Sentences with phrase «still paying a cost»

Bitcoin users can't afford to make mistakes with transactions and still pay the cost of miner fees for orders which don't complete successfully.

So, even though you aren't paying interest on the balance, you are still paying a cost.

So, even though you aren't paying interest on the balance, you are still paying a cost.

Not exact matches

Mulvaney also preemptively addressed questions about the cost of the wall and how many miles could be paid for by the requested sum, pointing to the still - uncertain plans for its construction.

Even with that change, the young and healthy are still paying far more than their cost, and the old and frail are getting a big break.

The MBA team ultimately recommended that Howard get a Square Register, an iPad - based point - of - sale system that will allow his customers to enter their products, calculate the cost and pay by credit or debit card — still checking out without the need for a human cashier.

«If cost - sharing subsidy payments are pulled, insurers would still have to provide lower deductible plans to low - income consumers, but they wouldn't get paid the $ 7 billion a year it costs to do that,» Levitt told Business Insider in an email.

Still, many people factor in an ownership premium — the amount they'd pay over and above the cost of renting for the freedom, stability and simple bragging rights of having their own place.

«Notwithstanding some operational issues in the latter part of the financial year, Karouni still managed to generate a strong cash margin of $ 26 million during its first six months, which assisted with paying down $ 55 million in debt repayments and financing costs.»

Uncle Sam would still have to tap international investors to pay for most of, if not all, the cost of a new war.

The higher your margin the better, because you need to have enough left over to pay your indirect costs or overhead (things like salaries, rent, advertising, telephone, and utilities) and still make money.

Finally, you still have to pay taxes on the annuity income stream on all gains beyond your cost basis.

If a surge ride would normally cost $ 200, with $ 160 going to the driver, Uber should still pay that driver $ 160, but keep the costs for riders contained to, say, $ 80, and eat the other $ 80.

It wouldn't make sense to hoard any nickels, and even still you'd have to find someone who'd want to pay more than 5 cents per nickel if they did cost more material wise, (which they do nt)

Despite the seemingly high cost, the Solar Roof tile system still pays out over the long haul and has a net savings over 30 years.

Because of the cost and difficulty getting banking services, most items bought online are still paid with cash.

Still, nearly three - quarters of take - home pay has to go toward the cost of living in Connecticut.

Still, one of the big remaining questions is how much of the additional cost homebuyers, apartment renters and office tenants will be willing to pay.

Even if we're to look at the costs in other countries and limit it to roughly a 300gb cap, Canadians still pay twice as much.

Even if those costs are rolled into your refinanced mortgage, you still end up paying it.

That means you can get most or all your closing costs paid for, and still have the full - closing - cost loan rate from just two years ago.

Still, the income - tax break on any earnings used to pay legitimate college expenses, coupled with the ability to avoid borrowing costs for tuition later, could make even lower returns in a 529 plan equivalent to higher returns outside of one — and better than not saving at all.

Today's market rates are so low that consumers can have the lender pay their costs, and still receive a very low rate.

@Equateall @Uber Uber is covering the cost of all rides, Uber is still paying drivers higher fares to encourage them to pickup riders.

If you don't want to select individual dividend stocks but still want to try your hand at making money with dividend investing, you might want to consider a low - cost index fund that specializes in dividend paying companies.

For borrowers who are able, one way to avoid excess interest capitalization is to pay down some of the interest costs while still in school.

If you're a repeat homebuyer looking to move within Illinois you may still be able to get a HomeIllinois mortgage, complete with a 30 - year fixed - rate loan, lender - paid mortgage insurance and up to $ 5,000 to use for your down payment or closing costs.

If the compromise shifts the burden to insurance companies to pay the contraceptive costs and the religious - organization exceptions apply, this still leaves a number of self - insuring employers faced with being forced to purchase plans covering contraceptives.

And now the administration was still keeping many protesters locked up — while the few it released were expected to pay their own deportation costs.

Or how about those who still smoke and you are paying for the additional costs in their health care.

And You, my Lord, who know our thwarts and balks, Who met them and Yourself paid out the cost, Still call us with the preacher's talks Toward landfall that outshines his words As tended gardens do the scat of birds.»

