Sentences with phrase «stats speak for»

The stats speak for themselves.

The stats speak for themselves: for every dollar of income, we owe an average of $ 1.67.

The stats speak for themselves.

The stats speak for themselves as every our, 542,000 player transfers are happening in FIFA Ultimate Team (FUT).

The Stats speak for themselves here, it's got some great Handling and Stability but its Impact is really poor.

The stats speak for themselves: for every dollar of income, we owe an average of $ 1.67.

Look at the long - term returns of stocks over bonds — I think the stats speak for themselves.»

The stats speak for themselves.

Birth Boot Camp's stats speak for themselves.

Lewandowksi would be my very first choice, but there is not chance of him leaving BM, hence why I think Martinez would be the next best choice as his goal scoring stats speak for themselves (28 goals in 38 appearances, 7 CL goals).

so hater gonna hate thats how life is but he said it countless times he does nt care let his stats speak for him..

The only problem there is that we don't have anyone who can take Coquelin's place if anything happens to him (the stats speak for themselves).

The stats speak for themselves and that anthem (that once again we do not sing daily) is outdated, just like your imaginary friend.

Not exact matches

I believe that on modern marketing teams, technology plays a pivotal role in everyone's jobs, and this stat speaks to the need for someone to «stitch it all together.»

Miyoko tells readers, «you probably recycle, shop at farmer's markets, buy local as much as you can...» She goes on to offer some staggering stats about animals raised for human consumption that I'm not sure a lot of non-vegans have considered -LCB- at least not most of the ones I have spoken to -RCB-- some research has shown vegans use approximately 90 percent less water, energy, resources and land to raise their food than do omnivores.

I even thought top clubs were in for him.Some three or 2 seasons back many here were debating why he should be our main striker.As soon as you mention any other strikers name people would come out with stats and many things defending him.Even Wenger has defended him blindly in the past.People say Wenger's stubborn yeah.But don't we know that there's a reason why everything happens?Honestly speaking he's the reason why Arsene Wenger has failed to sign a top notch striker because he still believes in him.The funny thing is we signed Welbeck at that time who to me did nothing before to be the main man here.People keep saying Welbeck is hardworking and that he works his socks off.But the question is was that our reason for signing him.Welbeck being signed to challenge Giroud tells me a lot about Giroud's quality.Even Walcott (no offence to him) who has zero CF qualities was even chosen over him for a string of games and all in all I think he did well but has too many defeciencies for that role.We've compromised as a club and it'll come back to bite us.

As long as you support your club through the hard times and good times then you are a fan regardless of what you say it is about the heart not the words but the heart.Also not only stats are facts but they might also be quiet misleading.For Afobe i will not comment anymore but i do know for sure that he will reach my expectation and maybe you do not see it that way and you might feel i am not speaking with facts or whatever but life itself has no formula and is not really bound by facts because we make the facts.Afobe can become a world class player and i do not care if any manager in the EPL does not see it that way but i see it that way.For talent is given to the one who can harness it and once things go right then i expect him to be there.No one can take that away from him.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

Since I'm not an Arteta hater, I won't speak for the fans that do like to pick on him, but I don't believe Wenger keeps selecting him for stats, but for the fact that he (still) is our captain.

If stats told the whole story we would all speak in stat speak and walk around like binary drones with only positive and negative or yes and no, or o and 1 for our output.

Ozil has been better playmaker and scorer than fabregas in duration since his return, and to be accredited for ten goals in thirteen games is top quality maybe those stats speak more.

«while the Spaniard's creative stats have spoken for themselves since Wenger dropped him into a deeper role.»

To be fair to the boss, if Ramsey had been performing and banging in the goals from the middle like he was a couple of years ago, the decision would have been tougher, but injury problems and a loss of form meant that Ramsey was not the killer he had been, while the Spaniard's creative stats have spoken for themselves since Wenger dropped him into a deeper role.

So we spoke to nutrition experts to get the pros, cons, nutrition stats, and more for the eight most popular types.

Speaking to Seb, Fitness and PT manager, he said: «From a trainer's perspective it's a no - brainer, our members might only work out with me two days a week, but with MYZONE tracking I can pull up their stats and review what their workouts were like for the three days in between our sessions and ensure they are staying on track and encourage them to keep going.»

Australians are on of the most open - minded people on the planet, naturally an exciting no strings attached way to meet new people like the one offered by Saucy Dating must have a section for OZ, besides, the stats from survey carried out speaks for it self:

The stats show that players are taking advantage of these factors, and the sales speak for themselves.

It is very hard to know whether it is a majority among scientists, and the «stats» have been thoroughly muddied by recruiting the executives and administrations of professional societies to «speak for» the members.

And btw, speaking of Loehle / Scafetta, none other than Willis Eschenbach took L / S to task at WUWT for what he said was improper use of stats.

Speaking to stats and failure to sell rates, one of the most important stats, and seldom noted, although quoted forever in internal educational discussions: it is purported to be that only 50 % of listings ever sell; at least the first time offered for sale.