Sentences with phrase «statutory nuisance»

Statutory nuisance remedies were intended to be speedy, cheap and readily accessible to ordinary people, but most recent news stories show that the complexities of recent laws and further technical difficulties have led to cases becoming long, drawn out and...

Between them they have many years of experience and have worked on many high profile cases involving statutory nuisance and other areas of environmental law.

Statutory Nuisance, Third Edition provides a practical breakdown of the law and a clear demonstration of how it can be applied in practice.

· The Court of Appeal decisions in Watson v Croft Promo Motor Sport and Coventry v Lawrence on noise nuisance abatement notices · The decisions in Barr v Biffa and Ethos Recycling on the relationship of other regulatory regimes to statutory nuisance · New Equality Act 2011 · The new civil procedure for abatement appeal as contained in the Magistrates» · Courts (Amendment) Rules 2009 and The Crown Court (Amendment) Rules 2009 · Criminal Procedure Rules 2011

Statutory nuisance remedies were intended to be speedy, cheap and readily accessible to ordinary people, but most recent news stories show that the complexities of recent laws and further technical difficulties have led to cases becoming long, drawn out and prohibitively expensive.

Launching this week, the new third edition of Statutory Nuisance seeks to help redress this balance by providing a readily accessible and practical guide to the statutory nuisance regime.

Statutory Nuisance, Third Edition Robert McCracken QC, Gregory Jones QC & James Pereira How helpful are statutory nuisance laws?

UK Halal certification bodies are not accountable or supervised by any public body, and therefore consumers have little to go on beyond trusting the producers, says barrister John Pointing, of Statutory Nuisance Solutions.

He qualified to practice English law in 2008 and has since advised both public and private sector clients on a variety of property disputes including debt - related claims, unauthorised traveler encampments and statutory nuisance claims.

A bit like the first time a complaint was laid by a tenant against his council landlord alleging a statutory nuisance under the Public Health Act 1936: the first cheeseburger.

In addition, while S. 79 & 80 of the Environmental Protection Act covered Statutory Nuisance, Mr Peaker clarified that this only applies to premises where the statutory nuisance in question is prejudicial to the health of the tenant.

Barking is classed as a «statutory nuisance» under the 1990 Environmental Protection Act and owners of persistent offenders are liable to fines of up to # 2000.

Acting for food production businesses, transport operators, manufacturing and engineering businesses and other commercial operators in the successful appeals of numerous abatement notices for statutory nuisances arising from diverse sources including food odours, industrial noise, odours from waste operations, dog barking, church bells and fireworks.

Not exact matches

«TCC claims 2.1 The following are examples of the types of claim which it may be appropriate to bring as TCC claims --(a) building or other construction disputes, including claims for the enforcement of the decisions of adjudicators under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996; (b) engineering disputes; (c) claims by and against engineers, architects, surveyors, accountants and other specialised advisers relating to the services they provide; (d) claims by and against local authorities relating to their statutory duties concerning the development of land or the construction of buildings; (e) claims relating to the design, supply and installation of computers, computer software and related network systems; (f) claims relating to the quality of goods sold or hired, and work done, materials supplied or services rendered; (g) claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant; (h) claims between neighbours, owners and occupiers of land in trespass, nuisance etc; (i) claims relating to the environment (for example, pollution cases); (j) claims arising out of fires; (k) claims involving taking of accounts where these are complicated; and (l) challenges to decisions of arbitrators in construction and engineering disputes including applications for permission to appeal and appeals.»

Willie has prosecuted and defended claims involving breach of contract, tortious interference, state and federal antitrust, common law and statutory fraud, misappropriation of trade secrets, negligent misrepresentation, business disparagement, state and federal securities actions, product liability, nuisance, trespass, conversion, insurance coverage, corporate governance, breach of fiduciary duty, shareholder oppression, and qui tam.

Property issues and disputes of all types, including: contracts for the acquisition, development and management of land; options and conditional contracts; overage claims; project management and similar contracts; mortgages and other security arrangements, including enforcement disputes; planning and other statutory issues connected with property contracts; leases of all types; landlord and tenant disputes (particularly commercial — including retail, leisure and distribution — and residential); rent reviews; leasehold enfranchisement; rights over land (including easements, covenants and rights of light); trespass and nuisance claims; disputed asset disposals; estate agency; property - related competition law issues; and commons and village greens.

At first instance, the policyholder successfully recovered the costs of remedying the damage (but not the cost of works to prevent future leakages) on the basis that the policy covered liability arising out of damage resulting from pollution (which expressly included «nuisance», despite the fact that the policyholder also had a statutory obligation to remediate the damage).

Nonsmokers have filed lawsuits against landlords or fellow tenants on the basis of nuisance, breach of statutory duty to keep the premises habitable, breach of the common law covenant of peaceful enjoyment, negligence, harassment, battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress; courts have ruled for and against nonsmokers in individual cases.

The claim may be capable of pursuit notwithstanding that the defendant is protected from a claim in nuisance by virtue of the statutory authority defence.

It should not cover damages for injury sustained otherwise than in road traffic accidents, for example, employer's negligence or breach of statutory duty, claims against local authorities or occupiers, nuisance claims or assault claims.»