Comment: Some commenters supported the proposal to require covered entities to provide notification of the covered entity's statement of denial and the individual's
statement of disagreement in any subsequent disclosures of the information to which the dispute relates.
(ii) If the individual has not submitted a written
statement of disagreement, the covered entity must include the individual's request for amendment and its denial, or an accurate summary of such information, with any subsequent disclosure of the protected health information only if the individual has requested such action in accordance with paragraph (d)(1)(iii) of this section.
Whenever such a rebuttal is prepared, the covered entity must provide a copy to the individual who submitted
the statement of disagreement.
(iii) A statement that, if the individual does not submit
a statement of disagreement, the individual may request that the covered entity provide the individual's request for amendment and the denial with any future disclosures of the protected health information that is the subject of the amendment; and
These commenters also recommended that the individual be notified of the covered entity's intention to rebut
a statement of disagreement.
The written denial must state that if the individual chooses not to file
a statement of disagreement, the individual may request that the covered entity include the individual's request for amendment and the covered entity's denial of the request with any future disclosures of the protected health information that is the subject of the requested amendment.
The covered entity may reasonably limit the length of
a statement of disagreement.
The covered entity may prepare a written rebuttal to the individual's
statement of disagreement.
The covered entity may reasonably limit the length of
a statement of disagreement and may prepare a written rebuttal to the individual's statement of disagreement.
Covered entities would have been permitted to establish a limit to the length of the individual's
statement of disagreement and to summarize the statement if necessary.
If the individual submits a written
statement of disagreement, all of the appended or linked information, or an accurate summary of it, must be included with any subsequent disclosure of the protected health information to which the disagreement relates.
(i) If
a statement of disagreement has been submitted by the individual, the covered entity must include the material appended in accordance with paragraph (d)(4) of this section, or, at the election of the covered entity, an accurate summary of any such information, with any subsequent disclosure of the protected health information to which the disagreement relates.
The covered entity must, as appropriate, identify the record or protected health information in the designated record set that is the subject of the disputed amendment and append or otherwise link the individual's request for an amendment, the covered entity's denial of the request, the individual's
statement of disagreement, if any, and the covered entity's rebuttal, if any, to the designated record set.
As appropriate, a covered entity must identify the protected health information in the designated record set that is the subject of the disputed amendment and append or otherwise link the individual's request for an amendment, the covered entity's denial of the request, the individual's
statement of disagreement, if any, and the covered entity's rebuttal, if any, to the designated record set.
If the individual does not submit a written
statement of disagreement, the covered entity must include the appended or linked information only if the individual requests that the covered entity do so.
I can't find one that has issued
a statement of disagreement.
We agree that some of the standard transactions can not currently accommodate additional material such as
statements of disagreement and rebuttals to such statements.
Not exact matches
You can also use specifically to give feedback, challenge ambiguous
statements, and drill down into the cause
of a
disagreement.
Jones said it would be difficult to say whether a student who signed OneWheaton's
statement would be in open
disagreement with the covenant, though he is not aware
of any student who has left or been dismissed over involvement with the group.
This is not a grudging
statement of «toleration» but a declaration — a theologically argued declaration —
of the moral imperative
of respect for diversity and
disagreement.
The hospital explained in a
statement that it is common for cases to be referred to the courts when there are
disagreements about what course
of action is within the patient's «best interest.»
Of course, there were disagreements, but the statements, adopted overwhelmingly, are: «Married Life and the Gift of Love», «Ministry to Persons with a Homosexual Inclination» and «Happy Are Those Who Are Called to His Supper»
Of course, there were
disagreements, but the
statements, adopted overwhelmingly, are: «Married Life and the Gift
of Love», «Ministry to Persons with a Homosexual Inclination» and «Happy Are Those Who Are Called to His Supper»
of Love», «Ministry to Persons with a Homosexual Inclination» and «Happy Are Those Who Are Called to His Supper».
By mid-May, 36
of approximately 100 faculty members had resigned; at least 25 more cited
disagreement with the pledge or faith
statement.
These are
statements that people would use when they would rather not do the hard work
of delving into a significant issue or
disagreement.
Hmm... one
of the problems I see with doctrinal
statements — and the underlying need for them — is that they often are the result
of disagreements over interpretation.
Since the early church had no set «canon
of Scripture» (we'll deal with this later), no universally accepted doctrinal
statements or creeds, no seminaries to teach «correct doctrine», and no Pope or Denominational leaders to decide between disagreeing factions, there was a lot
of disagreement in the early church about what was truth and what was «heresy.»
He said himself in his
statement that he left due to a
disagreement of ambitions between himself and the board, which by now seems completely possible.
