Not exact matches
Decoupled the
state assessments from teacher
evaluations and placed a four - year moratorium on the use
of student test scores for
evaluation purposes;
«The basic
purpose of this commission, according to the governor's charge, was to «comprehensively review and assess New York
State's education system, including its structure, operation and processes...» In failing to deal at all with such major issues as funding, special education, the lack
of appropriate supports for English language learners, as well as ignoring major current controversies such as implementation
of [teacher
evaluations] and common core systems, the commission has ill - served students, parents, and the public at large.»
Principals or teachers who perform observations for the
purpose of the
state's teacher
evaluation system may count those hours toward the total.
Schools are using the exams to establish student growth for the
purpose of state - mandated teacher
evaluations, which are in their second year in most
of the
state and their first year in New York City.
Rosa, who has been outspoken on testing and teacher
evaluations issues, may clash with
state education commissioner MaryEllen Elia, who was hired under the leadership
of Tisch and supports high standards and
state testing for data
purposes.
For the 2002 - 2003 through the 2005 - 2006 school year test administrations, for
purposes of the commissioner's annual
evaluation of public schools, public school districts, and charter schools, the following limited English proficient students may be considered to be meeting performance criteria in elementary or middle - level English language arts if they demonstrate a specified increment
of progress on the New York
State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) for their grade level.
A commonly
stated purpose of teacher
evaluations is targeted professional development to improve teacher effectiveness; however, a presentation from Linda Darling - Hammond (2010), education policy expert and professor
of education at Stanford University, noted that well under half
of all teachers receive continuous professional development, mentoring or coaching or engage in peer observation as a result
of evaluation.
There are two preconditions: A
state must have an approved application for stabilization funds, and at the time
of applying, there must be not any legal, statutory, or regulatory barriers at the
state level to linking data on student achievement or student growth to teachers and principals for
purposes of evaluation.
The
purpose of the Oregon framework was developed to provide guidance for implementation
of state and federal requirements as districts develop or align their local
evaluation and support systems.
His critique is
of the 2013 - 2014 Growth Model for Educator
Evaluation Technical Report, produced by the American Institute for Research (AIR) that, «describes the models used to measure student growth for the purpose of educator evaluation in New York State for the 2013 - 2014 School Year&raqu
Evaluation Technical Report, produced by the American Institute for Research (AIR) that, «describes the models used to measure student growth for the
purpose of educator
evaluation in New York State for the 2013 - 2014 School Year&raqu
evaluation in New York
State for the 2013 - 2014 School Year» (p. 1).
The
purpose of this guide is to provide
states with strategies for developing universally designed assessments, including conceptualization and item construction; field testing; item reviews; statewide operation; and
evaluation.
The
purpose of CEELO's National RoundTAble is to provide early childhood specialists and their colleagues in
State Education Agencies with research and best practice to improve
states» knowledge about and use
of early childhood comprehensive assessment systems and teacher
evaluation in the early years
of the learning continuum.
CTAC is providing large - scale support to the New York
State Education Department to implement an integrated system
of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) and teacher observations for
purposes of teacher and principal
evaluation across all 714 school districts.
CEA leadership pressed the
state's Performance
Evaluation Advisory Council (PEAC) today to answer a fundamental question: What is the
purpose of the
state mastery test?
If adopted by the
State Board
of Education at its next meeting — April 5, 2017 — the Common Core Smarter Balanced Assessment (SBAC) test would still be used for a variety
of purposes but would play a much more limited role in the teacher
evaluation process.
As a teacher in a mid-Atlantic
state notes, «First, they should have introduced the new standards, then the new assessments, and only then used the standards and assessments for
purposes of evaluation.
