They do not give us so much in the way of personal inspiration — not even much positive
statement of the faith which, Jude says, «was once for all delivered to the saints.»
Not exact matches
«Confidence» was the theme
of Poloz's opening
statement before the House
of Commons Finance Committee,
which identified a need to restore the
faith of Canadians in pursuing business opportunities following the shake - up
of the global financial crisis.
The First Vatican Council included language like (the Pope) «is the true vicar
of Christ and head
of the whole Church and
faith, and teacher
of all Christians; and that to him was handed down in blessed Peter, by our Lord Jesus Christ, full power to...» This transfer
of power depends on the Roman Church's understanding
of the Office
of the Keys
which I do not agree with, but their
statements make it clear that the Pope's authority as the Roman Church understands it is derived from Christ's.
If you ask a conservative for a
statement of his political convictions, he may well say that he has none, and that it is the greatest heresy
of modernity is precisely to see politics as a matter
of conviction: as though one could recuperate, at the level
of political purpose, the consoling certainty
which once was granted by religious
faith.
Evangelii gaudium,
which followed a 2012 Synod
of Bishops meeting on «The New Evangelization for the Transmission
of the Christian
Faith,» has long been seen as a sweeping
statement of Francis's agenda.
It seems to me, as I wrote, that confessing the Church's
faith as explicitly one's own increases both the drama
of the
statement and the investment with
which one makes it» and that such submission to the whole Church's creed offers a symbolic movement away from, not toward, individualism.
It would be strange if, after all the recent discussion as to how much Christianity is a «historical
faith,» Christian theologians would adopt an understanding
of theological language
which ruled out all historical
statements.
Like The Gift
of Salvation
statement issued by Evangelicals and Catholics Together in 1997, the Joint Declaration represents a measure
of convergence between Catholic and Reformational understandings
of that article
of faith by
which the Church either stands or falls, to quote a favorite Lutheran saying.
Colin... Very nice «
statement of faith» (back on page 98) unless you personally did all the «objective research» yourself,
which, in part, you would have had to trust in one or two «man - made» instruments for your so called «objective» testing.
Those who still cling to pre-scientific religious fictions, ignoring the truths discovered through modern science, should at least take notice when the biology department at the world's most prominent Baptist university, where a
statement of faith is a prerequisite for teaching, unequivocally support evolution through the following
statement,
which you can look up on their web site:
A disembodied Word expressed in creedal
statements,
which were constructed to defend orthodoxy against heresy rather than proclaim the
faith, will not communicate the joy and redemptive power
of the gospel.
The German - American thinker Paul Tillich, who died only a few years ago, believed that the Christian
faith could only be rightly understood when it was recognized as providing the «answer» — not
of course in words or propositions but in the reality
which is behind such
statements — to the «problems»
which are posed by human existence as such.
(See W. Jaeger's
statement in his Theology
of the Early Greek Philosophers, p. 177: «The concept
of auctoritas
which is later to be
of such decisive importance for the attitude
of the Church in questions
of faith, is entirely missing in Greek thought»).
«Our purpose is not to denigrate any religion or
faith,
which would be repugnant to our educational purposes,» the Harvard student group had said in a
statement, «but instead to learn and experience the history
of different cultural practices.»
Rev Dr Jeremiah M Gado, president
of the Evangelical Church Winning All (ECWA), to
which Leah and her parents belong, issued a
statement saluting her «courage, doggedness and
faith» and condemning «in strong terms any attempt to forcefully convert anyone from one religion to another.»
If such a teaching on
faith or morals appears to anyone to conflict with earlier teachings, the problem is not with the truth
of the Council's
statement but with our understanding
of the Church's full teaching
of which the Council's
statement is inescapably a part.
In that
statement we together affirmed the way in
which we understand justification by
faith alone as a gift received by God's grace alone because
of Christ alone.
His
statement that the brain is just a computer is quite frankly, a great leap
of faith in
which there is absolutely no evidence.
«Without question, Day
of Truth is a loving and redemptive way students
of faith can express their views positively in response to GLSEN's Day
of Silence
which only presents one point
of view,» Candi Cushman, education analyst for Focus on the Family, said in a
statement.
