Sentences with phrase «still argue against it»

I never use it and would still argue against it, but it adds some functionality you won't get in Chrome.

For those who still argue against the facts, I would simply ask you to consider this: What if you are wrong?

Given that, would you still argue against oil usage?

I still argue against the jump scare tactic, in which something suddenly happens and an ear - bustingly loud noise plays on the soundtrack, but I understand the concern.

Not understanding this simplest of concepts, but still arguing against this point seems somewhat childish.

Not exact matches

Still, Khodorkovsky is urging people to «get off the couch» and vote next month, arguing against a boycott like that suggested by Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny.

Although the earnings growth for the company may have slowed down in recent years, for me it is still hard to argue against a behemoth of a company like this.

Still, many experts argue that annuities at least provide some insurance against outliving your assets.

Still, the most compelling reason to argue against expensive weddings is that while many things needed for a memorable wedding cost money, the most important ones — a kiss at the altar, a mother's tear as she sees her son make a lifelong commitment — are free.

As late as the 16th century Martin Luther the «father of the Protestant Reformation» was still arguing for the books of Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation to be dropped from the New Testament altogether because he perceived them to go against some of the doctrines he was promoting.

When he could not argue against Karl Friedrich he simply commented, «You may knock my block off, but I shall still believe in God.

But even without religious beliefs, we'd still not all agree on things like that, so here's a more practical reason to argue against religion:

The very fact that, in 2012, a presidential candidate from one party can create instant headlines by arguing against a speech made by a presidential candidate of the other party, more than 50 years ago, should be enough to convince any fair - minded American that we still have much work to do as we try to reason with each other about these questions.

@Todd — but either way (regarding my last post)-- I would think one could just as easily argue that there is still nothing «immaterial» about the tendency for the mind to behave similarly against certain situations.

The book was so well argued that it is still widely credited, even by non-believers, for successfully rebutting this particular charge against God's existence.

Right, people still in the system, who still buy into some of this stuff are the best to argue against those Southern Baptists — sad as that is.

Even if an uncritical relationship between the church and science does not totally ideologize Christianity, we still have history's word that the ambiguous nature of many scientific achievements argues against the church's unqualified sponsorship of them.

He argued that a Christian facing problems at work with religious expression needed to consider their position and that they were not discriminated against if they still had «the choice of leaving their job and finding new employment».

Although some may argue that we weren't playing against the top level opposition that we see in the Premier League and Champions League, it's also easy to forget that a lot of our players still aren't fully fit.

Still, when looking at the names now added to the mix, you can't argue against Inter who seem to have done enough to compete for Champions League allocation.

Trump had been publicly discussing ending the agreement, so one could argue that Kerry may have broken the spirit of the law, (or you could argue that he was simply acting as a lobbyist and 100 % legally because the meeting was regarding existing policy), but even if you take the argument that he deliberately went against what Trump was proposing as a likely outcome, Kerry didn't violate the Logan act because it was still policy at the time.

The Violence Against Women Bill still does not go far enough with regards to educating young people about behaviour and relationships, the Welsh Liberal Democrats will argue today.

Still, some council members chafed at her role: The councilwoman who led the fight against Mayor Michael Bloomberg's bid to build a West Side Stadium in 2005, one argued, had suddenly become the most visible advocate for a new Manhattan arena.

Still, some Republicans had argued against the measure because they said it would depreciate property values.

Mr. Cuomo, reacting to the mass protests against police brutality that have convulsed the country since grand juries failed to indict police officers in the deaths of black men in Staten Island and Ferguson, Mo., argued that «today, sadly, too many people are questioning if the blindfold is still intact or does the justice system now see black and white or black and blue or rich and poor.»

Insisting that Labour can still win the election without the need of Liberal Democrat support, he argues: «This is a progressive moment,» claiming «there is no rebellion against collectivism in the country» akin to the late 70s.

People argue against it by saying, «Hey, you know the carbon footprint of flying food thousands of miles is ridiculous so we should grow [things] locally» but the counter argument is, but if you can grow so much wheat sufficiently in Kansas even including the transportation for thousands of miles it's still more efficient in terms of resources.

