Sentences with phrase «still speaking to each other»

It's been almost a week since I saw True Grit and my family and I are still speaking to each other in Mattie Ross's deadpan, contraction-less style of dialogue.

I hope we agree on what needs to be tossed and still speaking to each other!

Not exact matches

The reaction to Fowler's blog post showed women that their voices could make a difference, and that speaking up, while still a risk, might mean other woman won't have to experience what they had experienced.

Firstenberg, Graham, and several other Glass owners we spoke to, still believe the headset is unrivaled in its utility for things like hands - free photography or getting directions while driving.

People who have been fighting for this for too long, others who were never comfortable enough to openly talk about their experiences with gun violence, or still others who were never listened to when opening up about their experiences with gun violence or were afraid to speak out — these are the people we are fighting with and for.

And if the idea of international shipping is still a tad overwhelming, try starting out with English - speaking countries such as Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom before moving on to other markets.

He also discusses the potential weaknesses of using the Austrian system, saying that strictly speaking from an Austrian School, you don't get any help regarding the timing of when we would expect to happen, however, you can still use other theories to help with that aspect.

Among other obvious charades... you are still pretending you are not speaking to me... LMAO.

But until we come to the end of ourselves then we are going to do and say what we want, even as it was with me: It's one thing to be a heathen, even as I was, but a whole other ball game to set our hearts on God and His truth; yet, that can only come when we are sick and tired of being sick and tired of our own lives and we just give up, we know then who has given up by the one they advocate for, even has given place to: Paul said; with my heart I want to do what is right, but my flesh does what I hate: This is when God's grace is sufficient, because our hearts are right with God, but our flesh is not: There is a war going on within these temples, therefore; even as our flesh wins out to do what we hate, our hearts are set on God and His ways which has been established in the Word of Truth, which then causes us to stand and speak forth what we believe, even as this causes a rending to happen within us, for Christ to be formed in us this needs to be, as we come up in His glories even for a better resurrection for them who believe: The heart wars against our flesh, even as Christ wars against the man of sin within: For out of the abundance of our hearts our mouth doth speak, therefore; if we speak not the Wholesome Words of our Lord, Then our hearts are still wicked: But to advocate for wickedness instead of Christ, one has become a teacher of lawlessness, he then advocates for the man of sin: Many who have come out of religion has done this, as they went from one mountain top «from the extreme right» of self exaltation (Religion) to the other mountain top «to the extreme left» of the (Heathen) and missed the valley in - between that is takes to humble us: One extreme to the other, and missed Jesus: Jesus is taking ones through the valley's to strip us down of all who we are before exalting us to be just as He, even as the Christ in us overcomes that man of sin (Adam) through theses valleys of contrast that cause a rending to happen within; and when we are rent in two, we stand on His word of truth, so we too can become one with Him, even as Jesus is with our Father: This is how Christ is formed in us: Thank - you Father; in Jesus Name Alexandria

Even if you do nt believe Christianity is true, you still need to understand Christian doctrine to speak intelligently about it (now, that all as.sumes you WANT to be able to speak intelligently, and you have some reason for being here other than just to mock without understanding).

those Jews and Christians who still believe that their respective religious traditions can speak to them and to the world beyond them have an important opportunity to speak to each other in a new way.

Jeremy it just hit me like a bolt of lightning i am so excited about this thought that salvation has nothing to do with eternal life but is speaking of losing the ability to be an overcomer in Christ.Having been there as a carnal christian i always believed in Jesus but i felt i did nt have the power to live a christian life so i felt like a hippocrite i was still subject to sin and sinful desires.So in that sense i had never received salvation because i had never been an overcomer in the first place.So i can see how a christian could lose there salvation having once walked by faith but that does nt effect there eternal life in Christ.Just so others know i am now walking by faith and am an overcomer i know what it is like to experience the power of the holy spirit and to not be overcome by my old nature that is what Jesus wants us all to experience rather than being a victim of the enemy.Whether we are an overcomer or not does nt effect our eternal life.brentnz

Spoke - tell that to the majority of Christians who are quick to hate Muslims and other religions... tell that to the Christians who still falsely believe that America was founded on Christianity — tell that to allthe Christians who are still in denial about Pedophile running around in the Catholic church — Christians are as silly as they come

But, without speaking openly about it — to yourself and others — it is still there.

starman are you referring to the new enlightened world where people are still allowing each other to starve and there are still hundreds of active wars going on as we speak?