Imperfect as the
statement of the man
of faith may be, the reality about
which his
statement is made remains entirely independent
of that imperfection.
From the packed and intense inwardness
of that
statement,
which locates the dynamics
of the
faith - full life
of the Christian within the enacted morphology
of the Incarnation and resurrection he passes, after sundry personal and admonitory asides, to the blithe and humane: «Finally, brethren, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely...
These considerations add up to the judgment that while it is possible to make undialectical single
statements about general idealism, for instance, it is quite another and a more imaginative task to expose the inner core
of faith which looks like and works like idealism but is compounded
of utterly different stuff.
I would say that this book is more
of a thesis on
faith,
which can easily be disproven, than a firm
statement on what
faith is (and is not).
The
Faith and Order
statement then went on to point out how every social order is limited by the «continuing sinfulness
of man»
which are meant to protect human beings in society.
«To carry on with the life
which I have chosen and
which I love» — as an apology for a confession
of faith, such a
statement reduces religious belief to a form
of therapy.
The
faith which arises in encounter with the self - revealing God feels the need to formulate true
statements of faith both within the community
of those who share this experience and also for outsiders.
He asks us to believe that the U.S. bishops issued a
statement called «Political Responsibility» during a U.S. election year that merely rediscovers nineteenth - century German social thought,
which by chance offers a political platform that, by sheer coincidence, parallels the U.S. Democratic platform program by program, yet these very bishops are completely immune from influence by the current political constellation in their headquarters» host city
of Washington, D.C. Further, this very professor tells us that the problem with Republicans» the party
of Ford, Bush, and Dole» is that they are excessively committed to the «unfettered free market» and lack «
faith in the government's ability to provide» social benefits, a position he claims is completely contrary to the Catholic
faith.
Finally, the nonmythological core is constituted by the
statement of the justification
of faith which appears consequently as the Gospel in the Gospel.
In the Athanasian Creed, that ancient canticle
of Christian
faith still found in the service books
of many Christian communions, there is a fine
statement which gives the proper setting for any discussion
of Christian worship and, a fortiori, for a discussion
of the central act
of Christian worship, the sacrament
of the Lord's Supper, the Eucharist, the Holy Communion, the Divine Mysteries, the Liturgy, the Mass — call it what you will.
Is the question no longer raised, is the question still under the sway
of an objectifying thinking,
which looks for the security
of the Was in «general
statements» and puts off surrendering to the insecurity
of the Dass,
of the decision
of faith?
Three
of the high - water marks
of 20th - century ecumenism reflect this dominance: the WCC's New Delhi
statement on «the unity we seek» (1961), Vatican II's Unitatis redintegratio (Decree on Ecumenism, 1964) and the WCC's
Faith and Order document Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry,
which, though not given its finishing touches until just before its publication in 1982, reflects in its substance agreements that had been reached a decade or more earlier.
Berkouwer rightly sees that the challenge
of the nouvelle théologie was taken up by John XXIII in his opening address to the Second Vatican Council in a much - discussed
statement: «The deposit or the truths
of faith, contained in our sacred teaching, are one thing, while the mode in
which they are enunciated, keeping the same meaning and the same judgment, is another.»
To be sure, they argue their views in the Hope way,
which is to say in a middle way: they want neither a
statement of faith for all faculty to sign (like Wheaton) nor a Protestants - only hiring policy (like Calvin).
Cobb (1982b p. 21) draws attention to a
statement from a World Council
of Churches consultation on dialogue with people
of living
faiths in 1971
which said «Dialogue thus involves the risk
of one partner being changed by the other.
Now I wish to make three
statements which seem to me to be plainly true, either from a serious acceptance
of the conceptuality
which I have been assuming or from the deliverances
of the Christian
faith itself.
I mean, their belief system is generally based on
faith that there is no god, even though there is no proof for an absolute materialist universe,
which is as much a
statement of faith as a religious persons» Note I am agnostic and find both extremes goofy.
The USCCB website invites us a little coyly to «Dive in deep into the Church's teachings»: this can be done by going to one
of the site's most valuable pages,
which gives links to
statements on marriage by the United States Conference
of Catholic Bishops, the Catechism
of the Catholic Church, the Second Vatican Council, Pope Benedict XVI, Pope John Paul II, the Congregation for the Doctrine
of the
Faith, the Pontifical Council for the Family and the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace.
