Sentences with phrase «state products liability litigation»
«Discussion of federal and state products liability litigation.»
http://www.abajournal.com/ Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward - looking statements include, without limitation, possible product defects and product liability, risks related to international sales and potential foreign currency exchange fluctuations, the initiation or outcome of litigation, acts or potential acts of terrorism, international conflicts, significant fluctuations of quarterly operating results, changes in Canadian and foreign laws and regulations, continued acceptance of RIM's products, increased levels of competition, technological changes and the successful development of new products, dependence on third - party networks to provide services, dependence on intellectual property rights, and other risks and factors detailed from time to time in RIM's periodic reports filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and other regulatory authorities.
Related Categories: 9th Circuit Court States Consumer Law Product Liability Law Trials & Litigation Injury & Accident Law Legislation & Lobbying Tort Law California Partner Verdicts & Settlements
To date, Tom has been lead counsel in over 100 jury trials in both Federal and State Court encompassing a wide variety of injuries and wrongful death resulting from product liability, premises liability, vehicular, trucking accidents, and bad faith litigation.
Professional Associations Monroe County Bar Association, Member New York State Bar Association, Chairman: Torts, Insurance, and Compensation Law Section (2003 - 2004) NYSBA Automobile Liability Committee Chairman (1991 - 1995) NYSBA House of Delegates, Delegate (1999 - 2004) New York State Trial Lawyers Association Risk and Insurance Management Society (2007 - present) Council on Litigation Management (2008 - present); Chairman, Products Liability Conference (2010 - 2013) New York Editorial Board, Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company (1993 - 1995) Defense Research Institute (2000 - present) The National Fire Protection Association, Member The American Society for Metals, Member
His practice covers a range of litigation, including commercial, class action defense, product liability, mass tort, environmental, trade secret, insurance coverage, and real property title disputes in state and federal courts.
Professional Admissions: State of New Jersey State of New York United States Supreme Court United States District Court for the District of New Jersey United States District Court for the Southern District of New York United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Professional Activities: Appointee, District V - A Ethics Committee (Newark / Essex) Appointee, Consumer Protection Law Committee of the New Jersey State Bar Association Appointee, Business and Commercial Litigation Committee of the New Jersey State Bar Association Appointee, Franchise Law Committee of the New Jersey State Bar Association Appointee, Hudson County Civil Practice Committee Barrister, Hudson American Inn of Court Member, New Jersey Association for Justice Member, American Bar Association Member, New Jersey State Bar Association (Civil Trial Bar, Products Liability and Mass Torts, and Business and Commercial Law Sections) Member, New York Bar Association Member, Hudson County Bar Association Member, Hackensack Regional Chamber of Commerce
In a complex products liability action involving alleged PCB contamination of a state office building, the Appellate Practice Group joined forces with litigation counsel to convert a $ 60 million judgment to a defense verdict for a large, multinational company.
Our Product Liability Litigation trial lawyers have handled thousands of liability and major tort cases throughout the United States and abroad for clients from a broad spectrum of industries, iLiability Litigation trial lawyers have handled thousands of liability and major tort cases throughout the United States and abroad for clients from a broad spectrum of industries, iliability and major tort cases throughout the United States and abroad for clients from a broad spectrum of industries, including:
He is a skilled and successful litigator with over twenty five years» experience in handling complex litigation including personal injury, product liability, insurance coverage, land use, commercial, construction disputes in state and federal court.
During his 21 - year legal career, Mr. Goldberg has litigated hundreds of cases in federal and state courts throughout the United States involving claims of retaliation, discrimination, wrongful termination, fraud, defamation, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract, as well as commercial contract disputes, civil RICO, ERISA, trade secrets and restrictive covenants, corporate governance disputes, minority shareholder disputes, partnership disputes, Madoff counseling and defense, advancement and indemnification proceedings, whistleblower actions (SOX and CEPA), executive compensation counseling, litigation, and arbitration, international litigation and arbitration, antitrust litigation and arbitration, products liability litigation, environmental and toxic tort litigation, and securities fraud.
John G. Browning is the managing partner of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, L.L.P., in Dallas, where he handles civil litigation in state and federal courts in areas ranging from employment and intellectual property to commercial cases and defense of products liability, professional liability, media law, and general negligence matters.
His environmental and tort litigation experience includes dozens of products liability actions in California State and Federal District Courts and multi-district litigation proceedings in the Southern District of New York that arise out of MTBE contamination of drinking water aquifers, as well as actions brought under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act («CERCLA»), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act («RCRA»), California Proposition 65, the Clean Air Act, and various state and federal criminal laws, environmental laws, or tort dliability actions in California State and Federal District Courts and multi-district litigation proceedings in the Southern District of New York that arise out of MTBE contamination of drinking water aquifers, as well as actions brought under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act («CERCLA»), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act («RCRA»), California Proposition 65, the Clean Air Act, and various state and federal criminal laws, environmental laws, or tort doctrState and Federal District Courts and multi-district litigation proceedings in the Southern District of New York that arise out of MTBE contamination of drinking water aquifers, as well as actions brought under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act («CERCLA»), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act («RCRA»), California Proposition 65, the Clean Air Act, and various state and federal criminal laws, environmental laws, or tort dLiability Act («CERCLA»), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act («RCRA»), California Proposition 65, the Clean Air Act, and various state and federal criminal laws, environmental laws, or tort doctrstate and federal criminal laws, environmental laws, or tort doctrines.
