Sentences with phrase «states flexibility yet»

That's why, assuming that Congress fails to act to reauthorize the law, in the end the same problem that has vexed the law since 2001 seems likely to plague the waiver process as it grinds on over time: how to give states flexibility yet ensure that they hold schools accountable for results.

Not exact matches

Yet Congress leaves it to the states to define what those mean, and Duncan acknowledged that the added flexibility offers «both the greatest opportunity and the greatest risk.»

Providing teachers with the flexibility to move between states would allow teachers to go where they can be most successful, stimulating improvement within states that do not yet compensate or support teachers well and helping to curtail the issue of teacher shortages.

Yet the state legislature is prepared to enact a bill that would virtually ensure that the state loses out on $ 40 million dollars through Race to the Top, and a much - needed ESEA waiver that would bring flexibility for state spending of $ 350 million in federal dollars on behalf of students statewide.

And yet just the other day, Governor Malloy, Commissioner Pryor and the Connecticut State Board of Education were talking about changes and flexibility associated with Connecticut's absurd teacher evaluation system, but there was virtually no mention that the federal waiver Malloy, Pryor and the state requested and received puts severe limitations on just how much «flexibility» Connecticut has in some of these aState Board of Education were talking about changes and flexibility associated with Connecticut's absurd teacher evaluation system, but there was virtually no mention that the federal waiver Malloy, Pryor and the state requested and received puts severe limitations on just how much «flexibility» Connecticut has in some of these astate requested and received puts severe limitations on just how much «flexibility» Connecticut has in some of these areas.

Our issue is — and there's a lot of detail yet that we haven't gone through — will the state be given the flexibility, and will it be an orderly transition?»

[FN29] Yet, this very concern inculpates a joint custody presumption: if flexibility to the point of being completely amorphous * 775 is necessary to make the presumption palatable, why state the concept as firmly as the District of Columbia has done?