Of course, much of this is
still conjecture, and it's still too early to tell exactly what Google might have up its sleeve with Manhattan or Quartz or any other code - named hardware.
Support for this, whilst
still conjecture, is heavy given the constant mention of the eyes, combined with continued use of phrases pointing to being able to «experience something you've never experienced before».
Ok, this is
still all conjecture and rumor, but since they've said they want to have the role cast by March 1st, it's possible one of these guys could get the part.
While essential fats are important for many bodily processes there is
still conjecture on other fats and their role in the body.
Not exact matches
But when it comes to understanding precisely how creativity works in the brain — and whether an innovator's brain is indeed different from yours and mine — the experts
still have to rely more on
conjecture than on fact.
And it would have been risky to entrust policy to what is
still an untested
conjecture.
This
still only means the real number is more likely around 19 - 20 million annual reported abortions worldwide than your number of 46 million which is based on
conjecture about the number of unreported abortions each year.
Even brilliant minds
still find ways to create the supernatural out of nothing but belief,
conjecture and imagination.
In the case of the oldest groups the mechanism of their formation can only be
conjectured; but with more recent groupings the stages of the process may
still be discerned in their present natural state.
Or would you tell them that one has evidence, and one has
conjecture based on a flawed premise, and
STILL let them decide and form their own opinion?
It has been a matter of some
conjecture and speculation among Arsenal fans and the football world in general, a little bit like a Royal birth in a way, because everyone knows what is going to happen but they
still check the news and are surprised when confirmation comes in, what Arsenal Football Club are planning to do on the striker situation.
Second, the asserted reasons why we
still work seem to be
conjectures without much support.
«Even if you took away his most famous result on the Weil
conjectures», says Gowers, «you would
still be left with a great mathematician.»
It is
still in some sense a bit of a
conjecture, and I would say it has not reached the status of established fact, but for Roman and myself at that time, it was fascinating physics.
No one has yet found a rigorous proof, so the idea
still ranks as a
conjecture.
Still, why should that stop him from
conjecturing about what the filmmakers meant?
The dumb joke / terrifying
conjecture being that, with 300
still lingering in the air, you have no idea how far he'll go in «killing everyone.»
And, a snake you encounter in the wild might be local species or, less likely but
still possible at this point in the hobby, an escapee from someone's collection, making its identity open to
conjecture from hundreds of species worldwide.
In a post at his Twitter account today, Vanillaware illustrator Shigatake wrote, «I personally can't say much, but I'll just say, «Regarding Dragons Crown, although there are lots of rumors and
conjecture, it's
still in development.
There is some
conjecture around the controls with many people advising its best to remap the controls in the settings menu especially given its easier to map the shot button to the left or right trigger, that way you can
still keep firing bullets whilst jumping or dashing.
That was a necessary assumption by IPCC, kudos to contributor, computational ocean chemist Prof. David «35 kyrs» Archer, to make anthropogenic emissions bad enough even to begin to make GCMs respond to the debunked AGW
conjecture (it's
still not enough).
And AGW would
still be an evidence - free
conjecture.
If I have correctly concluded that the trust, in general, is
still high for all groups in Gauchat, then I fail to see why Dan's
conjecture is implausible.
This is an incredibly vague statement; but part of the difficulty with this problem, which also exists in one form or another in many other famous problems (e.g. Riemann hypothesis,, P = NP, twin prime and Goldbach
conjectures, normality of digits of Pi, Collatz
conjecture, etc.) is that we expect any sufficiently complex (but deterministic) dynamical system to behave «chaotically» or «pseudorandomly», but we
still have very few tools for actually making this intuition precise, especially if one is considering deterministic initial data rather than generic data.
... Because if there are none, we're
still left with «maybe yes, maybe no», with no one group really able to declare another's conclusions (or
conjecture) as definitely wrong... only their methods.
Propaganda wrapped in scientific working out of
conjecture consequences is
still propaganda.
has been a point of some
conjecture since it came out this summer, I feel that this is an issue that
still needs to be beat, preferably with a large, heavy, object.
And while legal practice is
still driven by precedent, delivery of legal services is propelled by innovation, process, technology, utilization of «the right resource for the task,» a legal supply chain, a growing use of metrics and best practices, data in lieu of
conjecture, and output — results — instead of input — billed hours.
That
conjecture may very well end come Monday, but there is
still a ways to go before the crowd funding kitty totals 75,000,000 XVG target.