Mr. Cacace has represented clients in a wide range of matters in state and federal trial and appellate courts, including business litigation, intellectual property disputes, product liability actions, consumer class actions, and real estate disputes.
Areas of Practice Litigation & Appeals Medical Malpractice Motor Vehicle Accidents — Plaintiff Personal Injury — Plaintiff Products Liability Law State Appellate Practice White Collar Crimes Workers» Compensation Law Motor Vehicle Defects Premises Liability Wrongful Death
Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Wyeth v. Levine that FDA approval does not preempt state tort liability for drug makers, state court decisions like this one will be an important battle ground in pharmaceutical companies» product liability litigation.
He represents corporations and individuals in highly complex civil litigation in both the federal and state courts as well as administrative tribunals in many areas including business torts, corporate and employment law, product and professional liability, and defamation.
Chinese Drywall DUI Criminal Domestic Violence Drug Crimes State Criminal Defense Federal Criminal Defense Personal Injury Defective Products Overview Crime Victims Class Actions Consumer Protection Pharmaceutical Liability Toxic Torts Medical Malpractice Nursing Home Neglect Workers Compensation Social Security Disability Veteran's Benefits Qui Tam Tax Investigations Business Litigation Wills and Estates Professional License Defense Traumatic Brain Injury Employment Accidents (Train / Truck / Car)
He focuses his practice on construction, business, commercial, product liability, employment discrimination and premises liability litigation in state and federal courts and before state administrative bodies.
Drawing on attorneys from across practice areas and offices, Weil has developed an impressive track record advising with respect to shareholder claims and demands for litigation, internal whistleblower complaints, class and collective actions brought by employees relating to pay, worker classification, and discrimination claims, product liability issues and recalls, privacy rights, intellectual property disputes (patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets), regulatory investigations commenced by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of Justice, and state attorneys general, and major disputes with suppliers and competitors.
Chinese Drywall DUI Criminal Domestic Violence Drug Crimes State Criminal Defense Federal Criminal Defense Personal Injury Defective Products Overview Crime Victims Class Actions Consumer Protection Pharmaceutical Liability Toxic Torts Medical Malpractice Nursing Home Neglect Workers Compensation Social Security Disability Veteran's Benefits Qui Tam Predatory Lending Tax Investigations Business Litigation Wills and Estates Professional License Defense Traumatic Brain Injury Employment Accidents (Train / Truck / Car)
Related Categories: 5th Circuit Court States Admiralty & Maritime Law Alternative Dispute Resolution Insurance Law Product Liability Law Trials & Litigation Environmental Law Corporate Law Injury & Accident Law Legislation & Lobbying Tort Law Louisiana Solo / Small Firm Verdicts & Settlements Oil Spill
Related Categories: 9th Circuit Court States Consumer Law Insurance Law Product Liability Law Trials & Litigation Injury & Accident Law Legal Information Medical Malpractice Tort Law Idaho Solo / Small Firm Disability Law
Related Categories: States Product Liability Law Trials & Litigation Injury & Accident Law Medical Malpractice Legislation & Lobbying Tort Law Law Professor John Marshall Law School Verdicts & Settlements
Keesal, Young & Logan attorneys have experience in every stage of products liability litigation from the initial, pre-litigation accident investigation through pretrial discovery, trial and appeal in state and federal courts.
Since 2001, Mr. Cannella has focused on litigation pertaining to toxic torts, product liability, serious personal injury, and wrongful death, successfully handling multi-million dollar cases and numerous jury and bench trials, both in state and federal court.
He defends numerous corporate and commercial clients in state and federal courts involving commercial litigation and casualty defense litigation, including catastrophic trucking accidents, construction accidents, products liability, environmental matters and premises liability.
As stated in Judge Edmon's order John Gomez, among other attorneys and their law firms have been recognized as, «having considerable experience in complex litigation» and «extraordinary knowledge in the field of products liability».
In Re: ACTOS (Pioglitazone) Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2299 (United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana):
In re: Vioxx ® Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1657 (United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana).
Raised primarily in the State of Maine, Annabelle Steinhacker is admitted in both the New Jersey and New York Bars and concentrates her practice in the litigation of personal injury matters involving automobile negligence, products liability, construction site negligence and the representation of persons charged with motor vehicle and criminal violations.
Our Dallas and Houston defective drug lawyers represents clients in product liability litigation throughout the United States, and we employ an expansive bank of resources to develop solid strategies that our clients may rely upon.
Frost has nearly three decades of handling state and federal trials for IP, products liability, and other complex commercial litigation, while Johnson holds a double Ph.D. in organic chemistry and mechanical engineering and is well versed in Texas patent litigation matters.
