Sentences with phrase «still be business as usual»

EVEN if the sun were to quieten down appreciably for the rest of this century, it would still be business as usual for global warming.

His arrogance, naivety and myopic foresight made him to think it would still be business as usual.

Not exact matches

Etihad Airways may have faced turbulence in the last financial year, but its chief executive said it was still business as usual.

It sometimes seems like «business as usual» is still making it difficult for people to really feel like they are collaborating and communicating to get things done.

For Wirlu - murra it is still continues to be business as usual, with qualified WMYAC members still able to undertake important heritage survey work.

He said there was «impatience with a return to «business as usual» - represented by still - soaring bonuses and little visible change in banking practices.»

I still have thoughts and feelings for the families of those killed in the church in South Carolina including the pastor, and I am not quire ready to move on to business as usual with talk of wrong being done by pastors and «sheeple» enabling it.

So it's still business as usual?

After pen to paper is done its business as usual back to 4 -5-1 Giroud up top Holding benched, come March the excuses we didn't expect Cazorla to still be out Koscielnys red card was harsh Europa league is tougher than we expected the players are fatigued after a return to form in mid April I believe this team has unbelievable mental strength we have an fa cup final to play 18 other club would love to be in our position judge me at the end of the season.

wenger is a blend of corporate bagman and decent football manager... so its business as usual really... i still think that to take arsenal to next level requires him to leave... there is still time but if all that happens over next 6 weeks is we bring in a couple of rushed purchases towards the end of window i wouldnt be surprised....

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Business as usual... Just don't understand why we are still «swimming» into that circus of injuries...!!

There is more time than you might think because it is still not business as usual at Westminster.

Despite climate change posing an immediate existential threat for New York, the pensions still invest heavily in fossil fuel companies.Recent reports have revealed, at business as usual, New York City is at risk for Sandy - like flooding at least every 20 years.

Speaking to journalists at the end of the proceedings, Chairman of the Lagos State Anti-Land Grabbing Task Force, Mr. Jide Bakare said the administration of Governor Ambode, through the arraignment, was sending a strong message to others still involved in the act of forceful dispossession of property it would no longer be business as usual.

Many are calling the recent spate of political scandals a sign that it's still business as usual in Albany.

The carry on regardless, business as usual approach still being advocated by the leadership isn't going to work, we need urgent reforms to be enacted now, not after 2015.

But most investors and oil companies are betting on business as usual, with Shell still trying to find new fossil fuel reserves.

As late as the 1950s, the flames on the oily surface of the water were still viewed as business as usuaAs late as the 1950s, the flames on the oily surface of the water were still viewed as business as usuaas the 1950s, the flames on the oily surface of the water were still viewed as business as usuaas business as usuaas usual.

The study examined not just the «business as usual» case but also the effects under a moderate mitigation scenario, which showed that these dramatic, deadly effects can still be averted.

So for now it's business as usual in Sweden... which might mean still not getting very much business for your money.

Rather, the study looks at a range of possible future scenarios, says Garner, including the business - as - usual emissions path we are still on.

That's because «even in the worst - case scenario, which is business - as - usual, we still expect that ozone is going to decrease in the future because of ozone regulations in these particular countries,» Tai said in the phone interview.

Gladstone et al. (2012) also investigated the future of PIG, and they too found ongoing ice mass loss to be likely under a «business as usual scenario» (IPCC), with full collapse of the main trunk of PIG during the 22nd century still a possibility.

Sure, it can occasionally persuade me to swap heels for boots and tights, but even in Winter, I still default to my ole faithfuls.Thankfully I do have a few pieces, like this heavier wool blazer, that help me bundle up, but otherwise I'm business as usual.

Even the most boring film was still surrounded by this specialness, which set it apart from business - as - usual in the classroom.

And perhaps the most challenging aspect will be to prepare the workforce to be ready for those as yet non-existent jobs while still pursuing business as usual.

Inside, it's business as usual: you glimpse the carbonfibre monocoque as you raise the dramatic doors, the windscreen races over your head, the centre console seems so rakish it's almost flat, and you're still a bit too aware of Audi switchgear.

While in many families it would be big news if one member was to up and visit one of the most dangerous places on earth - a place where Mom had previously been shot at (though she always said they were shooting at the tires, not at her), where she had met with the military leader Ahmed Shah Massoud (who was later assassinated by two suicide bombers), where the Taliban still controlled much of the country, and where more than two hundred members of the U.S. and Coalition forces would die before the year was out - for our family it was business as usual.

The long wait times may be business as per usual for many larger publishers, which would probably still drive me crazy, but having the sequel sit in limbo during long wait times is a real concern for me.

Ok so here in Indonesia it's back to business as usual and the start of another surfing week, so those of you still kicking back with a long weekend enjoy.

