Not exact matches
Expert
Prediction from Eric Fox, vice president of
statistical and economic
modeling (VeroForecast)-- The top forecast markets shows price appreciation in the 10 % to 11 % range.
By tweaking orbital parameters and running their
model repeatedly, the team could make some
statistical predictions about the car's future path.
The
model predictions are therefore reliable, taking some
statistical uncertainty into account.
Although a more detailed understanding of the physics of the two layers is necessary to improve the computer
models, the stratospheric effects can simply be used as another factor to incorporate into
statistical predictions.
These
statistical fluctuations produce the background noise that makes it so difficult for mathematical
models to provide clear
predictions with respect to individual iterations of such probabilistic processes.
We are excited to connect and compare planet formation
models and their
predictions to exoplanet populations; we are looking for a postdoctoral researcher with expertise in planet formation, exoplanet population studies, and / or
statistical assessment of exoplanet surveys,
«Integrating multi-scale phenotypic information into
prediction models for genotype by environment interaction by a synthesis of
statistical - genetic and physiological
models»
Since the 1950s, social scientists have been comparing the predictive abilities of traditional experts, and what are known as «
statistical prediction rules,» which are just simple
models.
Further, decision makers who, when provided with the output of the simple
statistical model, wave off the
model's
predictions tend to make poorer decisions than the
model.
These
statistical models are very efficient at encapsulating existing information concisely and as long as things don't change much, they can provide reasonable
predictions of future behaviour.
PIOMAS has been run in a forward mode (and hence without data assimilation) to yield seasonal
predictions for the sea ice outlook (Zhang et al. 2008) and has also provided input to
statistical forecasts (Lindsay et al. 2008) and fully - coupled
models.
Prediction methods for the sea ice minima range from ad - hoc guesses to
model predictions, from
statistical analyses to water - cooler speculation in the blogosphere.
-- in which case, that's a
statistical model prediction, which, at least in this context, we shouldn't rely on — if we actually know some things about how the climate works then it makes more sense to use that knowledge.
(As an aside, we wonder how Gray, who is largely known for
prediction of hurricane behavior based on (
statistical)
modeling, felt about this?).
Based on this, I suggest that the best way to monitor trends would be to use a
statistical correlation
model (such as the above) and check if new data points fall within 2 standard deviations of the
model predictions.
Yuan et al. (LDEO Columbia University), 5.08 (+ / - 0.51),
Statistical The prediction is made by statistical models, which are capable to predict Arctic sea ice concentrations at grid points 3 - month in advance with reasona
Statistical The
prediction is made by
statistical models, which are capable to predict Arctic sea ice concentrations at grid points 3 - month in advance with reasona
statistical models, which are capable to predict Arctic sea ice concentrations at grid points 3 - month in advance with reasonable skills.
Canadian Ice Service, 4.7 (+ / - 0.2), Heuristic /
Statistical (same as June) The 2015 forecast was derived by considering a combination of methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end - of - winter Arctic ice thickness extents, as well as winter Surface Air Temperature, Sea Level Pressure and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) a simple statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice
Statistical (same as June) The 2015 forecast was derived by considering a combination of methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end - of - winter Arctic ice thickness extents, as well as winter Surface Air Temperature, Sea Level Pressure and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) a simple
statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice
statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based
Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR)
prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predictors.
As a researcher in a non-climate area I am stunned at (a) the lack of replication, (b) the tortured and frequently questionable use of certain
statistical methods, © the overall underspecification of
statistical models given the signifcance of the
predictions being made and (d) the unwillingness of researchers to essentially treat anyone outside their immediate field with common courtesy.
The June, July, and August SIO reports received a total of 106 contributions for pan-Arctic extent
predictions (based on multiple methods:
statistical, dynamical
models, estimates based on trends, and subjective information) along with contributions for Alaska regional extent
predictions, descriptive regional contributions, and pan-Antarctic extent
predictions — a new SIO feature for 2017.
As a logician and supporter of the IPCC's conclusions regarding AGW, how do you respond to the absence, in AR4, of reference to the
statistical population underlying the IPCC's conclusions or of
predictions from the IPCC's
models.
Although the heatwave
prediction for India is based on a
statistical model, the
model itself is based on half a century of carefully - measured temperature, heatwave and heat - related mortality data.
The
statistical assessment of errors in
model prediction and
model estimation is of fundamental importance.
For any
statistical forecasting
model, a large number of observations are necessary to get reliable
predictions.
Cohen received his Ph.D. in Atmospheric Sciences from Columbia University in 1994 and has since focused on conducting numerical experiments with global climate
models and advanced
statistical techniques to better understand climate variability and to improve climate
prediction.
Type 3
statistical downscaling uses the regression relationships developed for Type 1
statistical downscaling, except using the variables from the global
model prediction forced by specified real - world surface boundary conditions.
Under a logical approach to validation, each
prediction that is made by a predictive
model is viewed as making a claim about the outcome of a
statistical event and this claim is viewed as a logical proposition.
