These indices are also calculated from weather
station observations recorded at 22 locations within southwestern British Columbia, Canada, to evaluate the performance of both the 10 - km and 800 - m datasets in replicating the observed quantities.
Not exact matches
Some of the discontinuities (which can be of either sign) in weather
records can be detected using jump point analyses (for instance in the new version of the NOAA product), others can be adjusted using known information (such as biases introduced because changes in the time of
observations or moving a
station).
These sources included: (1)
records of gray whale catches off the Korean coast between 1948 and 1966), (2) an
observation of four gray whales in the western Okhotsk Sea in 1967 and (3) a sighting of a mother - Remote research
station used since 1995 to conduct research on gray whales feeding off Sakhalin Island seen in the background, while a gray whale feeds near shore in the foreground.
The lab supplies our students with resources that are normally available only from a major publisher, including 10 group testing
stations, a living room style lab with an
observation booth for real - world evaluations, and real - time high definition
recording and broadcasting equipment.
Some of the discontinuities (which can be of either sign) in weather
records can be detected using jump point analyses (for instance in the new version of the NOAA product), others can be adjusted using known information (such as biases introduced because changes in the time of
observations or moving a
station).
Has anyone any experience with this: 27.5.7
Records of the Division of
Station Facilities and Meteorological
Observations and its predecessors
Steve, unfortunately for this
station the raw data ends in 1984, so it's a bit hard to say much about a difference in slope between raw and adjusted data from 1970 - 1984 (I would have to do a significance testing to see if you even have enough data
records for any slope to be significant for only 15 years of
observations).
It seems to me that with thousands of
station changes and millions of
observations that changes resulting in warmer
recordings would be offset by a more or less equal number of changes resulting in cooler
recordings.
Because the GISS analysis combines available sea surface temperature
records with meteorological
station measurements, we test alternative choices for the ocean data, showing that global temperature change is sensitive to estimated temperature change in polar regions where
observations are limited.
The period of increased warming from 1987 to 1997 loosely coincided with the divergence of the global average temperature anomalies over land, which are derived from
observation station recordings, and the global average anomalies in sea surface temperatures.
The Bureau of Meteorology's Monthly Weather Review is based on
observations from all available years of data at all WA
stations with a temperature
record longer than 30 years.
The median trends for all the sites range from 0.98 °C per century for sites with more than two months of
observations and to 0.97 °C per century for
stations with
record lengths greater than 30 years.
This discontinuity of
observation location, if the
records are correct, are fairly typical of the surfaces
stations I have visited or looked up.
The USHCN TOB adjustments are made month by month, and
station by
station, and seem quite plausible if the
records of times of
observation are correct.
As the trend in the US rural
stations, which at least until very recently employed these min / max
stations, has been from early evening
observation (5 pm or 7 pm in most of the sources I've found) to early morning
observation (usually 7 am), this has been presumed to put an artificial cooling bias into the temperature
record, so a net positive, and increasing as more
stations have been converted, correction has been added to the raw data.
See, the first thing to do is do determine what the temperature trend during the recent thermometer period (1850 — 2011) actually is, and what patterns or trends represent «data» in those trends (what the earth's temperature / climate really was during this period), and what represents random «noise» (day - to - day, year - to - random changes in the «weather» that do NOT represent «climate change»), and what represents experimental error in the plots (UHI increases in the temperatures, thermometer loss and loss of USSR data, «metadata» «M» (minus)
records getting skipped that inflate winter temperatures, differences in sea
records from different measuring techniques, sea
records vice land
records, extrapolated land
records over hundreds of km, surface temperature errors from lousy
stations and lousy maintenance of surface
records and
stations, false and malicious time - of -
observation bias changes in the information.)
Anomalies provide a useful way of salvaging temperature
records corrupted by problems of
station loss, relocation, changing
observation times etc. etc..
Second, orbital instrumental
observations provide only a recent
record of land surface area temperature assessment, and the methods involved had to be calibrated against the prevailing standards of proximal thermometric determination, the widely - ranged system of meteorological thermometers in these United States providing (as others here have observed) a sort of «gold standard» in terms of technology, maintenance, and reliability as compared with similar broadly spaced systems of monitoring
stations.
Surface
observations made at weather
stations and onboard ships, dating back over a century, provide the longest available
records of cloud cover changes.
The catalogue includes current details of each weather
station and a history of
observations at the location, including
record length and relevant metadata.
Global temperatures are adjusted to account for the effects of
station moves, instrument changes, time of
observation (TOBs) changes, and other factors (referred to as inhomogenities) that cause localized non-climatic biases in the instrumental
record.
There is a cooling bias of about 0.5 C introduced to the conterminous U.S. temperature
record from CRN data by shifting
observation times from 5 PM to 7 AM in 50 percent of
stations.
Unfortunately, we are stuck with the historical temperature
record, where there are only a handful of
stations in the world that have remained at the exact same location with the exact same instrument and
observation time with no major changes to micro - or meso - scale environments over the last 100 + years.
MMTS (at least the ones used by co-op
stations) do not
record hourly temperatures and provide a daily min / max value that needs to be reset at the
observation time just like old LiG min / max thermometers.