Sentences with phrase «still as a food source»

Because they consider eggs still as a food source, they will still purchase meals at restaurants and grocery store items that contain eggs, which certainly came from farms where the hens suffered even greater.

Not exact matches

So while it's true that you don't need to be as concerned about counting calories from these food sources, you still might want to stick to recommended serving sizes when trying to lose weight.

Residents of Siberian cities get their food from three main sources: grocery stores (still not as modern as those in the West); city markets, farmers» markets, and street vendors; and their own dacha gardens where they grow fruits and vegetables on little plots of land surrounding the cities.

We are still just as committed to giving people fresh, unprocessed food, ethically produced from sources you can trust.

Because low - fat milk is a readily available source of calcium without as many calories or as much fat, a milk shake would still be considered a junk food by most people and should be only an occasional treat.

So families who are in the homes, I'd say if it's a family that's going home from the NICU experience and the baby is just not transferring to another food source or the mom's still working on her milk supply we can provide donor milk to the home as well, and that's shipped overnight express to the mom's home and it's all you know shipped frozen in glass bottles.

Because of the addition of solid food, Baby's dependence on milk as a primary source of nutrients drops, however intake of milk is still important at snack time and before bed.

You should still eat a healthy diet based on the food pyramid; at least 6 portions of starchy foods (bread, cereal, pasta and rice), 5 servings or more of fruit and vegetables, 2 - 3 portions of meat, fish and other protein sources, and increase to 5 portions of dairy products such as milk, yoghurt and cheese.

But as I've talked about quite a bit on The Lunch Tray (starting with my very first post), it does concern me that our menu is currently still weighted almost entirely in favor of «kid food» (or what one source in Janet Poppendieck's Free For All calls «carnival fare»).

While it is true that most toddlers will be getting most of their nutrition from other sources, such as solid foods, cow's milk, etc., breastmilk can still provide a lot of added nutrition into their diet.

Although you may be eager to teach your child to eat solid food, avoid feeding them too early because babies still need milk as their primary source of nutrients.

Nursing moms should remember that the solid food is not meant to offer nutritional value — breast milk should still be the primary food source as it is superior to solid foods.

There still seems something unpleasant about shifting our view of these animals towards a source of food rather than as companions on the same planet.

Although the metabolic rate is increased after eating a meal, the foods comprising the meal are still broken down and are mostly stored as a backup energy source.

When clients consume few processed, junky foods and emphasise fruit, vegetables, nuts, seeds and lean protein sources, they often make the mistake of believing they can eat as much as they like and still lose weight.

That being said, I would still consider paleo people my brethen as we all eschew processed foods and seek to know the source of our food.

The New York Times has been a strong advocate for lowfat diets, even for children, yet a recent NYT article noted that vitamin - A-rich foods like liver, egg yolk, cream and shellfish confer resistance to infectious diseases in children and prevent cancer in adults.13 A Washington Post article hailed vitamin A as «cheap and effective, with wonders still being (re) discovered,» noting that recent studies have found that vitamin - A supplements help prevent infant mortality in Third World countries, protect measles victims from severe complications and prevent mother - to - child transmission of HIV virus.14 The article lists butter, egg yolk and liver as important sources of vitamin A, but claims, unfortunately, that carotenes from vegetables are «equally important.»

And for a vegan bodybuilder who must unfortunatelly play tetris with the food sources that he choses in order to give to his body the right ammounts of aminos, restricting SPI and soy foods so much does not make his goal any easier.There are sometimes that you need a meal thats complete with aminos and soy provides that meal with the additional benefits of lacking the saturated fats trans cholesterol and other endothelium inflammatory factors.I'm not saying that someone should go all the way to 200gr of SPI everyday or consuming a kilo of soy everyday but some servings of soy now and then even every day or the use of SPI which helps in positive nitrogen balance does not put you in the cancer risk team, thats just OVERexaggeration.Exercise, exposure to sunlight, vegan diet or for those who can not something as close to vegan diet, fruits and vegetables which contains lots of antioxidants and phtochemicals, NO STRESS which is the global killer, healthy social relationships, keeping your cortisol and adrenaline levels down (except the necessary times), good sleep and melatonin function, clean air, no radiation, away from procceced foods and additives like msg etc and many more that i can not even remember is the key to longevity.As long as your immune system is functioning well and your natural killer cells TP53 gene and many other cancer inhibitors are good and well, no cancer will ever show his face to you.With that logic we shouldn't eat ANY ammount of protein and we should go straight to be breatharians living only with little water and sunlight exposure cause you like it or not the raise of IGF1 is inevitable i know that raise the IGF1 sky high MAYBE is not the best thing but we are not talking about external hormones and things like this.Stabby raccoon also has a point.And even if you still worry about the consumption of soy... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21711174.

You can source bottled tomatoes paste, but they are not as convenient and the caps are plasticized so one is still getting BPA's or BPS's in their food.

I try to get as much protein from whole food sources as possible, but I do still use whey protein after my workout.

Today, these nutrient - rich algae are being used around the world to help treat illness and are being seriously discussed as a sustainable source of food with the potential to end world hunger.3 Unlike most plants, which need to be cultivated and nurtured, spirulina is a survivor, able to withstand extreme temperature variations and neglect and still thrive.

While tofu is a nice source of protein, it's still a processed food and should be consumed as such: in moderation.

Even though tripe is still considered a food source for humans in a variety of cultures, many think of tripe as a new and novel protein for dogs or cats.

If she is still sensitive to these foods, you'll be better off opting for a grain - free dog food that uses vegetables like sweet potatoes as a source of carbohydrates.

But it was cold this winter and C02 is plant food and only a trace gas and the greenhouse effect has been disproved anyway and even if the greenhouse effect does exist, C02 has negligible impact compared to water vapour and our only source of heat is the sun so it must be the sun, unless it is due to the C02 from volcanoes, but C02 follows warming so it can't be the C02 and the medieval warm period was warmer anyway and all the temperature reconstructions that show this not to be true are produced by corrupt scientists being paid by corrupt governments that have colluded to create an excuse to form a one world unelected social - ist government and even if the scientists are not that corrupt, although the e-mails prove they are, they have still got it wrong as the climate sensitivity is not as high as they think it is because it is basically the planets orbits and cosmic rays so we can say for a fact that the warming that probably does not exist is definatley not due to humans and even if it was the evidence is not sufficient to make drastic changes to the economy and increase taxes so that the politicians and scientists and business leaders get rich and leave us all poor — do they think we are stupid or something?