Sentences with phrase «still decades of growth»

«The United States is a relatively mature market, so you have to look for immature markets where there is still decades of growth left.»

Not exact matches

If you look at the 550 versus the 160 we have now, you're still looking at a decade of growth.

«If we assume extremely pessimistic nominal earnings growth of 3 % over the coming decade and a compression in the price - earnings ratio to 10, equities would still deliver returns above current bond yields.

The U.K. had been expected to follow close behind the Federal Reserve in raising interest rates for the first time in nearly a decade, but with lower commodity prices and weak wage growth still keeping a lid on inflation, economists now think that the U.K. may not raise rates till 2017 — even though new data out Wednesday showed the employment rate hit a 45 - year high of 74 % in the three months to November.

Sadly, the number of U.S. locations has steadily declined for a decade, but that doesn't mean there isn't still room for growth.

eHarmony is a business that would likely have gone public 5 + years ago under the last decade's «rules,» yet is still privately held in 2010 notwithstanding years of growth, profitability and household name recognition.

While there are some signs of recognition such as the Fed's reduction in its estimated neutral rate from 4.5 percent to 3.0 percent during the last 2 years, the IMF's explicit use of the term secular stagnation in its World Economic Outlook, ECB president Mario Draghi's call for global coordination and greater use of fiscal policy, and Japan's indicated interest in fiscal - monetary cooperation, policymakers still have not made sufficiently radical adjustments in their world view to reflect this new reality of a world where generating adequate nominal GDP growth is likely to be the primary macroeconomic policy challenge for the next decade.

Cele adds that, although China, the largest steel producer and iron - ore consumer, has experienced hiccups, Chinese steel consumption is still expected to grow in the current decade given the rate and levels of urbanisation and GDP per capita growth.

Three decades of dividend growth and a still - reasonable payout ratio leave me confident that HCP will continue to foster safe and reliable dividend growth for decades to come.

While the lagged effects of the increases in interest rates in November and December are yet to flow through, the continuing rapid pace of credit growth is prima facie evidence that financial conditions remain expansionary, especially when viewed in the context of lending rates that are still below the average of the past decade.

This is still higher than the average pace over the past decade, which itself was a period of rapid growth in credit in comparison with nominal GDP.

After more than a decade of growth, renewable energy is still just scratching the surface of its potential to provide energy around the world.

We are still very much breaking down barriers and I don't know how many years or decades it will be before we have the strong network of mentors we need to support funding, growth and exports.»

While some might see all of this as good news — or rather better news than what we have seen for nearly the last decade during which states, state departments of education, and practitioners have been grappling with and trying to make sense of student growth measures and VAMs — others are still (and likely forever will be) holding onto what now seems to be some of the now unclenched promises attached to such stronger accountability measures.

These businesses, regardless of the growth they have delivered over the last few decades, are still nowhere near saturation.

So provided that investors actually expect future economic growth to match historical rates of growth, investors expecting interest rates to remain say, 2 - 3 % below historical norms even another decade would still only be «justified» in bidding stock valuations 20 - 30 % above their historical norms.

For example, if we assume extremely pessimistic nominal earnings growth of 3 % over the coming decade and a compression in the price - earnings ratio to 10, equities would still deliver returns above current bond yields.

I am well aware that the phenomenal earning per share (EPS) and dividend growth of the last decades are not likely to be replicable, but Coca Cola is still a very solid business with attractive prospects.

Even without assuming dividend growth or adding the turbo - charged effect of reinvested dividends, you are still on pace to collect half your initial investment in cash profits from the business alone over the next decade.

Still, if your beneficiaries are smart, they can draw down the account slowly and get the benefit of decades of tax - deferred growth.

Taking a 50 % loss after decades of 10 % annual returns is still better than a 50 % loss after decades of 5 % growth (in fact, after 20 years of growth, it's still 250 % better - and that ratio will only improve the longer you leave it in).

A few minutes hike from the lodge is a beautiful old growth patch of Brazil Nut forest that has been harvested for decades (if not centuries) where the precarious remains of a camp used two months a year by Brazil Nut gatherers can still be experienced.

The moral of the story, in essence, is that «future energy» — at least through the next couple of decades — is largely the same as current energy, with gains in efficiency and growth in adoption of renewable sources and nuclear power still not substantially blunting growth in the combustion of fossil fuels.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

The fact that poor Asian countries with most of the world's population have enjoyed faster economic growth rates than the rich countries over the past 30 years is probably the most important socio - economic fact of our time, but it wasn't foreseen by the modellers and, incredibly, many in the IPCC milieu still deny that it's happened: three IPCC chapters (Chapters 1 and 9 of the WG II report and Chapter 1 of WG III report) go out of their way to assert that global inequality has been increasing in recent decades.

China can make these emissions reductions within the tight constraints of a global 2ºC target while still meeting development and economic growth goals over the next four decades.

Many staff may also have limited training and supervision in working with people with complex needs.8 Over the past 2 decades, there has been a growth of studies investigating the measurement and correlates of EE in staff and patient relationships, although there is still very limited research testing interventions to reduce staff high EE.

We're still a ways off from a growth spurt, but I do believe it'll happen within the next couple of decades.

India and China will be tapering off considerably from their double - digit growth of the last decades to still - solid rates of 6.4 percent and 7.0 percent, respectively.

Despite seven years of construction growth, Herbert says the U.S. has still added less new housing over the last decade than in any other 10 - year period going back to at least the 1970s.