(e) The board shall establish the information needed in an application for the approval
of a charter school; provided that the application shall include, but not be limited to, a description
of: (i) the mission,
purpose, innovation and specialized focus
of the proposed charter school; (ii) the innovative methods to be used in the charter school and how they differ from the district or districts from which the charter school is expected to enroll students; (iii) the organization
of the school by ages
of students or grades to be taught, an estimate
of the total enrollment
of the school and the district or districts from which the school will enroll students; (iv) the method for admission to the charter school; (v) the educational program, instructional methodology and services to be offered to students, including research on how the proposed program may improve the academic performance
of the subgroups listed in the recruitment and retention plan; (vi) the school's capacity to address the particular needs
of limited English - proficient students, if applicable, to learn English and learn content matter, including the employment
of staff that meets the criteria established by the department; (vii) how the school shall involve parents as partners in the education
of their children; (viii) the school governance and bylaws; (ix) a proposed arrangement or contract with an organization that shall manage or operate the school, including any proposed or agreed upon payments to such organization; (x) the financial plan for the operation
of the school; (xi) the provision
of school facilities and pupil transportation; (xii) the number and qualifications
of teachers and administrators to be employed; (xiii) procedures for
evaluation and professional development for teachers and administrators; (xiv) a statement
of equal educational opportunity which shall
state that charter schools shall be open to all students, on a space available basis, and shall not discriminate on the basis
of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, gender identity, ethnicity, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, age, ancestry, athletic performance, special need, proficiency in the English language or academic achievement; (xv) a student recruitment and retention plan, including deliberate, specific strategies the school will use to ensure the provision
of equal educational opportunity as
stated in clause (xiv) and to attract, enroll and retain a student population that, when compared to students in similar grades in schools from which the charter school is expected to enroll students, contains a comparable academic and demographic profile; and (xvi) plans for disseminating successes and innovations
of the charter school to other non-charter public schools.
Rather, I
stated (accurately) that «The Gates Foundation, for example, makes it clear that the foundation supports the use
of student test data for educator
evaluation even as it declares the need for a two - year moratorium, the
purpose of which is to allow teachers the time to adjust to the new Common Core Standards and related tests.»
Pay special attention to Section V, the Data Use section
of the grant proposal, requiring
states to collect and share early childhood data, match students and teachers for the
purpose of teacher
evaluation, and promote inter-operability across institutions, agencies, and
states.
«Observations used to condition the models ought to be explicitly
stated, or there is the risk
of doubly calling on data for
purposes of both calibration and
evaluation.»
By contrast, for the
purposes of showing that, before or at the same time as conferring the advantage, the Member
State took that decision as a shareholder, it is not enough to rely on economic
evaluations made after the advantage was conferred, on a retrospective finding that the investment made by the Member
State concerned was actually profitable, or on subsequent justifications
of the course
of action actually chosen -LRB-...).»
CRA agents proceeded to write to the restaurant,
stating that it had been selected for an «
evaluation»
of its electronic records, and that the
evaluation was «not an audit, but rather a limited review
of your current recordkeeping practices to determine if they are adequate for
purposes of the Income Tax Act and Excise Tax Act.»
(d) The provision
of State law requires a health plan to report, or to provide access to, information for the
purpose of management audits, financial audits, program monitoring and
evaluation, or the licensure or certification
of facilities or individuals.
«Certified Dermatology Medical Assistant (CDMA)» Dermatology On Demand, Inc., d / b / a Association
of Certified Dermatology Techs, located in Waynesville, North Carolina, has filed a petition with the United
States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for «Certified Dermatology Medical Assistant (CDMA)» in connection with «testing, analysis, and
evaluation of the knowledge, skills and abilities
of others for the
purpose of certification and re-certification in the field
of healthcare.»
In addition, various
states have adopted their own laws that pertain to the procurement and use
of outsourced reports used for employment
evaluation purposes (Consumer Reports).
Source: Georgetown University National Technical Assistance Center for Children's Mental Health and Johns Hopkins University Women's and Children's Health Policy Center and Portland
State University Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children's Mental Health The
purpose of this tool kit is to increase the capacity for high - quality
evaluation of early childhood mental health consultation (ECMHC) in community based settings.