Not to mention that as soon as we admit we were wrong, others mo longer put any merit in anything we say, even in the things we still can speak to with some level of confidence.

But here Wieman ignored such praise and spoke with scorn of this concept, arguing that any contribution such atomic events make to other atoms (he still had never used the term «actual entity») comes only after perishing.

There is no other God in the world who died for our sin and raised from the death and he is still living, I know He is living because I have spoke to him even today.

Bultmann's project of demythologizing, he thinks, didn't go far enough, for he still spoke of an «other side» or «other world» to which mythological language, however inadequately, points.

I speak of an «impressionistic account» because I shall be selecting certain features of the still which seem to me of special interest and importance, although I freely admit that there are many other equally interesting and important things which might be said and which on other occasions ought to be said.

All of us are still searchers... Therefore we seek a form of missionary organization in which we may all learn from each other, for in that fellowship we believe that the Holy Spirit speaks to all through each.

(People could well differ on what this would allow us to say about God, with some opting, for example, for Whitehead's primordial nature of God while rejecting the consequent, with others considering even the primordial nature too speculative and speaking only of «creative interchange» or «creative passage,» and with still others considering the consequent nature of God the most empirically grounded feature of Whitehead's doctrine.)

It was therefore natural to speak of the Law and the prophets as comprising the whole body of revealed literature, with the Psalms and other writings still on a somewhat lower plane.

But the other factors to which I have referred are equally operative; and there may be still more about which we have not spoken.

But even if we could, such rudimentary indicators would still not speak to motive (my first point) so wouldn't ultimately be that helpful anyways in any attempt to prove who may be better (or act better) than others.

I knew this was coming because this is something Dr. Radmacher often did when he spoke in churches, but it was still enjoyable to glance around at the people in the church and watch them open their eyes and blink in confusion at each other.

I believe God still rides on the storm... that He speaks these maelstromic whispers to remind us that we live in a fallen world, and sin destroys the perfection He wants for us... that each disaster He does not prevent is an opportunity He provides for us to reflect His deep love and generosity toward each other, to the comfort and recovery of the hurting and surviving.

For still another, it leads the community to look for other contemporary situations to which the text might speak.

If we still continue to speak of a historical revelation we do not mean that it is special in the sense that the people to whom it is communicated are thereby superior to other human beings.

Even when we are tired or we aren't speaking the same language or we are out of step, we still know enough to turn towards each other when the music starts.

If by «the meaning of Christ» we are alluding to what Christ really, that is, concretely, means to us, just as we might speak of the meaning of a friend or the meaning of one's country, then it is, as I have said, the bond which unites us; if, on the other hand, we are thinking of how this concrete, empirical reality ought to be conceptualized and explained, then «the meaning of Christ» has been the most prolific source of our divisions, and still is.

Although it would be a mistake to suppose that Paul speaks at every point for all the early church — that he surely does not do, as he himself lets us know in no uncertain terms — still he represents more clearly than any other early Christian leader the direction which Christian reflection upon Jesus actually took.

He added that although he is used to speaking in front of people, he was still nervous about singing in front of Simon Cowell and the other Britain's Got Talent judges: «I thought about it for a long time before deciding to enter and I kind of thought in the end I'm not going to beat myself up if they criticise me and I don't get any yes's... but I said I'd give it a go»

These and other trends have made me sensible of how different our circumstances are from those in which Neuhaus learned to speak as both a Christian and an intellectual, circumstances that were still to some degree in force when First Things was founded in 1990.

Try as I might, and despite all the people speaking into my life (and even the still small voice of God), I find it extremely difficult to believe something other than what I have believed my entire life.

At other times he invites us to pray with him, and still other times he speaks from the perspective of God consoling or exhorting man in his struggle with sin.

The «need» to be noticed, loved, and treated kindly is a universal need, I think, and even when we do not have the money or the resources to «buy stuff» for people, we can still take notice of others, and speak to them kindly, showing them the dignity and honor they deserve.