The poor often do still get care but their costs are added to paying - costumers bills.

«Treasure Island is still Treasure Island in my view — I can't understand why Australia has to pay more than the rest of the world in terms of cost increases,» Mr Durkan told Fairfax Media.

New buyers were coming in to take over uneconomic vineyards having paid fire - sale prices, so they were working from a much lower cost base yet still producing grapes, he said.

I'm sure if Grzegorz Krychowiak costs 10mil cheap, he still will underbid till some serious club swoop in, pay up and get him.

For context, it is true Spurs have still to pay for their stadium which will cost them loads.

Injuries in pre-season have cost them — Rob Holding is a good prospect but nowhere near ready and Calum Chambers came in as a right - back from Southampton — but it is still a big gamble to pay # 30m for Shkodran Mustafi from Valencia or # 40m for Atletico Madrid's Jose Gimenez.

Levy will not retrieve the # 30million spent on Lamela nor the # 26m it cost to acquire Soldado, but he would still be better off cutting his losses than paying their wages for another 12 months.

By far the best article I have ever read on this site, there was no bias or empty statements, just cold hard facts, the writer even respected wengers budget but still pointed to where he should've improved, there are no excuses, what you read is literrally all u get with arsene, if you gave him a budget of 9m or 1 billion, he will ALWAYS take the risk cause he doesn't give a fk about the consequences as if he was a teenager raging through puberty, his stubborn is absolutely pathetic, can you believe he turned down signing a keeper when almunia was shocking, can you believe he didn't sign a CB when squillaci was awful, can you believe that he REFUSED to sign a CDM for almost 8 years, CAN you believe on one of the most important transfer windows of arsenals history, arsene decided to go host charity matches in rome, that's right instead of trying hard for the fans that have respected him and pay him one of the highest managerial wages in the world, he decided to do what he pleased as usual, cause he doesn't answer to anyone, nor does he giving a flying fk, gazidis a man i thought was also a crook went and did arsene's job for him and at least got us a striker (which cost us the title in january last season) and arsene foolishly proclaims that «if i was here we wouldn't of signed danny» meaning we wouldn't of had ANY recognised cf till giroud recovered, arsene wenger is a joke of the highest order, lack of respect, lack of shame and lack order, i despise him

Factually, AFC ticket costs more than every other club's yet fans still don't mind paying just for the luv of the club.

Craig Gentry and Daniel Nava combine to form an intriguing, low - cost pair, which is apparently what they're comfortable with, considering they're still paying Josh Hamilton scores of millions to play for a division rival.

I'm sure if Grzegorz Krychowiak costs 10mil, he still will underbid till some serious club swoop in, pay up and get him.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

If you're betting $ 50 / game, can you still make money after paying off the subscription cost?

It's added that it will still cost Leicester a decent fee to take him on loan as they would have to pay a loan fee too on top of his # 25,000 - a-week wages, and so perhaps it would make sense for them to go all in and see if they can add him to their squad.

I personally think that the club still has little chance of retaining our 2 world class players despite the rumours but it will obviously come at a cost and be difficult: 1 - Pay them more than anybody else but, and unfortunately they will probably have to insert some type of release clause for next summer if the right club and offer arrives to let them go in case of an ultimate painful underachieving season.

If i recall exactly we had a whole argument over the valuation of Sterling, you refuted on numerous ocassions when i stated that Sterling would cost more than 35 million the point i made over 2 months ago and still make now and im sure most fans would agree is not that gnabry is better its just he is promising talent, and for the value City paid for Raheem (which is almost criminal considering Di Maria, cost PSG less) it would have been better to see Gnabry given a run out or sign someone actually worth 50 million

It still means that revenue generation / cost cutting needs to happen regularly in the future so we can expect high paid players (Terry, Lampard and Cole) to be leaving sooner rather than later.

The first is that we still have 20 years to pay the loan, but as each year passes inflation eats away at its cost.

There are millions of poor kids who only eat because of free and reduced - cost meal programs at public schools, and still tons of kids are running meal account deficits because their parents can't or won't pay their account balances, and it's the kids who suffer in that case.