In a
statement, the bishops said: «We are deeply honoured that Pope Francis will come to our country to participate in this universal church celebration
of faith and joy, as well as
of the contemporary challenges
which face families.
Your belief in «evidence, logic and reason» is itself an act
of faith which leads you to accept some
statements and reject others.
Melancthon always realised that Luther's rumbustious concern with the dynamic
of faith, with preaching the Gospel, with a lived and announced theology must arouse opposition, and gladly as he accepted Luther's sincerity and indeed the importance
of a Gospel enunciated without compromise, yet he considered it was necessary also to have a conceptual summary
of what was believed,
which could enable the different viewpoints to come together in what we call today Agreed
Statements.
By theology in the broadest sense I mean any coherent
statement about matters
of ultimate concern that recognizes that the perspective by
which it is governed is received from a community
of faith.
«We believe there is nothing in Dr. Hawkins» public
statements that goes against the belief in the power and nature
of God, Christ, or the Holy Spirit that the Statement
of Faith deems as a necessary requirement for affiliation with Wheaton College,» states the letter,
which also praised Hawkins, the only African American woman with tenure on the Wheaton faculty.
' [I] n today's world, subject to so many rapid changes and shaken by questions
of deep relevance for the life
of faith, in order to govern the barque
of Saint Peter and proclaim the Gospel, both strength
of mind and body are necessary, strength
which in the last few months has deteriorated in me to the extent that I have had to recognize my incapacity to adequately fulfill the ministry entrusted to me,» he continued in his
statement.
The
statement read in part, «The killing
of any Nigerian in circumstance such as this is bad enough, but the killing
of two reverend fathers in one fell swoop inside a church during Mass is most sacrilegious, provocative, a deliberate assault on the Christian
Faith and an open invitation to a religious war from
which we pray merciful God to deliver Nigeria.
According to Concordia's mission
statement, the school is committed to providing a challenging, supportive, and
faith - based learning environment,
which emphasizes justice, compassion, and moral integrity; and while the school maintains a Christian focus, students
of any background are welcome, and diversity is encouraged.
The information on this website is presented in good
faith and on the basis that the Saint Lucia Tourist Board, nor their agents or employees, are liable (whether by reason
of error, omission, negligence, lack
of care or otherwise) to any person for any damage or loss whatsoever
which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking (as the case may be) action in respect
of any
statement, information or advice given in this website.
The information on this website is presented in good
faith and on the basis that Best On Travel Network, Inc., nor their agents or employees, are liable (whether by reason
of error, omission, negligence, lack
of care or otherwise) to any person for any damage or loss whatsoever
which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking (as the case may be) action in respect
of any
statement, information or advice given in this website.
(a) an electronic or physical signature
of the person authorized to act on your behalf; (b) a description
of the material that has been removed or to
which access has been disabled and where the material was located online before it was removed or access to it was disabled; (c) a written
statement by you that under penalty
of perjury, that you have a good
faith belief that the material was removed or disabled as a result
of mistake or misidentification
of the material to be removed or disabled; and (d) your address, telephone number, and email address; and (e) a
statement that you consent to the jurisdiction
of federal district court for the judicial district in
which the address is located, or if your address is outside
of the United States, for any judicial district in
which the service provider may be found, and that you will accept service
of process from the person who provided notification under DMCA 512 subsection (c)(1)(c) or an agent
of such person.
He summed up his attitude in the 1965
statement «
Faith, Hope, and Impossibility,» in
which he describes his studio situation in terms that sound like they were taken right out
of Being and Nothingness: «You begin to feel as you go on working that unless painting proves its right to exist by being critical and self - judging, it has no reason to exist at all - or is not even possible.»
I don't think we should be scared
of admitting that we just don't know, if indeed we just don't know (
which I believe is a fair reflection
of the state
of the science)... I do not believe that Fu et al. weightings is some panacea nor that the «cancellation» works on all space and timescales (the
statement needs to be * proved * it can not be accepted as an article
of faith — that is not the way science works).