Still, tache does mean «stain» or «blemish,» and he, too, is concerned for painting as process and as an affront to business as usual.

www.toddjames.com Born 1969, New York Lives and works in New York Solo exhibitions 2018 Love To Love You, Galería Javier López & Fer Francés, Madrid 2016 We Are One, Galería Javier López & Fer Francés, Madrid 2015 Fly Like the Wind, Nanzuka, Tokyo Fantasy Island, Lazarides Rathbone, London Pump Pump, Alice, Brussels 2014 Afternoon Delight, Aisho Nanzuka, Hong Kong Strange Days, Galería Javier López - Finca Cortesin, Casares, Malaga Secret Garden, Galleria Patricia Armocida, Milan Supernatural, Sandra Gering Inc., New York 2013 Todd James, Cooper Cole Gallery, Toronto Business as Usual, Galería Javier López, Madrid World Domination, Lazarides Gallery, London 2012 Free To Be You & Me, V1 Gallery, Copenhagen King of the Wild Frontier, Gering & López Gallery, New York Yield to Temptation, Nanzuka Underground Gallery, Tokyo 2010 Infinity Lessons, Alice Gallery, Brussels Great Adventure, Galería Javier López, Madrid Make My Burden Lighter, Gering & López Gallery, New York 2009 Disaster, Monster Children Gallery, Sydney Double Disaster, Don't Come Gallery, Melbourne Don't Stop Get it Get it, Colette, Paris 2008 Blood & Treasure, Lazarides Gallery, London 2007 Trouble, V1 Gallery, Copenhagen Group exhibitions 2017 Nude, V1 Gallery, Copenhagen 2016 Still Here, A Decade of Lazarides, Lazarides, London 2015 FUD, Barry McGee & Todd James, V1 Gallery, Copenhagen 2014 KNOCK!

Yet «business as usual» — which still approximates fairly well to AR5's RCP 8.5 — is projected to lead to a GMST anomaly in the range of 2.6 to 4.8 C by 2100.

Many seasoned climate scientists and energy experts, some of whom walked the halls here during the meeting like an admonitory Greek chorus, still expressed optimism that nations generating the century - long spike in emissions from burning fuels and forests were poised to divert from paths long labeled on graphs as «business as usual.»

Cap and trade is really still all about «business as usual» - it extends the fantasy that somehow, we'll be able to have all the «clean» energy anybody could ever want, and everybody on the planet will be able to «grow and prosper».

The environmental movement is making bigger waves than ever and although the faces may have changed, the message is still the same: we can not continue with business as usual.

And while recent studies from entities such as the North American Electric Reliability Corporation and the Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration have shown that the Clean Power Plan is still needed to drive the development of additional clean energy and energy efficiency resources in order to achieve significant nationwide CO2 reductions, it appears that the costs of compliance compared to a business - as - usual case will continue to fall — and may even be offset by the significant benefits the Clean Power Plan can offer.

Given that the U.S. car fleet is likely to have grown to over 400 million vehicles by then, we may still end up using more oil in the future than we do today in a business as usual scenario.

Finally, the policy relevance is probably a lot smaller than Dr. Curry makes it out to be, because even if ECS turns out to be as low as she thinks it is (1.64 degrees C per doubling of CO2), if we continue on a business as usual type pathway, we will still commit ourselves to a warming of over 3 degrees.

Five enquiries have circumlocuted what appeared to me to be prima facia evidence of malfeasance over an extended period of time and yet, there they are, still conducting business as usual.

Do you think the following link to a pie chart graphic is still the business as usual, in the wider climate scientific community?

In short, while Hansen was arguably wrong to call Scenario A «business as usual,» Michaels» false assertion that emissions had continued on a business as usual path was (and still is) without basis, and in the process, he grossly misrepresented Hansen's research.

But isn't there somewhere still too big an abyss of uncertainty as definitely for ten years, since 2001, maybe even since 1997 or 1998 the temperatures have not risen (and this year, at least now, is not shaping up as a hot year) while CO2 levels have grown with business as usual.

Even if every environmentalist and climate campaigner agreed with me that we need a radical reappraisal of our present «growth at all costs» orthodoxy (hint: they don't), that still wouldn't mean the only alternative to business - as - usual is some anarcho - primitivist dystopia.

But for them it's still business as usual.

Anyone who still clings to the notion that maintaining the «Business as Usual» automobile centric paradigm in which it is necessary for a single occupant to be esconced in a 3000 lb steel shell to travel from point A to point B doesn't yet understand the full implications of physical limits on a finite planet containing 7 billion plus Homo idioticus.

In case you still think that business - as - usual carbon emissions aren't a big deal: The EIA has released a new forecast of how much emissions will increase by 2030 without strong binding emission reduction targets.

Its rivers and skies are heavily tainted, its environmental laws remain weak, its fixation on economic growth largely dismisses ecology, its emissions are still high, and its new promises are little different from business as usual.

IMO it's misleading, because the US administration is still insisting (a) on only discussing emissions intensity targets (for reducing, not total emissions, but only the rate of growth of US emissions), and US emissions intensity will reduce even under business as usual; and (b) the US administration is still insisting on only considering voluntary targets, despite the fact that even many major US corporations are calling for mandatory caps and despite the fact that there is no evidence that their existing voluntary targets have made any difference.