CRISPR has been touted as the next
step for human evolution, but a new paper may cast doubt on its effectiveness.
Not exact matches
Second: The Creation tale is simply a way
for early
humans to explain mans creation and «fall» from God's predetermined path... The old testament is full of stuff more related to philosophy and health advice then «Gods word» However, this revelation has not made me less of a christian... In Contrast to those stuck in «the old ways» regarding faith (not believing in neanderthals and championing the claim that earth is only 6000 years old), I believe God created the universe on the very principle of physics and
evolution (and other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms was the first
step in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and us.
But Soleri is not waiting passively
for this next
step in
human evolution to occur.
* The role of the US in global efforts to address pollutants that are broadly dispersed across national borders, such as greenhouse gasses, persistent organic pollutants, ozone, etc...; * How they view a president's ability to influence national science policy in a way that will persist beyond their term (s), as would be necessary
for example to address global climate change or enhancement of science education nationwide; * Their perspective on the relative roles that scientific knowledge, ethics, economics, and faith should play in resolving debates over embryonic stem cell research,
evolution education,
human population growth, etc... * What specific
steps they would take to prevent the introduction of political or economic bias in the dissemination and use of scientific knowledge; * (and many more...)