Not exact matches
They still have to comply
with federal and state laws, which means gays are out, but everyone else has to be considered for employment by the company (the only exceptions to the law are where your religion or
other protected
status are essential for the job... for example, a Muslim couldn't sue an Episcopalian
church who wouldn't hire them in an administrative role because their faith clashes
with that of the
church — things like that don't apply to a fast food chain).
The government should not be permitted to create incentives for religious practice or belief (like giving favored
status to religious organizations, as compared to
other nonprofits), to facilitate the religious practices of some at the expense of
others (like offering vocal prayers in public schools), or to accommodate one religion but not
others with similar needs or problems (like limiting draft exemptions to members of traditional «peace
churches») Within these guidelines, religious accommodations are fully in keeping
with the First Amendment — albeit in conflict
with strict separation.
The danger of the Bob Jones decision is that if the university can be forced to comply
with public policy in order to retain its tax
status, then all
other nonprofit institutions —
with churches listed first in the tax regulation — can be forced to do likewise.
This constitutional disestablishment of all
churches embodied the wisdom of Roger Williams and Thomas Jefferson — the one from his experience
with the Massachusetts theocracy and the
other from his experience
with the less dangerous Anglican establishment in Virginia — which knew that a combination of religious sanctity and political power represents a heady mixture for
status quo conservatism.
While Morelos's Constitution of Apatzingán was never put into practice, the plan of Iguala (1821), drawn up by Iturbide after independence, also confirmed the official
status of Catholicism as the state religion and denied toleration to all
other religions.32 The war for independence, in
other words, was reasonably conservative in purpose, especially
with respect to the
church.
Though there are people among the «priestly class», as you call it, that use the doctrine of inspiration to lord their educated / professional
status over the average
church members, there are plenty of
others (such as my pastor, and probably most every Calvary Chapel pastor) who approach their charge as shepherds of the flock
with the proper attitude of a helper and clarifier to the flock seeking to understand the meaning of the Bible.
But
others are much more worldly in their investments, where being even just a superficial
church going, one gets club membership
with community
status, feelings of belonging, feelings of self - worth, feeling of being upright and hopes that their kids will grow up moral and they can stave off a very more tragedies of illness and disasters through god - magic.
Its attitudes are found in every branch of Christendom: the quest for negative
status, the elevation of minor issues to a place of major importance, the use of social mores as a norm of virtue, the toleration of one's own prejudice but not the prejudice of
others, the confusion of the
church with a denomination, and the avoidance of prophetic scrutiny by using the Word of God as an instrument of self - security but not self - criticism.
On the
other hand, remember that the
church has a tendency to bed down
with mediocrity, to accept the
status quo and to let itself off the theological hook too easily.
From Greece the centre of that culture was to move gradually to Italy and over the centuries cultures built themselves on top of
others with dizzying density; Christian Rome on top of Pagan Rome, the Goths, Vandals, Lombards, successively on top of Ancient Rome, reducing it through wars often to village
status, the Normans from the north of Europe meeting up
with Byzantine and even Islamic cultures, traces of which can indeed be found in Benevento in the twelfth century in cloisters of the
Church of Santa Sofia; the battles of Guelphs and Ghibelines, the Renaissance in all its glory and seemingly endless histories down to the disastrous vainglories of Fascism».9