Sentences with phrase «stick to the science when»

As such, I prefer to stick to the science when making my determinations on whether I'll employ a vaccine or not.

Not exact matches

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...
They like to stick their fingers in their ears and scream when you try and quote any fact based science at them.
This is well backed by much literature, science and research, especially as we are growing in our understanding of trauma, its impact and how to heal from it when we get stuck in trauma responses.
And when that unit of the curriculum is up, you know, when that's happening I want Johnny to say, «Here's what I believe» and I want the teacher to say, «Here's what we think the best evidence in science says» and let that kid go home and say, «Mom and Dad, I really stuck it to him» because that kind of conversation I think is important.
Many VC companies don't have experience with science, and after being burnt badly when the dotcom bubble burst, these days most tend to stick to what sectors they know best.
Science sets out what we think is true — but when it gets stuck, it's time to explore what we think isn't
WHEN Mostafa Ahmadi - Roshan, a chemist at the Natanz uranium enrichment plant in Iran, was killed on 11 January by a magnetic bomb stuck to his car, he became the fifth such victim in Iran, according to William Tobey of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University.
When you stick a limb on your creature, wouldn't it be nice to have an optional pop - up window that explains the real (and fascinating) science behind limb evolution?
And when I went back to the skits somebody had written a comment like — it was probably ruder than this — «You had a good thing going there, you should have stuck with the science videos.»
When it comes to supplements, you might having trouble choosing what's most adequate for your goals, given the great number of choices with different price ranges we have today, but the best idea is to stick with those supported by science in terms of efficacy and safety.
When you're experiencing nausea, «you want to stick to simple, bland foods that your stomach can easily tolerate,» Rena Zelig, RDN, assistant professor of nutritional sciences at Rutgers University, previously told Health.
When I have heard Dr. Ornish speak in the last 2 years he seems to be sticking with fish oil despite the lack of science supporting its use.
Exiting is not an exact science, and there are times when deviating from your initial exit plan makes sense, but you should always decide before you enter a trade what your ideal exit strategy is and then try to stick to that plan as much as possible.
There is no need to bet when you stick to the science (and measured data and observations as much as possible).
That pretty much is how skeptics feel when trying to have an intelligent conversation with global warming alarmist — especially when they can not even admit Mann's hockey stick is political and more social than science.
Why stick to picking apart hidden meanings and agendas when there is a plate full of delicious science to rip into?
Hello Jim, the reply from the paid liars at the Weather Underground gives us another example of how critical is is to stick to the science terms when trying to share information on the climate engineering insanity.
Can this be even started when the «hockey stick» is so blatantly used (by the IPCC and others) to provoke political / policy changes based on bad science and bad processing of that data?
We as new and original mathematicians of Climate Science pose: scientific descent will be proven if you regurgitate the hockey - stick rammed down your throat, again and again until accepted or when denied, to hasten your personal integrity and intellectual demise.
When questioned about new and more worrying climate science she stonewalled and stuck to the party line.
So its going to turn into an area where any true discussion based on the science of the specific aspect — ice free Artic, sea level rise (when, where and how much)-- will be missing and any chance of actual education will be gone if the standard «opponents» get used in the discussions and they stick to their standard behaviors when discussing anything to do with climate change.
Thats what I mean when I say stick to the science.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z