This suggests that he would have found that there was a prima facie case of family
status discrimination whether he followed the Campbell River or the Johnstone approach.
Not exact matches
Further, regardless of
whether either sexual orientation or transgender
status is a legally - protected
status, we do not tolerate
discrimination on the basis of a person's sexual orientation.
The ECOA forbids credit
discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital
status, age, or
whether you receive income from a public assistance program.
(https://nwlc.org/resources/nondiscrimination-protection-affordable-care-act-section-1557/) But it's unclear to me
whether and how it prohibits
discrimination based on other factors - for example, employment
status or income.
Factor 4.1, «Equal treatment and absence of
discrimination,» measures
whether individuals are free from
discrimination - based on socio - economic
status, gender, ethnicity, religion, national origin, or sexual orientation, or gender identity - including with respect to public services, employment, court proceedings, and the justice system.
I need not further discuss the Board's analysis of case law dealing with the question of
whether work requirements that impact an employee's breastfeeding schedule constitute
discrimination on the basis of sex or family
status.
The Tribunal also accepted the argument that an assessment of
whether a claimant had made reasonable efforts to meet family
status obligations (i.e. to self - accommodate) does not belong at the prima facie
discrimination stage.
Cases such as this largely depend on their particular facts, although the board did rely on the principles set out by the Federal Court of Appeal's Johnstone decision to determine
whether there was a prima facie case of
discrimination based on family
status.
Until recently, it had been unclear
whether the Tribunal would follow the course set in Misetich, but the decision in Ananda v Humber College Institute of Technology & Advanced Learning [«Ananda»] confirms that the Tribunal is intent on using the Misetich test for claims of
discrimination on the prohibited ground of family
status.
The court used a four - part test to determine
whether a complainant has presented a prima facie case of
discrimination on the prohibited ground of family
status:
It has not yet been decided by an Irish court
whether this refusal amounts to
discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation under the Equal
Status Act 2000 or the Equality Act 2004.
HUD will investigate complaints alleging that a landlord inquired into a person's immigration
status or citizenship to see
whether national origin
discrimination may have occurred.»
A federal court has considered
whether a tenant could move forward with his race and familial
status discrimination allegations against former landlord.
Regulation B and the ECOA protect applicants to and borrowers of loans from
discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital
status, age,
whether the applicant derives income from a public assistance program, or
whether the applicant has exercised in good faith any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act.