The bill also proposes two student count dates, but includes other changes to
state school funding statute.
Not exact matches
In 1968, however, that
State amended its educational finance
statute to permit counties to collect additional
funds locally and spend those amounts on its
schools.
As a reminder, plaintiffs included nine public
school students (backed by some serious corporate reformer
funds as per Students Matter) who challenged five California
state statutes that supported the
state's «ironclad [teacher] tenure system.»
Alabama also enacted tuition grant
state laws permitting students to use vouchers at private
schools in the mid-1950s, while also enacting nullification
statutes against court desegregation mandates and altering its teacher tenure laws to allow the firing of teachers who supported desegregation.50 Alabama's tuition grant laws would also come before the court, with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama declaring in Lee v. Macon County Board of Education vouchers to be «nothing more than a sham established for the purpose of financing with
state funds a white
school system.»
The
state has used equalized wealth levels for maintenance and operations
funding (not facilities
funding) for various tiers of
funding; however, as noted further below, there are several
statutes that contribute to the lingering inequities of the Texas
school finance system.)
The Kentucky Court of Appeals, which was then the
state's highest court, held that a
statute authorizing public aid to private
schools for exceptional children did not violate, among other Constitutional Provisions on Education, Kentucky's Blaine Amendment because the
funds were for children's «welfare» rather than «education.»
The
school funding law is based on what the Legislature has put into
state statutes before significant budget cuts that were made during the recent record drop in
state revenue.
Contrary to the plain language of the
statute, the new rules restricted how
states could measure «
school quality,» gauge «student success,» or steer improvement
funds to
schools.
Under
state statute, charter
school students are defined as students of the «
state» not the local
school district, yet we must redirect our limited resources to
fund charter
school costs.
Specifically, we ask that you hold firm to fully
fund: the charter per - pupil increases currently set in
statute: 10 new
state charter
schools; all 25 of the legally allowed commissioner's Network Schools; and the full statewide rollout of the educator evaluation program
schools; all 25 of the legally allowed commissioner's Network
Schools; and the full statewide rollout of the educator evaluation program
Schools; and the full statewide rollout of the educator evaluation program»
While there are budgetary priorities that need to be advocated for in Washington DC, there are many
states that lack complementary definitions in
state statute about
school libraries and librarians, as well as many
states and Local Education Agencies (LEA) that have not been in the habit of
funding programs or positions because there was no compelling reason in the law to do so.
By
statute,
states can not cut
funding to charter
schools, and even if they could, they don't save any money by doing so — the kids will still be in the public
school system.