Sentences with phrase «station network yield»

comparing the 42 ‐ rural station data used in the 1990 GRL and Nature papers with those adjusted for homogeneity of a 728 ‐ station network yield very much the same results, implying that the station moves, if any, really did not matter when a representative set of stations (here 42 ‐ stations) was used.

Not exact matches

United States Seismic Array — A network of seismic stations, including portable ones that will be moved across the entire United States over a 10 - year period, will map subtle differences in the seismic energy traveling through our planet, yielding an improved understanding of deep - earth structures.

(3) See NRC 2012 CTBT Report Finding 4 - 6: «With the inclusion of regional monitoring, improved understanding of backgrounds, and proper calibration of stations, an evasive tester in Asia, Europe, North Africa or North America would need to restrict device yield to levels below 1 kiloton (even if the explosion were fully decoupled) to ensure no more than a 10 percent probability of detection for IMS and open monitoring networks», and associated text.

From the paper: «The results also 1) reveal a significant level of coupling between ocean and land temperatures that remains even after the effects of ENSO and volcanic eruptions have been removed; 2) serve to highlight the improvements in the quality of the time series of global - mean land temperatures with the increase in the areal coverage of the station network from 1951 onward; and 3) yield a residual time series in which the signature of anthropogenically induced global warming is more prominent.»