The case against Diab was
still circumstantial and weak, but French authorities had a new piece of evidence — a positive handwriting comparison analysis between Diab and the bomber.
But, he says, «it's
all still circumstantial — there's no smoking gun.»
Not exact matches
And at Silver's retrial, prosecutors say all the activities that may no longer be official acts — meetings with lobbyists, helping Taub set up a mesothelioma charity race and find jobs for his kids, using official letterhead to oppose a methadone clinic near a Glenwood property — can
still be put before the jury as «
circumstantial evidence.»
Still analyzing the
circumstantial deaths suffered by the youth in the last two years most especially, we need to take closer introspection of the casualties of the major cases of extralegal executions of unarmed protesters in the South East of Nigeria and in Zaria, Kaduna state carried out by armed security forces targeting members of the indigenous people of Biafra (IPOB) and the Shiites Islamic movement.
So far, Larsen
still has only a theory and some
circumstantial evidence.
At this point the evidence remains
circumstantial, and the whole concept is
still a fairly speculative hypothesis.
Remember,
circumstantial evidence is
still evidence.
Concerned with how the liquid morphs despite its consistent chemical makeup,
Still Water is reflective of the apparently paradoxical nature of water to be equally
circumstantial and extensive.
AGW is likely happening but is
still based on «
circumstantial evidence».
If these two lines match as closely as Peterson claims in his presentation, then I will be willing to accept his position (knowing that it
still could be
circumstantial but nevertheless it is what it is).
On your own admittance «anecdotal and
circumstantial material is acceptable if it demonstrates warming yet you
still cant see the double standards you are applying
Yet to support their plans for emissions taxation Western governments, including ours, are
still propagating scientifically juvenile greenhouse propaganda underpinned only by
circumstantial evidence and GCM computer gamesmanship.»
If I were sued for claiming that i «m aware of 5 allegations and provided proof of the 3 that others have heard of, without revealing any information about the two individuals who confided to me personally and who's identity I wouldn't reveal, could I
still be found guilty of slander / libel for making claims I refuse to prove about the two confidential allegations even though
circumstantial evidence (in the form of other rape allegations being made) suggest that it's plausible that someone who is known to be an advocate for women in the community that Joe targets would hear of other allegations?
Moreover, despite the fact that Georgia courts rely on
circumstantial evidence in cases of adultery, it's
still extremely challenging to prove your spouse's infidelity.