Such questions demand that the original
statement be corrected if the answer to the question is negative.
For the sake of argument, though, we will assume that Zycher's latest
statements are correct and that these three policies will add $ 55.4 billion of additional GDP to the province each and every year.
«I want to make sure, when I make a statement that
the statement is correct.
In this case, the FT
statement is correct.
If
that statement is correct, you will never see truth for what it is.
If by dialogue one means that a settled question is, in fact, an open question and that the Magisterium's answer can be rejected without consequences for one's communion with the Church,
the statement is correct.
Credenza said that mishu's statement was «sheepdip,» when, in fact, mishu's
statement was correct fact.
if there are many shades how can
your statement be correct.»
Caryn and I have had many discussions about that situation and
my statements are correct.
Your first
statement is correct.
Certainly that is ONE way to interpret the current data, and I happen to think it is very likely that
your statement is correct (I am a «believer» in my own mind of this statement), but it is not an automatic a ssumption and there are several scientific and philosophical papers that describe viable mechanisms that would overturn that a ssumption.
The fact here is, you DO NOT KNOW with absolute certainty, that
your statements are correct.
If
this statement is correct, it would appear that the Sadducees accepted as scripture only the Pentateuch, not the prophets or the other writings.
Your statement is correct, but it might be more accurate that the relative hotness of a pepper pod depends on the relative amount of capsaicin by weight in each pod.
While that blanket
statement is correct I would be curious to know exactly which positions are least likely become pro bowlers relative to draft position (not sure I'm saying that right).
If the last
statement is correct, because of the fast elimination of cotinine in mice the level of exposure in the study was 3 times higher (2 ^ (60/37.5) ≈ 3) than the above - calculated values.
i hope someone will read this and derive some benefit from these words, i have studied this for 18 yrs and i have massive proof that
these statements are correct.
Students draw a smiley face if
the statement is correct or a sad face if the statement is gramatically incorrect.
This means that there is no way to know if
the statement is correct unless the author conducts an audit.
Both statements are correct.
Your best defense is to make sure that your reported income on your annual Social Security
statement is correct, and to review your credit report regularly for any new or unauthorized accounts.
If the above
statements are correct, then the DEBT MFs like ultra short term funds and short term funds which are for short term investments like 3 months — 1 year and suppose if I come in 30 % bracket, so will 30 % get deducted from my gains?If yes, will it be really profitable to invest?
Within 90 days of receiving your letter, we must either correct the error or explain why
the statement was correct.
Can you plz update which
statement is correct!!
They may advertise for example: «this product contains health promoting GI microflora» and in a different sentence state an «unhealthy gut microflora can cause equine colic» and
both statements are correct in and of themselves to some extent.
Make sure all the charges and payments listed on
the statement are correct.
With the exception of Bloodborne and Witcher 3,
his statement is correct.
One might imagine the IPCC being supremely confident that
their statement is correct (80,15,5).
Let's say
your statement is correct and that the half - life of CO2 in our climate system (including all your caveats) is 100 to 120 years, as shown in the presentation of Zeke Hausfather at the Yale Forum (this would be at the upper end of your estimate)..
So, from the Third Assessment Report onwards, the IPCC decided that authors should only make definitive and conclusive - sounding statements, but that they would accompany those statements with an estimate of how likely they felt it was that
the statement was correct.
This throws the spotlight back on the instrumental temperature record and whether the above
statement is correct.
Without proper references, there is no way to check whether Monckton's
statements are correct.
Ofcom's ruling said: «Neither
statement was correct, or sufficiently challenged during the interview or subsequently during the programme».
His claims can be challenged for reasons going beyond that label, or even beyond the funding (I personally wouldn't bother to find out about the funding if I knew
the statements were correct, or logical or defensible).
But if
you statement is correct, there is no justification for policies that will damage the world economy and probably deliver no benefit.
Even if
this statement is correct (which I doubt)- the biologically fixed carbon would need to be fixed permanently to truly offset fossil fuel emissions.
On the other hand, they do constitute a pretty small fraction of total GHG emissions, so
your statement is correct in the sense that «contribute to global warming» would be more accurate than «cause global warming.»
[12] Neither
statement is correct, as discussed below.
Most of
your statement is correct, however most police would refuse to carry out such a confiscation due to two reasons.
The officer's
statements were correct: a lawyer can not insist on being present when the police question an accused who has obtained counsel; and the cases discussed above do not support the proposition that if counsel were in attendance, he or she would be entitled to interject or interrupt during the interview or to override or «assist» with answers offered by the client.
This certainly makes sense, but it relies on your bolded
statement being correct.
@Jake:
Your statement is correct.
Performed mathematical operations to calculate if violation and billing
statements are correct and accurate.
Sales Associate B confirmed this and his belief that
the statement was correct.
But your last
statement is correct except for the word «reputation»; submit «public perception», and I will agree with you.
Not exact matches
These
statements are based on current estimates and assumptions made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors that we believe
are appropriate and reasonable under the circumstances, but there can
be no assurance that such estimates and assumptions will prove to
be correct.
Any forward - looking
statement speaks only as of the date on which such
statement is made and the Company undertakes no obligation to
correct or update any forward - looking
statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Instead of
correcting course to avoid further catastrophe, the Maduro regime
is attempting to circumvent sanctions through the Petro digital currency — a ploy that Venezuela's democratically - elected National Assembly has denounced and Treasury has cautioned U.S. persons to avoid,» Mnuchin said in a
statement.
«Over the past several months, Cambridge Analytica has
been the subject of numerous unfounded accusations and, despite the company's efforts to
correct the record, has
been vilified for activities that
are not only legal, but also widely accepted as a standard component of online advertising in both the political and commercial arenas,» the company said in the
statement.
While perhaps factually
correct, the
statement is completely tone deaf regarding the crisis — and, make no mistake, this
is a public relations crisis — because it ignores the customer.