Not exact matches
In order to separate student characteristics from aspects of segregated public schools, Kainz used a statistical technique called «propensity score matching,» which allows for comparison of reading growth in segregated and non-segregated schools, while also accounting for numerous differences in the students» background
In order to separate
student characteristics from aspects of segregated public schools, Kainz used a
statistical technique called «propensity score matching,» which allows for comparison of reading growth
in segregated and non-segregated schools, while also accounting for numerous differences in the students» background
in segregated and non-segregated schools, while also accounting for numerous
differences in the students» background
in the
students» backgrounds.
In addition, statistical techniques can control for the influence of differences in the background of students in each group or in the additional resources provided to each grou
In addition,
statistical techniques can control for the influence of
differences in the background of students in each group or in the additional resources provided to each grou
in the background of
students in each group or in the additional resources provided to each grou
in each group or
in the additional resources provided to each grou
in the additional resources provided to each group.
Despite
differences in statistical approach and
in the selection of
students to be included
in the analysis, Barnard's findings are largely consistent with those we reported.
The most important characteristic included among our
statistical controls is 8th - grade test score, which aims to capture
differences in student ability and
students» educational experiences prior to high school.
Students in magnet public schools have slightly higher scores than assigned public school students, although the difference does not approach statistical signi
Students in magnet public schools have slightly higher scores than assigned public school
students, although the difference does not approach statistical signi
students, although the
difference does not approach
statistical significance.
Sophisticated
statistical programs can help administrators draw vital inferences about the learning process, especially about the extent to which each teacher is providing «value - added» to
students (after allowing for
differences in student backgrounds and other influences on learning that teachers can't control).
These characteristics were used
in statistical models to adjust for whatever
differences remained between
students who were offered and not offered vouchers.
The researchers also point out there were 1290 unique school and grade combinations
in the study sample — an average of 40
students per combination — which meant it «lacked
statistical power to find significant
differences between treatment conditions or grade levels».
In the elementary grades 3 through 5,
students of new Teach for America teachers gained an average of 5.8 percent of a standard deviation more on the TAAS reading exam than did
students with other new teachers, a
difference that fell just short of
statistical significance (see Figure 2).
Finally, while the motivation of the entire study was to investigate the role and effect of different state policies, the only policies RAND's researchers actually built into their main
statistical models were
differences in per - pupil spending,
student - teacher ratios, and other resource variables.
This is
in part because there are many other influences on
student gains other than individual teachers, and
in part because teachers» value - added ratings are affected by
differences in the
students who are assigned to them, even when
statistical models try to control for
student demographic variables.
However, given the
statistical controls employed and the consistency of their findings with other studies at different grade levels, one can conclude that the question as to whether effective teachers make a significant
difference in student achievement has been answered.
From deploying AI to avoid paying parking tickets
in the UK to using law
students as a paralegal resource to the harnessing of natural language processing and
statistical probability to recognise textual
differences, all the innovations
in this report confront and shake up the status quo.
This non-parametric
statistical hypothesis test can be considered as an alternative to the paired
Student's t - test and can be used to compare repeated measures on a single sample to assess
differences in the population mean ranks.