(So that when you read a news story, for instance, you might also get a composite assessment value that was assigned directly from other readers without them ever having to express such assessment via speaking, writing, etc. if a group of people are on the scene of some event covered by the news, then obviously there would be great value in knowing some directly transferred assessment values from their brains, rather than what today we get as a summary from a few reporters plus maybe a few witnesses that still have to express what they saw.)

The success of these conceptual explorations seemed to some a «fait accompli» after a time; for areas of agreement were reached by some, others felt that they had explored the ideas of the other professional group and finding them wanting had discarded them, while still others «bought» a psychological line or a spiritual line, so to speak.

While my first negative impression of Schuller was somewhat modified after a week's exposure to his institute and the testimonies of other pastors who spoke in glowing terms of how their own ministries had taken on new life after they followed some of Schuller's principles, I still have some deep theological problems with these principles.

So while it would be admitted that Whitehead has redefined both Bradley's feeling and his immediate experience by (so to speak) peeling them off from each other, nevertheless Whitehead's redefined feeling would still be seen as endowed with the substrative status that in Bradley was accorded to immediacy.

Because he had left himself no room for any kind of language of analogy, which might have allowed him to say how transcendent being shows itself in immanent existence while still preserving its transcendence, and because, moreover, he had decided in advance that one can not speak of being in other than temporal terms, he really could not escape lapsing into a certain fatalism regarding the history he described.

I even thought top clubs were in for him.Some three or 2 seasons back many here were debating why he should be our main striker.As soon as you mention any other strikers name people would come out with stats and many things defending him.Even Wenger has defended him blindly in the past.People say Wenger's stubborn yeah.But don't we know that there's a reason why everything happens?Honestly speaking he's the reason why Arsene Wenger has failed to sign a top notch striker because he still believes in him.The funny thing is we signed Welbeck at that time who to me did nothing before to be the main man here.People keep saying Welbeck is hardworking and that he works his socks off.But the question is was that our reason for signing him.Welbeck being signed to challenge Giroud tells me a lot about Giroud's quality.Even Walcott (no offence to him) who has zero CF qualities was even chosen over him for a string of games and all in all I think he did well but has too many defeciencies for that role.We've compromised as a club and it'll come back to bite us.

Hahahaha now someone is calling Petr Cech a double agent.I thought peeps were like Szczesny is shit he is this and that yes i would admit Szczesny costs us a lot but i was shocked no one felt sorry for a 19 year old keeper being thrown into such a shaky defense even petr cech must be saying in his mind that he is shocked.Let me tell you some go for Buffon or any other legendary keeper and put him in this current arsenal defense and he will still concede mad goals.But Szczesny and Cech both tied at highest clean sheets some seasons ago.Despite Cech having a defense which was light years ahead of this one and to me that speaks volumes about his potential.I love you very much Szczesny i refuse to be ignorant and call you shit what if you were 19 years at Chelsea and started playing i will bet you would have been catching for them.I love you come back stronger for me ok the pitiful thing is that you will meet the same defense again.By the way Cech will come good and stop comparing Ospina to him.

What is confusing is you used word indisputable which is for you and I, Wenger has 1 year left with a dream that he can still make a comeback in spite of all the different negative results staring Arsenal in the face.His game plan is a result of his senior moments and I really would like Wenger not to go away on a low vibe for what he did for club.I do believe he loves ARSENAL and can not cope with the game plan of the other managers to a point where he is putting his faith in the wrong players of which the results speaks for itself.

They still refuse to speak to each other.

The last thing we should be worried about is what other clubs are doing, especially considering the ridiculous amount of issues we have with our own squad... for those still on the fence regarding their feelings towards are current manager please make note of the comments he made following our loss to Stoke... once again he played the referee card, which might have carried a little weight if it wasn't the umpteenth time he has used this excuse and the fact that we were absolutely pathetic in the final third... I could speak at great length about the myriad of problems with this club but I'll focus on just a few of the more pressing concerns:

Speaking of massive performance differentials, whilst FIA simulations put Ferrari, Mercedes and Renault engines within three - tenths of each other, Honda are still way behind - not that you need a simulation to see that, however.

In other words at least pre speech infants are still completing their gestation, so to speak, and so my own preference both as a father and scientist is to encourage parents to let the infant and toddler sleep as close to them as is safe for as long as they can, without specifying an artificial, arbitrary «cut off.»

If you notice that one breast is still producing more milk than the other, this may be something you need to speak to your doctor about.