Sentences with phrase «still disagree on»

But you can bet your bottom dollar that Protestants and Catholics still disagree on the history of Ireland, the troubles and much that goes on today.

Cassandra Extavour and her colleagues, who study the origins of multicellular organisms and the evolution of cooperation, still disagree on the meaning of key concepts such as cooperation, competition and fitness

Current computer models still disagree on the exact timing of the rain.

In a press release (sent by GOP communications guru Bill O'Reilly, who apparently has signed on to Turner's campaign), the Queens businessman asks: «Do David Weprin and Joe Lieberman still disagree on the World Trade Center mosque?»

I still disagree on the feasibility of home EFM I think it would be a nightmare.

Then how can you say it is acceptable for a large portion of doctrine to be agreed upon by various denominations, but still disagree on others?

I think the article itself points out how we still disagree on the cause of what happened.

The modern Sadducees still disagree on spiritual matters with the Pharisee and Scribe, yet working together Satan uses all three religious mentalities to divide the Body of Christ on earth.

We still disagreed on a lot of theology but we all agreed God wanted to save the world!

Parliament then sat again in August after the riots in major cities for an altogether more collegiate exchange, but the two leaders still disagreed on the appropriate inquiry to hold in the aftermath of the disorder.

During last summer's funding debate, appropriators in turn rejected the breadth of these proposed cuts, though the House and Senate still disagreed on certain areas including climate research.

Not exact matches

The announcer remarks, «Come on guys, we disagree everyday here, but we still put on a show.»

And while there are plenty of direct - marketing customers out there who would disagree with Civale — some of the best - known companies in the world still employ the tactic — it is a risky investment for the newest entrepreneurs on the block.

I think that's still pretty young, although my knees disagree on some days!

Again, if you disagree with this, prove the only thing that makes gravity stick to a 9.8 constant is god keeping his finger on the button and back it up with evidence, or else you're just making baseless claims and still gettting angry at other people for backing up their claims with hard evidence when you can not.

Even if Smith and I end up disagreeing on that point, we could still agree on his anthropology (as I think we do) and on his vision for Christian formation and the university (and I do think we're closer than I let on).

Even though I was clearly conservative, and still am on many issues, I recognized that people of good conscience can and do disagree on many of these issues.

To me I would rather have a friend who I respectfully disagreed with on a view, who I could still find approach and say «we differ on views, but that you are still a cool person but, once you finish you vigil, would you like to come volunteer and paint the school?»

The mature, graceful way is to say «I am fully convinced of how the scriptures speak to me on this and if we can agree on the Major Doctrines of Christianity we can still agree to disagree».

Science is constantly changing but in most religions God is still in charge of the universe and keeps things running smoothly on a macro scale, people may disagree on a micro scale but most agree on a macro scale.

But for instance, I can disagree with a Lutheran on Baptism and we are still brothers in Christ.

You can still dispute and protest things you disagree with, you just can't force your understanding on others.

Since it is the faith that marks us as Christians, the life self - consciously lived in love of God and neighbor according to Jesus» precepts, then we can disagree on doctrines and still share this faith.

A couple can still function if they disagree on this, but there must be some sort of compromise as this will dictate every aspect of your life and your relationship.

But I can still get along and work toward common purposes in a unified way with those who might disagree with me even on some of the essential issues.

When «The Gift of Salvation» speaks of «needlessly divisive disputes» between Roman Catholics and Evangelicals, it does not refer to the many weighty theological matters on which we still conscientiously disagree, such as sacramental theology, Marian devotion, purgatory, etc. «The Gift of Salvation» takes note of these matters, referring to them as «serious and persistent differences» which are «necessarily interrelated» with the affirmations we have made in common, and are thus future agenda items for us.

You have to read it in context... because the extremely educated kermit says so... and the best thing about it... is even though people disagree on the meaning... it's still perfectly clear...

We are still all humans, still all brothers and sisters, even if our views on creation, the universe, human purpose, and life after death disagree.

If this plan was in place earlier those precious lives lost on Friday would still be here with their families, disagree and maybe YOU should be the next victim!!!! I TRULEY hate guns, but if I (grandma) can change with the times so can you!!!

Since you are still reading, can we go back for a second to talking about the theoretical straight common - law couple who, for whatever reason, honestly disagrees with your stance on sex and marriage but still wants to stay in your church?

