I'm
stating verifiable facts.
Not exact matches
The urgency of supporting the Four Cardinals arises from the objectively
verifiable fact that the Church is in a
state of complete confusion over some very fundamental issues.
I am open to seeing sourcing on the subject and think it would be interesting, but spouting off a single man's opinion is not
verifiable fact when others have
stated against such truths.
you have
stated an opinion but no
facts... where are the
verifiable miracles?
This is not our opinion, it's a 100 %
verifiable fact if you read through the terms and conditions of the site where they
state that they «generate and respond to communications using automated programs that try to simulate your communication with another human being so none really exists and any dialogue is generated by computer programming.»
Not only do I fully agree with MarkCoker's post below, I would like very much to know where the author of this article got his information, because to present statements like the ones made in this article, a person should have some
verifiable proof of the
facts stated.