In creating these
statements relating to maternity care and birth place in the United States, we acknowledge the complexity inherent in each topic
of concern, as well as some
disagreement about how to best achieve or demonstrate these principles.
«WGRZ has admitted it is blatantly excluding a ballot - status candidate from a debate because
of a personal
disagreement between a station employee, Scott Levin, and Mr. Murphy,» the
statement alleged.
In a joint
statement a copy
of which was made available to the Nigeria Politics Online, Saraki and Dogara said there is no
disagreement over their dispositions to the amendment.
When I asked for his view on the letter Donovan replied with a suggestion
of disagreement, saying «I think our government has to get on the same page» and «I think sometimes politics gets in the way
of governing», but did not offer any clear
statement on the letter.
In a
statement signed and sent to DAILY POST by his aide, Garba Shehu, Buhari said assignment will involve «resolving
disagreements among party members, party leadership and political office holders in some states
of the Federation.»
The Interpersonal Reactivity Index, a well - known questionnaire, taps empathy by asking whether responders agree to
statements such as «I often have tender, concerned feelings for people less fortunate than me» and «I try to look at everybody's side
of a
disagreement before I make a decision.»
To measure tolerance we included four
statements on the survey to which students could express their level
of agreement or
disagreement: 1) People who disagree with my point
of view bother me; 2) Artists whose work is critical
of America should not be allowed to have their work shown in art museums; 3) I appreciate hearing views different from my own; and 4) I think people can have different opinions about the same thing.
To measure historical empathy, we included three
statements on the survey with which students could express their level
of agreement or
disagreement: 1) I have a good understanding
of how early Americans thought and felt; 2) I can imagine what life was like for people 100 years ago; and 3) When looking at a painting that shows people, I try to imagine what those people are thinking.
Tolerance was also measured with
statements to which students could express agreement or
disagreement, ranging from «People who disagree with my point
of view bother me,» to «I think people can have different opinions about the same thing.»
The key points from each strand are highlighted as follows: Early Identification and support • Early identification
of need: health and development review at 2/2.5 years • Support in early years from health professionals: greater capacity from health visiting services • Accessible and high quality early years provision: DfE and DfH joint policy
statement on the early years; tickell review
of EYFS; free entitlement
of 15 hours for disadvantaged two year olds • A new approach to statutory assessment: education, health and care plan to replace
statement • A more efficient statutory assessment process: DoH to improve the provision and timeliness
of health advice; to reduce time limit for current statutory assessment process to 20 weeks Giving parent's control • Supporting families through the system: a continuation
of early support resources • Clearer information for parents: local authorities to set out a local offer
of support; slim down requirements on schools to publish SEN information • Giving parents more control over support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice
of school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve
disagreements: use
of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the Tribunal
The Education Department, noting its
disagreement with a
statement of Congressional intent, says it will not require states to earmark extra Chapter 2 block - grant money for «high cost» pupils.
Most self - report affective inventories ask respondents to indicate agreement or
disagreement with a series
of statements related to the affective dimensions being measured.
We conducted descriptive statistical analysis by calculating the means
of the closed - answer and Likert - style questions to determine trends in agreement,
disagreement, or neutrality toward survey
statements.
Perhaps if you could provide the substance
of your
disagreement — as opposed to merely the
statement thereof — we could engage in a fruitful debate.
Your
disagreement with the
statement in that report is with a wider community than just the authors
of the Klotzbach et al 2009 paper.
On person attributed the violence
of the
disagreement in climate science to the propensity
of scientific societies to publish position
statements, and the IPCC itself; these create animosity and hostility through the exercise
of power without sufficient accountability.
On person attributed the violence
of the
disagreement in climate science to the propensity
of scientific societies to publish position
statements
For this purpose, we instructed them to indicate their level
of agreement or
disagreement with
statements such as «the scientists who did the study were biased,» «computer models like those relied on in the study are not a reliable basis for predicting the impact
of CO2 on the climate,» and «more studies must be done before policymakers rely on the findings»
of the study etc..
You are asked to suggest 5 reviewers, and any reviewers that you don't want (you need to provide a reason; simple
disagreement won't work; not i can legitimately claim that Mann shouldn't review my papers because
of public
statements he has made about me)
Across these three groups
of statements, there is very little
disagreement on much other than on the environment.
(In some
of these
statements, the scoring was reversed, so that 1 = agreement, 4 =
disagreement, denoted by «R».)
Anyone have any
disagreements with my
statement that the Steig paper showed approximately 30 years
of cooling since the quick warming??
Two members
of the ad hoc committee have issued separate
statements to express their
disagreement with this proposed change.