Can you disagree with the Church's teachings on core doctrines such as justification and still be a Catholic in good standing?

My attitude toward Mohler is the same as my attitude toward Ken Ham: We can disagree on the age of the earth and still have peace with one another, for at the end of the day we can affirm together that Christ has died, Christ has risen, and Christ will come again.

Yah, it's more Spanish than Mexican but I still think it counts and if you were sipping on one of these babies right now, you wouldn't disagree!

However, I have to disagree: «In other news, The Clippers are still clawing for a playoff spot as they host the Indiana Pacers at 2:30, and the Denver Nuggets hope to keep their dream alive against the Milwaukee Bucks at 7:00 p.m. Honestly, these are peanuts compared to the 4 - 8 seeding on this particular day.

I also disagree on the CB part.Even people who aren't Arsenal fans can still look at our options and how we play and know we need a new CB.It's not about the numbers.We need one more reliable CB.Watch people slate Wenger when it becomes a problem but those same people said we are stacked there.We need a reliable CB.One that is very good and very reliable.We lack leaders in our defense.We're always here and there.It wouldn't shock me or even you if we go into the season and we're getting exposed there.It looks likely that it's going to happen.

i can, t believe that this post had been allowed to be posted on this site!anyone connected with arsenal does know that despite his flaws and he has a few WENGER does what he thinks is best for the club, fans and aslo thinks he is still the right man to lead us something im sure many will disagree with but to go as far as calling him an old man, deluded, a sorry excuse of a manager, calling for him to be booted out of the club and not be allowed near it again is out of order, and also shows how clueless & ignorant you are!!

My suggestion is that if Sanchez can learn that, he has the potential to do it much better than giroud does because he is faster off the mark and can dribble.he's too honest in his running so I disagree with those that think it's the set up of the team that failed him.his movement is still a little naive for the premier league Secondly on the left wide argument.Wenger is jamming attacking midfielder out there so as to provide cover for the defensive midfielder using two box to box battlers.it only makes sense because we have lots of them and it can be effective if well mastered.the catch is sacrificing a winger for the the attacking midfielder.if your memory serves you well you'll remember that artetas downward spiral began when teams noticed he was the hub for our possession and started deploying their number 10 to press him.it's been working for ages and can be used on any defensive midfielder regardless of the size so You'll end up with your much cried for cavarlho, kedihra, bender, schneiderline, and every other one passing sideways and backward because of the pressure so I personally appreciate the innovative move but Again appeal to Ramsey and Wilshire to take their job more serious.

I've never once made any sort of statement on MSU fans or the people still supporting the teams or even the people who disagree with me on the actual topic at hand.

i disagree with you on reus... even if we hv ronaldo bale messi neymar i wud still want arsenal to sign him....

I disagree with you on that... Cabaye is better and more experienced than Coq and to some extent Sissoko too let's not be bias, Coq still has some way to go....

but nevertheless I still disagree with your premises on PG and his worth and standing in the game... credit should be given where due, money helps but its not the be all.....

I agree with you on most part, but I still disagree with you.

On the other hand, if your grandchildren are still spanked and you disagree with the practice, you must accept that the parents have the right to discipline as they choose, as long as they are not abusive.

But the short - term and long - term effects of pesticide exposure are still poorly understood, and experts disagree on just how concerned parents should be.

Although you know I disagree with you on some of these issues surrounding the WHO code, I still admire what you are doing here.

Even if they don't like each other, or disagree on many issues, divorced parents still have to work together as a team as far as their children are concerned.

But I disagree with those who think conferences have become a meaningless lobby-fest; they are still a great forum for discussion, debate and decision - making on policy, as packed - out fringes prove.

«We still need something in writing to make sure that what everybody thinks — they are not disagreeing on.

Thus, while my own take on Russia in Ukraine is somewhat more informed by «constructivist realism» and the English School International Society approach, I still believe that International Relations scholars ought to confront the best versions of arguments with which they might disagree, especially on such a pressing matter as the Russian challenge to contemporary World Order.

Perhaps this is because to the extent that there is still an ideological dividing line in UK politics, the Conservatives are one side while Labour and Lib Dems are on the other, however much Darling and Cable agree or disagree on particular points.