Dynamic and
statistical downscaling is widely used to refine
predictions from global climate
models to smaller spatial scales.
Canadian Ice Service; 5.0;
Statistical As with Canadian Ice Service (CIS) contributions in June 2009 and June 2010, the 2011 forecast was derived using a combination of three methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end - of - winter Arctic Multi-Year Ice (MYI) extents, as well as an examination of Surface Air Temperature (SAT), Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB)
Model which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR)
prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere, and sea ice predictors.
Prediction of September 2010 sea ice concentration in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago from a
statistical model (canonical correlation analysis).
Prediction of July 2010 sea ice concentration anomalies in the Hudson Bay region from a
statistical model.
This is consistent with both the June and July (Figure 3) ensemble
predictions from a coupled ice - ocean
model submitted by Zhang, which show considerably more ice in the East Siberian Sea compared to 2009, and it is consistent with the June
statistical forecasts submitted by Tivy, which also predict a greater ice area than in 2009 and above - normal ice concentrations along the coasts.
Kapsch et al, 4.66 (± 0.59),
Statistical For the
prediction of the September sea - ice extent we use a simple linear regression
model that is only based on the atmospheric water vapor in spring (April / May).
Global Weather Climate Logistics, 5.44,
Statistical The Global Weather and Climate Logistic's prediction is based on two statistical models that incorporate between 10 and 20 surface, atmospheric and oceanic
Statistical The Global Weather and Climate Logistic's
prediction is based on two
statistical models that incorporate between 10 and 20 surface, atmospheric and oceanic
statistical models that incorporate between 10 and 20 surface, atmospheric and oceanic variables.
Canadian Ice Service, 4.7 (± 0.2), Heuristic /
Statistical (same as June) The 2015 forecast was derived by considering a combination of methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end - of - winter Arctic ice thickness extents, as well as winter Surface Air Temperature, Sea Level Pressure and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) a simple statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice
Statistical (same as June) The 2015 forecast was derived by considering a combination of methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end - of - winter Arctic ice thickness extents, as well as winter Surface Air Temperature, Sea Level Pressure and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) a simple
statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice
statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based
Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR)
prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predictors.
Slater, 4.55 (± 0.35),
Statistical I have extended my
model prediction out to a lead time of 53 days.
Kapsch et al., 4.1 (± 0.5),
Statistical (same as June) For the
prediction of the September sea - ice extent we use a simple linear regression
model that is only based on the atmospheric water vapor in spring (April / May).
Slater (SPIE), 4.4 (± 0.75),
Statistical I have extended my
model prediction out to a lead time of 85 days.
As with previous CIS contributions, the 2016 forecast was derived by considering a combination of methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end - of - winter Arctic ice thickness / extent, as well as winter surface air temperature, spring ice conditions and the summer temperature forecast; 2) a simple
statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based
Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September sea ice extent time - series into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR)
prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predictors.
For the first time, scientists have compared the latest
predictions for global warming with a range of
statistical models, commonly used to predict the spread of malaria.
For example, the median
prediction of heuristically - based contributions is 4.4 million km2, compared with 4.75 for
statistical and 4.7 for
modeling.
Kapsch et al, 4.75 (4.13 - 5.37),
Statistical For the
prediction of the September sea - ice extent we use a simple linear regression
model that is only based on the atmospheric water vapor in spring (April / May).
That the duration of each
prediction of a
model is 50 years implies that the duration of each independent
statistical event in the complete set of these events is 50 years.
Because these relationships can be subtle and complex,
statistical models combining multiple parameters are expected to be more effective than individual monthly data at making
predictions.
If the actual data to be plotted does not show rapid and unprecedented warming in the late 20th century, then why would the
statistical science of climate
model prediction give us high CO2 sensitivity and doomsday
predictions for the middle / end of this century?
These weights allow for an objective,
statistical prediction of global mean temperature fluctuations arising solely from SST - associated internal variability within a given
model.
As discussed above, it is possible to overfit the
statistical model during the calibration period, which has the effect of underestimating the
prediction error.
Nor have Christy et al. corrected the serious
statistical error in their 2007 International Journal of Climatology paper, «A comparison of tropical temperature trends with
model predictions,» a post-Wegman paper, but it speaks to their credibility.
Finally, there's consensus that we can not look at climate forecasts — in particular, probabilistic forecasts — the same way we view weather
predictions, and none of us would sell climate -
model output, either at face value or after
statistical analysis, as a reliable representation of the complete range of possible futures.
Liljegren (Public Contribution); 4.6 + 0.9;
Statistical Prediction is based on using the JAXA sea ice extent from July 28, 2011 in a linear regression
model based on July 28 sea ice extents and September minimum values since 2002.
Grumbine and Wu (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration); 4.6 Million Square Kilometers;
Statistical and Numerical
Modeling Model - based
prediction using April 2010 starting conditions.