Still, for «tweens and teens looking for adventure in cinema - land, it's hard to argue against this well executed film.

Still, I'm never going to argue against about bout between Will Graham (Hugh Dancy) and Hannibal (Mads Mikkelsen).

Still, after returning 28 mpg over more than 300 miles of mixed city / highway commuting conditions, it's hard to argue against the hybrid powertrain's execution.

Still, Hoyes has seen enough senior debt to argue against taking on more.

Although the earnings growth for the company may have slowed down in recent years, for me it is still hard to argue against a behemoth of a company like this.

But if you think Fustey is building a case against passive investing, think again: he argues that indexing still offers investors their best chance of success.

Critics have argued that some tactics employed by animal advocates, including protests, risk turning public opinion against the animal advocacy movement.212 While these activities make up a small proportion of THL's work, they do organize and participate in protests and demonstrations.213 While THL carefully targets their protests with specific goals in mind and tries to project a professional image through their protests, it's possible that they could still draw negative governmental attention or lower public opinion of advocates.214

But even if I'm now arguing in favor instead of against a card, it will still be more interesting than arguing in favor of the Sapphire Preferred, which you've all heard too much about.

«Yes there are those who argue against the need for national tourism boards in the wake of the huge changes in the way we live, in the way we travel, and in the way we communicate in comparison to just 50 years ago, but I am one who still believes that the national tourism boards still have an important role to play, even if that role has to change in order to accommodate the modern world, and in order to make the most of the advantage it offers.

Versus look a lot better anyway and I give thanks to GOD because at least I still have something to brag about when arguing against all my xbox fanboys friends... There are Xbox fanboys everywhere but in this website.

Against this sort of background, it's perhaps understandable that I should have sided with McKeever, who seemed to offer in his paintings and his writings so much that I couldn't argue with: «In the present climate of all - knowing, self - conscious art, where just about everything is a critique of something or other, there is still the need, even an urgent need, for something as unadorned as (the) simple painting.

Sadly, your kettle analogy does argue against the position you still continue to occupy like the corpses of the forlorn hope prior to the burial detail's arrival.

It is not particularly surprising that they could not find one to argue against the reality of carbon emissions - driven global warming, but it still seems a bit of an unfair difference in stature to have the position backed up by corporate - sponsored pseudoscience be represented by a member of Congress, against a man known primarily for shouting «science!»

For instance there are still those who argue against Einstein.

There are still many people who deny the fact that climate change is a real and important thing, but there is one thing nobody can try and argue against.

It's the same issue raised by people arguing against blowing up an asteroid, that it turns a single small cannonball into a very large shotgun blast with the same total energy being delivered and delivering it to the atmosphere is still a problem.

Cohen tries to explain this away by arguing that Exxon only funded such groups because they were against the Kyoto Protocol (which it still firmly rejects) and not because they vehemently denied the existence of global warming.

In her speech, she had some harsh words for those who still try to pit the labor movement and environmentalists against one another — and argued that the real promise for job creation lies in restructuring our economy in a more sustainable manner.

I'm not arguing against the science, I'm cautioning that the enthusiasts sound like they're making the same argument still currently being made for sidestream tobacco, and methylmercury, and CO2 emission from fossil fuel.

But if some offshore drilling and nuclear power entitlements get us comprehensive energy reform, along with a cap and trade system to limit greenhouse gas emissions, I'd argue that it's still worth doing (though I know many who'd argue against it).

Others still championed LSPs as important for meeting the access to justice gap, but argued against their regulation by state courts on the grounds either it is unnecessary (they are already regulated by consumer protection laws), that it would unnecessarily increase costs, or that regulation would only enable the state bars and courts to exercise their «protectionist instincts» (see this response, this response and this response).

While I'm less worried about being found in contempt for arguing with a judge than I used to be (the 2003 addition of «civility» to the oath attorneys and judges are required to take has changed judges» behavior more than it has attorneys» because some judges were perpetually officious prior to this civility requirement), I still don't want to risk a judge ruling against my client's position or failing to award my client fees because that judge feels I treated him or her rudely.

However, it is still likely that in practice a detailed forensic examination will be necessary to try and quantify what the correct beneficial interest should be when arguing against the presumption of an equal share.