Instead of using coal,
the state runs on natural gas and increasingly, renewable power.
Not exact matches
Most electricity in the United
States is generated at power plants that
run on coal and
natural gas — fossil fuels that contribute significantly to global warming by emitting large amounts of carbon dioxide.
Choosing
natural gas to power our vehicles would send the United
States down the same expensive and inefficient path that created our addiction to foreign oil and our dependence
on a resource that will ultimately
run out.
The newest coal - fired generator in the
state, the enormous Unit 6 at the Rogers Energy Complex in Cliffside, is being converted to
run flexibly
on either coal or
gas, while coal - fired Unit 5 was excluded by the UCS analysis because it is being converted to
run partially
on natural gas, but would also fail the economic stress test compared to
natural gas and wind.
He collected data
on crude oil,
natural gas, coal, and cement production worldwide by three types of entities: investor - owned (e.g. ExxonMobil),
state - owned (e.g. Saudi Aramco) and government -
run entities (e.g. North Korea's coal industry).
Yes, it will be possible someday to
run an energy grid almost entirely
on wind and solar, using demand - shifting and energy storage for the role
natural gas (the dominant energy source in the
state) plays today.
With cheap
natural gas substituting coal for electricity production, a sustained downturn in coal demand in China, and tough new regulations
on greenhouse
gas emissions in the United
States, pure play coal companies like Peabody Energy (NYSE: BTU) and Arch Coal (NYSE: ACI), are having a horrible
run of it.
Federal and
state governments are already paying tens of thousands of dollars per vehicle to companies that convert trucks to
run on natural gas.