's because the states that happen to be swing states, meaning they are crucial to an electoral - college victory, also happen to be places where there is a high concentration of manufacturing employment, like Ohio, Michigan, Iowa, and New Hampshire.

Second, the electoral college got stuck in to provide a last line of defense against public stupidity — in case you didn't know it, the electors aren't legally bound to vote as their state's majority has.

Those familiar with the geographics of the US electoral college will immediately recognize that there is a high correlation between the steel producers and the «swing states» which most often determine the outcome of the American elections.

Brandon Watson explains why the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact --- in which states assign their votes in the electoral college to whoever wins the most votes countrywide --- is sheer madhattery:

It leaves some ends loose (for example, on state nullification of federal laws) and undertreats some areas of current interest (for example, the electoral college).

In the 2012 presidential campaign, while other pundits predicted a Romney victory, he forecast a large Obama margin in the electoral college, ultimately missing just two states.

One of the simplest means of dealing with this even retains the electoral college: have the EC allocate its votes for each state proportionately to the vote, regardless of electoral district (which also renders gerrymandering almost irrelevant, since the state is considered as a whole).

For state D, with its 4 votes in the electoral college, there are two ways of deciding the coalitions that will not see it win:

If the question is «does the electoral college advantages a state or an other, over the long run», then it is not really relevant that right now, some states are surely in one party's column and only a few are swing states.

Let's suppose a smaller country, with 4 states, conveniently named A, B, C, and D, having 1, 2, 3, and 4 votes in that country's electoral college each respectively.

The Electoral College is the body of 538 delegates representing the electoral points each State has.

Second, the electoral college was set up to weed out «unacceptable» candidates not by dividing fringe voters in different states per se but by giving the electors the power to elect the candidate who lost the popular vote in the event that the more popular candidate turned out to be unacceptable for whatever reason.

Although his book centres upon the UK, Goodhart explains that it can also account for the victory of President Trump: Trump consolidated the somewhere vote in key electoral college states.

In addition, under the electoral college a third party can tip the balance in a closely contested state by siphoning a few votes from a major - party candidate.

The US Presidential election uses an «electoral college» system, where each state gets a certain number of «electors» (votes), and those electors cast the official votes for President.

There are only two systems in the United States to allocate electoral college electors, and both involve voters picking only one candidate pair (President / Vice-President).

According to its supporters, one of the primary virtues of the electoral college is that winning candidates must obtainconcurrent majorities from around the country to win, rather than appeal to clusters of voters whose votes could be aggregated across states and regions but nevertheless might not represent all strata of society.

That is, let's say that there was a constitutional amendment in place that, instead of abolishing the electoral college, required that the votes be split in each state (somewhat like ME and NE but simpler.)

Under the electoral college it makes no sense for candidates to allocate scarce resources to states they either can not win or are certain to win, in which case, the size of their victory is irrelevant.

By contrast, the unit rule (by which states award all their electoral votes to the plurality winner in the state) that 48 states employ under the electoral college encourages third parties, especially regional candidates like Strom Thurmond in 1948 or George Wallace in 1968.

The electoral college distorts the political process by providing an incentive to visit competitive states, especially large competitive states.

This means that States are constitutionally mandated to follow Article II, Section 1, Clause 3 (which defines the electoral college) and the 12th amendment (which amends the electoral college's voting process).

Some states have moved to a more proportional allocation of their electoral college votes.

Having seized power through the electoral college used to elect the President of the United States, Donald Trump now intends to redeploy federal power away from civilian to military expenditures, to dismantle health care and other forms of income support, and to advance a neoliberal environment fostering business activity and investment.

At the extreme end, Congress might refuse to certify an electoral college result, so only the other state votes would count.

They elect their states representative in the electoral college which then elects both positions separately on the behalf of their voters.

In the presidential election of 1876, an Electoral Commission was appointed which chose between electoral college results offered by some disputed states.

Former President Bill Clinton, left, and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo vote in the state's electoral college at the Senate chamber in Albany on Dec. 19, 2016.

If you go the tied electoral college route, you might as well have a lot more political parties all winning different states.

Having seen the answers it doesn't look like CA is a specially interesting case of «how many people would need to move to make one state control the electoral college?»

In the extreme case, assuming a constant turnout across all 50 states (and with the electoral votes distributed as in 2011) *, it could take only 22 % of the popular vote to win the electoral college.

Therefore, a candidate could win a single electoral college vote by winning one district in either state.

He points out that, currently, the American constitutional system discriminates against residents of populous states, both in the U.S. Senate, and also in the electoral college.

Times Union staff photo by Lori Van Buren — Students from Shenendehowa try to stay awake during the electoral college in the NY State Senate Chamber at the Capitol in Albany, NY on December13, 2004.

The electoral college, of course, exists because of concerns for the influence of less - populous states.

For example, he won majorities of states, counties, and electoral college votes.

One example where this was particularly obvious was the 2016 Presidential election, where one candidate won one large state by such a massive margin, and lost many smaller states by slivers of margins, that one single state by itself caused the electoral college result to differ from the popular vote (the state was California - if add up the remaining 49 states and DC, the other candidate comfortably won the popular vote as well as the electoral college).

This is a form of proportional representation applied to the electoral college: It splits each state's electoral votes in accordance with their popular vote percentages.

If they don't send the electoral college votes on that day, then Congress isn't required to accept the electoral votes from that state.

To make one addition point, once the combined session of the United States Congress meets on Jan. 6th, and accepts or possibly objects to electoral college voters or how ever else the President and Vice President vote are counted, it's done.

Since the electoral college had already voted for the winner and the President had already inaugurated, what would happen since the Constitution doesn't state anything (as far as I recall)?

It also has the electoral college votes per state, but it removes faithless electors for other candidates.

--RRB- The winner - takes - all - electors in a state system is also a means by which smaller states gain disproportionate representation and it also helps create a mandate for the President by giving the winner a big majority in the electoral college.

It is possible to win one to nothing in enough states that the candidates gets at least 270 electoral college votes, which is enough to win.

State - by - state winner - take - all laws to award electoral college votes were eventually enacted by 48 states AFTER the Founding Fathers wrote the ConstituState - by - state winner - take - all laws to award electoral college votes were eventually enacted by 48 states AFTER the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitustate winner - take - all laws to award electoral college votes were eventually enacted by 48 states AFTER the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution.

On Monday after presiding over the state's electoral college vote, Cuomo brushed off a question as to whether he'd run in 2020.

You might prefer to get the electoral college numbers for the whole states.

The web page is also posting copies of each state's electoral college vote, as the states submit them.