Not exact matches
It's a
film brimming with many top notch performances, and the super-long
Steadicam shots are certainly impressive, but at the end
of the day I didn't feel too attached to anyone on screen.
It can never quite figure out what kind
of film it wants to be, however, mixing deep thoughts about artificial intelligence (A.I.) with crazy drunken synchronized dancing (which, I will admit, was extremely fun to watch), and although it has fine cinematographic elements that are reminiscent
of the best
of Stanley Kubrick (slow tracking
shots, some on
steadicam), if one ponders the subject matter for more than a minute or two, it all seems very dumb.
Much
of the technology behind the extended long take had to be specially made for the
shoot — the ultralight
steadicam rig, the ultrahigh capacity battery packs, etc — yet, what makes the
film such a magnificent technical achievement is it's incredible organization
of bodies throughout the hour and half exploration.
He can't decide how realistic he wants Parents to play — the
film opens with a series
of home video
shots and there's some
Steadicam later on, but it's mostly static.