Sentences with phrase «still defend»

They'd send a reservation of rights letter, but might well still defend you.
Even if something seems not right about the claim, the insurance company will still defend you against it.
Of course, your car insurance company will still defend you, but if they are unable to reach a settlement within the scope of your coverage and a judge finds in favor of the other party, you'll be on the hook for the difference.
The Court's opinion in SCA Hygiene did note that an accused infringer can still defend against a claim of infringement based on the defense of equitable estoppel.
To me, the «hidden decline» chapter is almost insignificant, except for the fact that some key players in the climate arena still defend such practices today, just as we've witnessed Gavin doing so, while making ridiculous excuses for it.
Those bright enough to understand the chicanery who still defend it anyway.
Why do most of them still defend the discredited hockey stick, even after the IPCC removed it in 2007?
I find it hard to believe that you guys can still defend Mann / Briffa on their attempt to formulate a hockey stick with the tree ring data.
You still defend Russia at every turn and denounce the US at every turn, and your love for Putin is nothing short of revolting.
Each level has a number of different modes available, with single - player only «classic» (standard tower defense) and «rescue» (sees you protecting a stream of vulnerable units); as well as «skirmish» (where your base pumps out units that head straight for the enemy's base whilst you must still defend your own), «capture the flag» (where you build a special unit to capture a flag) and «territory» (where you try to dominate by «painting» as much of the landscape as possible).
100 % this but for some reason that I'll never understand, people still defend these kind of practices and worst blame them on consumers as if it was their fault that publishers / devs falsely advertised their games.
If that is done, even if publishers give flexibility for the developers to make the game and if they still make the game crap, does that mean you will still defend them?
People who play Gone Home judge those who play GTA, multiplayer games judge singleplayers especially if they don't play multis with them, and speaking from my own perspective I certainly judge those who play FF13, admit to it's flaws, yet still defend it as a «good» game.
Mamacita, Smokey, and Daddy - o all settle down without mating on their minds, but still defend their home against marauders.
If you're the dominant dog, he'll feel secure when you feel secure — and won't defend territory against friendly visitors, meter readers, and letter carriers — but will still defend you and your home when the need arises.
They'd send a reservation of rights letter, but might well still defend you.
I agree with you on this issue but would still defend the right of Catholic adoption agencies to not accept gay couples for adoption.
Even the Cornell paper came out with nearly the same increase bad outcomes as the MANA data, but you people still defend MANA.
Plus we can still defend the Fa Cup trophy which ins» t bad tbh.
the fact anyone can still defend a man with 3 league titles in 2o something odd years for a «big team» like arsenal is truly mind blowing but I guess we are entitled to our own opinions.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
I feel that if he doesn't take nelson at 6 and lets Luck get run over then its just a major oversight and I don't see how you could still defend him.
I am amazed at how people still defend Arsene Wenger when there things stare them in the face.
But sadly there are some who will still defend him.
I mean come on only 1 point out of 12 against teams in the top 10 in the league and people still defend him.
Still, Counsel, PIRES and the rest of their merry band of ambitionless AKBs will still defend him!
Even Van Dijk can not help if Arsenal still defend like that as a team.
Jack Wilshere is over rated like every other English player, I'm not surprised by his shocking performance he's never done anything for Arsenal since that season where he played 50 games but yet some fans on here will still defend him and have you believe he's Iniesta!
All last month i stayed away from this site becouse i know this site is full of akb licker who love more arsen than the club.i new cos we won few pre season micky mouse trophy they will think we will win the world cup.youve been crying out for world class striker n dm midfielder since hendry left.but does he fix the problen no.but them akb lickers will still defend him cos they do nt care about the club they only care abt there loards wenger job.
Honest question...... How can you and others still defend Wenger?
goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?
Despite these difficulties, some competent philosophers still defend dualism (notably Richard Swinburne), and others propose new ways of imagining personal survival of death, Yet every such attempt is followed by a counterattack.
If you still defend Beck's comments you're a complete hypocrite!)
Even you if you don't say anything out loud to your attacker, as it were, you can still defend yourself in your own mind.
Several movements still defend creationism as a dogma.
I no longer agree with all I said in this article, but the point about logic and definition I would still defend.
Even as an atheist I still defend people's right to religious freedom.
To this day, many still defend «enhanced interrogation,» a euphemism if ever there was one, and a direct assault on the dignity of the individual.
(Oh, I still defend Jesus as Truth, but instead of defending Jesus, I just love!)
But they're also the kind of cyberbullying that can wreak havoc on mental health, especially among young Americans — ironic considering that First Lady Melania Trump has expressed a desire to combat cyberbullying while still defending her husband, including the latest Morning Joe tweets.
I believe if Trayvon had been of a different race, Zimmerman would have still defended himself in the same way.
Why on God's green earth are we expending untold energy still defending ourselves when we could just repent of placing trust in man to save & champion us, defend our principles & meanwhile keep us privileged & empowered instead of trusting God to help us?How hard is it to repent?
She encouraged the Church to stop «expending untold energy still defending ourselves.»
Yet he still defends (something like) their concept of subjectivity as a basic requirement for maintaining the personhood of God.
The «grown ups» in here who are still defending creationism sound like morons with no clue about science.
I don't pretend to know all the «why's», but it is obvious if you read Job's defense of himself to his friends, he was at the point of death and still defending his righteousness.
Kuhn qualifies this distinction but still defends it.
Today in the 1980s a potential war in Nicaragua draws widespread opposition, military budgets are closely examined, and social programs are still defended.
Quietly he pulls back from defending its central propositions, using the fog of vacuous platitudes and pseudo-profundity to encourage the perception that he is still defending it.
Anyone who still defends ands makes excuses for Wenger like they do, is mentally ill.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z