Gary D. White, Jr.'s practice is dedicated to the representation of individuals in tort litigation across the State of Kansas in the areas of automobile negligence, medical malpractice, product liability, wrongful death, federal tort claims, third - party claims against insurance companies, and all other areas of injury litigation.
Our skilled attorneys represent individuals, businesses, and municipal and county governments throughout the state in cases of auto accidents, slip - and - fall accidents, personal injury, estate litigation, brain injury, wrongful death, workers» compensation, Social Security Disability, civil litigation, product liability, wills, trusts, estates, business law, taxation and government matters.
Admitted to the Nevada State Bar in 1982, Mr. Spann has extensive experience in all aspects of litigation, with a focus in the areas of product liability, complex civil litigation, trucking law and insurance litigation.
Written by John A. Day, Civil Trial Specialist, 2012 Best Lawyers Bet - the - Company Litigation Lawyer of the Year for Nashville and 2012 Best Lawyers in America listed in Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice, Products Liability, Commercial and Bet - the - Company Litigation, Day on Torts identifies more than 300 Tennessee tort law subjects and provides summary of the leading case on each subject to give you a quick, readable synopsis of current state of the law.
He advises large national corporations on complex litigation in the areas of product liability defense, mass tort defense, class action and multidistrict litigation, as well as regional companies and locally owned concerns, in court cases in both state and federal systems.
From 1976 to 1989, Bill was an attorney with the Public Citizen Litigation Group, where he litigated law reform cases on state and federal constitutional law, antitrust and administrative law, voting rights, product liability, nuclear power, and food and drug law, and where he argued dozens of appellate cases, including several in the U.S. Supreme Court.
She regularly handles environmental, toxic tort, food and product liability litigation in federal and state courts; routinely advises on environmental and food regulatory issues; and has substantial experience handling regulatory aspects of major transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, public / private partnership ventures and renewable energy deals.
Since founding the firm, Mr. Palmer has dedicated his practice to the representation of individuals in tort litigation across the State of Kansas in the areas of medical malpractice, product liability, automobile negligence, wrongful death, electrical injuries, federal tort claims, third - party claims against insurance companies, and all other areas of injury litigation.
Top talent at the firm includes distinguished trial lawyer Michael Lehman, who heads the firm's medical malpractice and physician advocacy group and is considered a top expert in the state in high - stakes medical malpractice cases, pharmaceutical and medical device product liability claims and litigation related to the aviation industry.
In February 2018 the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) established MDL No. 2809, IN RE: ONGLYZA (SAXAGLIPTIN) AND KOMBIGLYZE XR (SAXAGLIPTIN AND METFORMIN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LLitigation (JPML) established MDL No. 2809, IN RE: ONGLYZA (SAXAGLIPTIN) AND KOMBIGLYZE XR (SAXAGLIPTIN AND METFORMIN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATIONLITIGATION.
Defended aircraft manufacturer in product liability litigation in state and federal courts arising from fatal crashes in general aviation.
Carlton Fields has represented major manufacturing companies in product liability litigation in state and federal courts nationwide for more than 30 years.
After more than 20 years with our firm, partner and litigation lawyer Roberto Martínez has successfully handled high - profile product liability, white collar criminal defense and business litigation cases at the federal, state and international levels.
Mr. Sneath has extensive federal and state court trial experience in cases involving commercial disputes, intellectual property matters, construction claims, professional negligence lawsuits, products liability and pharmaceutical litigation, insurance coverage and insurance bad faith claims.
She has extensive experience representing clients in both federal and state courts on complex commercial and business - related litigation matters, including oppressed minority shareholder and intra-company disputes, shareholders» rights and derivative litigation, restrictive covenants, construction litigation, contracts, insurance coverage litigation, and products liability cases.
Legal Times: «Wednesday's decisive Supreme Court ruling against Wyeth in a landmark pharmaceutical product liability case may also close off a major front in a hard - fought battle by businesses and the Bush administration to insulate national corporations from state tort litigation.»
(1) extending negligent misrepresentation beyond «business transactions» to product liability, unprecedented in Texas; (2) ignoring multiple US Supreme Court decisions that express and implied preemption operate independently (as discussed here) to dismiss implied preemption with nothing more than a cite to the Medtronic v. Lohr express preemption decision; (3) inventing some sort of state - law tort to second - guess the defendant following one FDA marketing approach (§ 510k clearance) over another (pre-market approval), unprecedented anywhere; (4) holding that the learned intermediary rule does not apply whenever a defendant «compensates» or «incentivizes» physicians to use its products, absent any Texas state or appellate authority; (5) imposing strict liability on an entity not in the product's chain of sale, contrary to Texas statute (§ 82.001 (2)-RRB-; (6) creating a claim for «tortious interference» with the physician - patient relationship, again utterly unprecedented; (7) creating «vicarious» breach of fiduciary duty for engaging doctors to serve as expert witnesses in mass tort litigation also involving their patients, ditto; and (8) construing a consulting agreement with a physician as «commercial bribery» to avoid the Texas cap on punitive damages, jaw - droppingly unprecedented.